Friday, October 31, 2025
Politics

How one bad oyster did for the Liberal party | Letter

<strong>Letters: </strong>Responding to a Pass notes article, <strong>Michael Meadowcroft </strong>writes on how a bad bivalve changed political history in the early 20th century

How one bad oyster did for the Liberal party | Letter

The article on oysters (The £1 oyster: cut-price shellfish is all the rage – but is eating it advisable?, 27 October)( brought to mind the significant role that a single oyster played historically in the decline of the Liberal party. In December 1914, Percy Illingworth, the universally respected Liberal chief whip, ate what turned out to be a bad oyster and died soon after from typhoid, aged only 45. Thereafter, Herbert Asquith had immense difficulty in finding an effective and trusted chief whip, finally ending up, in the hung parliament following the 1923 general election, with Vivian Phillipps, whose fatal flaw was that his personal loyalty to Asquith was coupled to a deep dislike of David Lloyd George. As the problematic parliamentary arithmetic of the first Labour govenment played out over the months of 1924, the split between Asquith and Lloyd George deepened, and Phillipps was unable to exercise the crucial unifying chief whip role, with disastrous results for the Liberal party thereafter. Thus a single oyster changed British political history.Michael MeadowcroftFormer Liberal MP and deputy whip • Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Related Articles