Monday, October 27, 2025

Articles by Motley Fool Transcribin,Motley Fool Transcribing

6 articles found

SEI Investments (SEIC) Q3 2025 Earnings Transcript
Technology

SEI Investments (SEIC) Q3 2025 Earnings Transcript

Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2025, at 5 p.m. ET Call participants Chief Executive Officer — Ryan HickeChief Financial Officer — Sean DenhamHead of Investment Managers Services — Phil McCabeHead of Private Banking — Sanjay SharmaHead of Asset Management Distribution — Paul Klauder Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email [email protected] Private Banking Contract Loss — CFO Denham said, "Our strong wins this quarter were offset by a contract loss in private banking, which drove lower net sales for the segment," and noted the fee loss will phase in over several years.Institutional Margins — Denham stated, "Institutional margins declined sequentially mainly due to a handful of choppier items in both the current and prior periods," with none individually material but collectively impactful because of the segment’s lower revenue base. EPS -- $1.30, excluding one-time items, an all-time record for SEI, up 8% sequentially and 17% year over year.Net Sales Events -- $31 million, led by investment managers, with approximately two-thirds driven by client expansion and two-thirds from alternative managers.Investment Managers Segment -- Posted revenue growth exceeding 25% annualized from Q2 to Q3, with double-digit increases in both revenue and operating profit.Private Banking -- Achieved a $13 million client win with a major super-regional U.S. bank, offset by a single contract loss that, if excluded, would have brought net sales close to $47 million for the segment.Advisors Segment -- Delivered the highest year-over-year revenue growth among segments, supported by market appreciation, the integrated cash program, and a $2 million gain from an earn-out true-up.Institutional Segment -- Secured its largest mandate to date with a multibillion-dollar fixed income assignment for a state government client, while revenue and profits were flat for the institutional segment due to less market appreciation benefit than other segments.Year-to-Date Net Sales -- Surpassed $100 million in net sales events year to date, a company record through the third quarter.Margins -- Meaningful year-over-year and sequential improvement at the company level, with investment managers and advisors driving particular strength; private banking margins declined due to prior-year one-time items, and would have risen by 60 basis points otherwise.Assets Under Administration (AUA) -- Achieved broad-based growth across CITs, alternatives, and traditional funds, with alternatives driving the majority of AUA increases.LSV Assets Under Management -- Rose more than 4% from Q2 to Q3, driven by strong market performance and relative outperformance, despite $3 billion of net outflows.Buybacks -- Repurchased $142 million in shares and $775 million over the trailing twelve months, reducing share count by more than 7% in that period.Cash and Debt -- Ended the period with $793 million of cash and no net debt, maintaining liquidity in anticipation of the Stratos acquisition closing.Stratos Partnership -- SEI continues to expect the initial closing by late 2025 or early 2026 and is already seeing increased advisor engagement and incremental business opportunities from the announcement.Capital Deployment -- Made a $50 million anchor investment in LSV’s market neutral hedge fund, contributing $1.5 million in pre-tax income.AI and Tokenization -- CEO Hicke stated, "We're in the early innings of AI and tokenization at SEI," noting encouraging internal adoption and ongoing pilot initiatives with external partners. SEI Investments (SEIC 1.21%) delivered all-time record earnings per share of $1.30, excluding one-time items, fueled by substantial margin expansion and robust revenue gains across core business units. Significant sales momentum was evident, with year-to-date net sales events setting a company record through the third quarter. Business mix diversification was apparent, as approximately two-thirds of IM segment sales related to client expansion and alternatives. Noteworthy strategic wins included the largest-ever institutional fixed income mandate and a $13 million private banking win with a leading U.S. regional bank. Share repurchases continued at an aggressive pace, with $142 million in buybacks and no net debt reported, while capital deployment supported both acquisition and alternative investment initiatives. CFO Denham said, We recognized a benefit of approximately $0.03 from insurance proceeds related to a 2023 claim, and an additional $0.02 from an earn-out true-up in our advisors business. These gains were offset by $0.02 of M&A expense tied to our planned acquisition of Stratos and $0.02 of severance expense related to cost optimization initiatives.CEO Hicke stated, "Our integrated approach is breaking down silos, enabling us to scale across segments, capture wallet share, and deliver consistent, repeatable growth."Management reiterated confidence in pipeline strength and margin discipline, signaling continued investments in technology and talent to support scalable growth.The company emphasized a disciplined approach to buybacks, with a target of returning 90%-100% of free cash flow via dividends or repurchases on a forward-looking twelve-month run rate, and is maintaining excess liquidity for the Stratos transaction.Private credit servicing risk was directly addressed, with McCabe emphasizing SDIC's focus on higher-end clients and low exposure to riskier segments: "we really get paid for the most part with private credit based on invested capital. So we're not subject to mark to market or NAV. So we don't really see any real risk for the business." Industry glossary IMS (Investment Managers Services): SEI's service platform providing investment processing, fund administration, and client expansion solutions—especially to alternative asset managers.OCIO (Outsourced Chief Investment Officer): Investment management model in which institutional clients delegate discretionary asset allocation and portfolio management to a third party.CITs (Collective Investment Trusts): Pooled, tax-exempt investment vehicles used by institutional investors, often within retirement plans.LSV: SEI’s quantitative equity investment affiliate, specializing in value-oriented equity strategies.SMAs (Separately Managed Accounts): Individual investment accounts managed by a professional asset manager, tailored to the investor's objectives. Full Conference Call Transcript Ryan Hicke: Thank you, Brad, and good afternoon, everyone. We appreciate your time today, especially since we recently spent nearly three hours together during our Investor Day just five weeks ago. First, let me express our gratitude for the overwhelmingly positive feedback we've received since Investor Day. Many of you highlighted the energy, enthusiasm, and clarity of our long-term vision as standout themes. That affirmation reinforces our strategic confidence. We are committed to disciplined execution, transparent communication, and creating long-term value for our clients and shareholders. Turning to the quarter's results, we delivered outstanding performance with EPS reaching $1.30. Excluding one-time items, that's an all-time high for SEI. Earnings growth was robust both sequentially and year over year, driven by strong revenue growth and margin expansion. This is the kind of consistent performance we have been messaging over the past few years. Net sales events totaled $31 million with our investment managers business leading the way. IMS posted a record sales quarter reflecting surging demand for outsourcing and client expansions. This is a testament to the strength of our sector, our competitive position in that sector, and our continued investment in future capabilities. As we said at Investor Day, we believe the growth runway here is exceptional. Congratulations to Phil and his team. IMS sales activity was notable for its broad-based nature, with no single client driving the performance. Approximately two-thirds of our sales events were tied to client expansion, increasing our wallet share. Additionally, two-thirds of the events came from alternative managers. This level of diversification and momentum across client types, both new and existing, reinforces our conviction in the durability of our growth strategy. We also continue to engage with large well-known alternative asset managers who are new to exploring outsourcing fund administration. We believe we are well-positioned in these processes given our best-in-class capabilities, track record of execution, and client reference ability. Due to the size and complexity of these opportunities, the contracting process tends to be longer. And we expect to be able to provide more clarity on the nature of these opportunities in our pipeline in early 2026. Switching units, sales activity in our asset management business was highlighted by the single largest mandate win in our institutional segment to date. A multibillion-dollar fixed income assignment for a state government client. We believe this win reflects the early impact of Michael Lane and the entire team's evolved approach, introduced to this audience last month. We are delivering targeted solutions in areas where SEI has deep expertise while complementing our established OCIO offering. The win also reinforces our ability to compete successfully for specialized mandates and demonstrates our capacity to meet the growing demand for tailored investment strategies from large clients. Private banking secured a $13 million win this quarter, partnering with a leading super-regional U.S. bank on a comprehensive transformation initiative across all business lines. This engagement is strategically significant, encompassing technology, outsourced operations, and a substantial professional services component. Our multiyear engagement with this firm to help them define their targeted operating model and build a business case was instrumental in winning the business. This win is an enormous affirmation of the pivot we made a few years ago to be the market leader in the regional bank segment. We anticipate the project will involve extensive work to retire the client's legacy systems, execute complex data conversions, and integrate new platforms. Importantly, SEI is uniquely positioned to support our clients throughout this transition with our professional services offering, representing an incremental opportunity that is not reflected in Q3 sales results. Our strong wins this quarter were offset by a contract loss in private banking, which drove lower net sales for the segment. We've noticed since 2022 that this client was at risk due to a strategic shift away from their bank trust model, and we received formal notice at the very end of September. This is our only notable loss year to date in private banking. The financial impact should be modest as fee conversions typically occur over multiple years. Importantly, we're confident that recent and future wins will more than offset this loss, supported by a healthy diversified pipeline of opportunities nearing the finish line. Net sales would have approached $47 million for the quarter excluding this single client loss. Even with the loss, posting $31 million in net sales events is a strong result, especially as our new wins are well aligned with SEI's long-term strategic direction. Stepping back, SEI's net sales events have surpassed $100 million year to date, a record for SEI through the third quarter. And as we sit here today, we have more confidence in our sales pipelines when compared to Q3 last year. Building on this momentum, our confidence in the Stratos partnership has only grown since the July announcement. Although we have not yet closed, we are already seeing tangible benefits. Awareness of SEI is increasing across both broker-dealer and RIA channels, and we are receiving renewed inbound interest in our capabilities as a result of the announcement. That enthusiasm was on display at the Stratos National Meeting in mid-September, where advisers consistently asked how they could do more with SEI. And earlier this month, Stratos' leadership, including CEO Jeff Concepcion, joined us at our annual SEI Advisor Summit on Marco Island, which saw record client attendance. Our SEI advisers responded very positively to the partnership and the expanded opportunities it creates. We are on track towards the initial closing, which is expected in late 2025 or early 2026. As we said in New York, we are allocating capital to the highest return opportunities and driving margin expansion through cost optimization and targeted investments in technology, automation, and talent. We're in the early innings of AI and tokenization at SEI. Internally, adoption is encouraging, and we're applying AI to real workflows. Externally, we're advancing tokenization pilots with partners. We expect these initiatives to support efficiency and scalability over time. But near term, our focus is on use case validation and a disciplined rollout. In summary, our year-to-date sales events, record EPS, and expanding pipeline reflect SEI's continued momentum, underpinned by disciplined execution and a clear enterprise strategy. Our integrated approach is breaking down silos, enabling us to scale across segments, capture wallet share, and deliver consistent, repeatable growth. We are laser-focused on value creation, measured by operating margin, EPS growth, and total shareholder return. Significant opportunity is ahead, and our confidence in SEI's ability to execute and outperform is stronger than ever. And with that, I'll turn it over to Sean. Sean Denham: Thank you, Ryan. Turning to slide four, SEI delivered an excellent quarter. Let me start by calling out the unusual items that impacted our Q3 earnings. We recognize the benefit of approximately $0.03 from insurance proceeds related to a 2023 claim into other income. An additional $0.02 from an earn-out true-up in our advisors business. These gains were offset by $0.02 of M&A expense tied to our planned acquisition of Stratos and $0.02 of severance expense related to cost optimization initiatives. For context, unusual items benefited EPS by $0.58 last quarter and $0.08 in Q3 of last year. Excluding these items, EPS grew meaningfully, up 8% sequentially and 17% year over year. It's worth repeating, Q3 represents an all-time record level of EPS for a quarter excluding unusual items like the significant gain on sale realized last quarter. Let's take a closer look at how each of the business units performed on Slide five. Private banking saw a 4% increase in revenue year over year, thanks in large part to healthy growth on our SWP platform. Our investment manager segment delivered another standout performance, posting double-digit revenue and operating profit growth. We continue to see robust growth in alternatives across both the U.S. and EMEA. Traditional revenue in IMS also grew at a healthy pace, benefiting in part from favorable market appreciation. Turning to advisers, this business posted the highest year-over-year revenue growth among all of our segments. We're seeing growth driven by market appreciation, contribution from our integrated cash program, and improving momentum in the underlying business. Institutional revenue and operating profit were essentially flat for the quarter, reflecting lower equity exposure and less benefit from market appreciation compared to our advisors business. On a sequential basis, both revenue and operating profit increased across all business units, with especially strong margin expansion in investment managers and advisers. As you'll see on Slide six, margins were solid in Q3 with meaningful improvement both year over year and sequentially. The year-over-year decline in private banking margin was due to one-time items that benefited last year's results. If we exclude those, private banking margins would have increased by approximately 60 basis points. Institutional margins declined sequentially mainly due to a handful of choppier items in both the current and prior periods. None of these were individually material, but the impact is more pronounced given the lower revenue base in this segment. For investment managers, margins came in ahead of what we communicated last quarter, supported by revenue growth that exceeded 25% annualized from Q2 to Q3. This growth was fueled by factors that are inherently difficult to forecast, such as market appreciation in the traditional business and the timing of capital deployment in the alternatives business. Advisors margin growth reflected strong revenue growth in a $2 million earn-out true-up contributing about 120 basis points to Q3 margin. Margin improvement also benefited from our integrated cash program, which added $10 million to operating profit versus the prior year. Finally, we incurred severance costs of nearly $4 million this quarter, reflecting our commitment to supporting employees through transitions as we continue to evolve our business. The impact was spread across all business units, and most notably corporate overhead. Excluding severance and approximately $3 million of M&A costs related to Stratos, corporate overhead came in at $38.5 million for the quarter. Turning to sales events on Slide seven, Ryan discussed the most notable items in the quarter, including strong wins in investment managers, our large regional bank win in private banking, and a significant institutional win with a new government client. In Asset Management, this quarter's wins offset client departures, most notably in our institutional segment. While losses were previously the only story in this segment, we are now seeing growth elsewhere that offsets these headwinds. A promising sign for the trajectory of our asset management business. Turning to Slide eight, SEI delivered strong asset growth both sequentially and year over year. Growth in assets under administration was broad-based across CITs, alternatives, and traditional funds. While CITs and traditional funds receive some benefit from market appreciation, the majority of the AUA growth was driven by alternatives. Assets under management also increased, with modestly positive net flows in advisers driven by accelerating growth in ETFs and SMAs, which offset continued pressure on traditional mutual funds. Institutional flows were essentially flat, reflecting offsetting sales events. While overall net flows were modest, this trend marks a clear improvement over prior years and supports our evolving asset management strategy. LSV assets under management each increased over 4% from Q2 driven by strong market performance and outstanding performance relative to benchmarks. Market appreciation was only partially offset by nearly $3 billion of net outflows, similar to the pace realized in the first half of this year. LSV performance against relative benchmarks is supporting continued strength in performance fees, which totaled $8 million or $3 million at SEI's share in Q3. Turning to capital allocation on Slide nine, we ended the quarter with $793 million of cash and no net debt. We are maintaining an excess cash balance in anticipation of funding the first Stratos close with the balance sheet cash. Share repurchases represented a primary use of capital, totaling $142 million in Q3 and $775 million for the trailing twelve months. That represents SEI repurchasing more than 7% of shares outstanding just over the last year. At the same time, we're deploying incremental capital to strategic investments that support long-term growth. This quarter, we made a $50 million anchor investment in LSV's market neutral hedge fund. Our early commitment adds credibility to the new strategy and is expected to support future fundraising from institutional investors. Our investment had a strong start, contributing $1.5 million to Q3 results before tax, which has captured a net gain on variable interest income. In summary, SEI's third quarter results reflect continued progress across our core businesses. We are focused on driving growth, optimizing margins, and deploying capital to maximize shareholder value. With that, operator, please open the call for questions. Operator: Thank you. Please press 11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, press 11 again. And our first question will come from the line of Crispin Love with Piper Sandler. Your line is open. Crispin Love: Thank you. Good afternoon. Hope you're all well. Ryan, you mentioned that two-thirds of your sales events were from alternatives. I don't recall you ever making a comment quite like that as it pertains to sales events. First, are those two-thirds similar to recent quarters, give or take? And then second, when you look at those sales events, the recent ones, are the vast majority from the largest alternative players out there, such as the ones that you called out on a slide at Investor Day being clients, or are there smaller nonpublic alts as well that make up a good portion of those wins? Ryan Hicke: Hey, Crispin. Great to hear from you. It's a great question. I'll go kinda high level and then kick to Phil. So, again, I think it's just an opportunity for us to offer continued transparency into sort of where we're seeing growth. And as we touched on in the investor day, when you look at alternatives in that overall space and the surging demand for outsourcing that I mentioned, we're just kinda calling that out and trying to give a little bit more transparency and granularity. But when you go to Phil, if you wanna chime in here, I think the Crispin's question is, is it a lot of the same names that we highlighted that day or new names or a little bit of both? Phil McCabe: Thanks, Crispin. And this is Phil. Actually, it's a mixture of everything, large clients, small clients, but no single event was greater than 10% of the overall number. So it really is a mixture of things anywhere from private credit to insourcers moving to outsourcing, retail, all to, you know, pretty much across the board. We're seeing a lot of alternatives in CITs. It really was a mix. We expect some other announcements, probably early next year to talk a little bit more about some of the larger managers that are moving from insourcing to outsourcing. Crispin Love: Great. Thank you. Appreciate that and definitely good news there. Second question, can you just give any color on the known contract loss in private banking with a long-time client? Any details on the losses of merger, competitive takeaways? Just any color would be great. Sanjay Sharma: Yep. I can answer that question. First of all, this is I to highlight this is one of loss in last three plus years since I took over the responsibility. And this is something, as Ryan mentioned, we knew about it since 2022. This was a major operating model change for this client. And so we should not read this like a trend. This is a one-off scenario. We have worked with the client. And as you could see, these kinds of deconversions, they take a long time. The onboarding takes time. The deconversion also takes longer time. But as Ryan has mentioned and Sean has called out that to be on the safer side, we took the hit and announced it in one go. Ryan Hicke: I do. And I think, Crispin, it's really important to note, and we try to call this out specifically in the script. We got the notice literally at the very end of September. And it's a firm that we have known a long time. We have been actively engaged in trying to help them think through their future operating model. But as Sanjay just highlighted there, we got the notice. We took the entire loss. I don't think we have full insight into the entire deconversion schedule and exactly what will go when. So we're definitely erring on the side of conservative here. And I think it's really important to emphasize Sanjay's point that this is a one-off event. This is absolutely not a trend. And it can't be ignored, the win that we also have in this quarter as well. But you know, certainly not one. We don't like losses. We worked really hard with this firm. We will support the firm actively as a great partner through their transition to a new operating model. As you know, I always live in a world of optimism. I think there's always gonna be more opportunity for us when we treat the client right on the way out. They will probably find a way back to SEI in other ways. Crispin Love: Perfect. Thank you. I appreciate taking my questions. Operator: Thank you. One moment for our next question. And that will come from the line of Jeff Schmidt with William Blair. Your line is open. Jeff Schmidt: Hi, thank you. For the integrated cash program, you're earning close to the Fed funds rate on that cash with a little spread. Is Internet getting a fixed rate? Or are you considering allocating some of that to fixed rates now that the Fed is easing again? Or how should we think about that? Paul Klauder: This is Paul, Jeff. So on that, we're earning about 370 basis points presently and we're giving the investor about 55 basis points yield, which is pretty attractive versus our competitors. So we'll continue to look at that investor yield as rates come down. Typically, when a rate comes down 25 basis points, we usually impact the investor by 15 and then we would impact ourselves at 10. At some point, we'll get to a floor, but that's kind of the current program and the current state of affairs on the integrated cash. I think one thing to note when it comes to the integrated cash is to also note that we have 20 times the amount integrated cash and fixed income portfolios. And so when you see a decline in rates, you typically are going to see over time an increase in price. And so some of that you look at it in isolation, it'll have an impact. But overall, it'll be muted by the amount of fixed income we have in our portfolio. Jeff Schmidt: Okay. And then in private banks, just looking at the expense growth there, it's running a little bit higher over last quarter '2 than we had seen in the previous really a year or two. Is that mainly investments in talent that you've been calling out recently? Or what's driving that? And then how should we think about the offshoring with the new service center? Would that bring growth down over time? Ryan Hicke: Jeff, I don't think there's anything unusual to call out here with banking if Sanjay wants to provide color. Some of it's just, as Sean mentioned, investments we make to kind of onboard the backlog. Make sure that we're kind of set up to, you know, really successfully create the experience that we want with these clients. But I don't think there's anything you should read into that, Sanjay. Sanjay Sharma: No. And I would act with the same. I think for us, the number one most important thing is backlog delivery. Signing a new client is a great thing. Yes. We all celebrate. Successfully delivering and onboarding those clients is equally important. And that's why we would see sometimes that, yes, and that could be for professional services delivery, or it could be converting new clients. Jeff Schmidt: Great. Thank you. Operator: Thank you. One moment for our next question. And that will come from the line of Alex Bond with KBW. Your line is open. Alex Bond: Just wanted to start with the IMS business. Obviously, a strong quarter there. And I know you mentioned the growth there was in part driven by market appreciation and the deployment timing. But just trying to size up the 3Q margin level is the right way to think about, the margin for this business on a forward basis considering, the Alt's deployment. And then also, just how the margin here might be impacted sequentially by the ongoing investments you're making and, you know, just trying to see if there will be any impact there you know, from a timing perspective just in terms of a higher expected investment level, in one quarter or the other? Sean Denham: Sure. So, so this is Sean. So as I indicated last quarter, we were actually kinda given some light guidance to the street that the margin improvement we were we're anticipating good margins going forward, but we do know we need to make certain whether it's anticipation of new clients coming on board and us hiring ahead of those clients, Again, as I mentioned in my remarks, the Q3 improvement in margins did take us a little bit by surprise. Some of that, as Phil mentioned, was due to market appreciation. I mentioned that in my comments. That margin or market appreciation obviously is not tied to cost. So when with the market appreciation, you're going to have higher margins than expected. On your the second part of your question on what we expect in the future, we're still expecting strong margins. When I give guide or light guidance, I would I would call it, light guidance on what we may expect or what you can expect from margins going forward, I'm really giving more guidance over a period of time as opposed to quarter over quarter. So we do have, you know, for Q4 going to Q1 into next year, we will continue to be making investments into platform. There's certain things that in Phil's business we need to invest in front of. Whether that's hiring talent in order to support future growth, whether that is certain parts of our technology base, So in a broad brush, we would expect margins you know, to be relatively flat, if not a downtick especially as we move into 2026. Ryan Hicke: Got it. Understood. That's thing I think it's important to add I think it's important to add to that, though, that I think we try to continue to emphasize this message. When we think about how we run the company, we're not trying to run the company on a unit by unit basis. And get too focused on the individual margins in the unit. So if we saw and I'm not forecasting or foreshadowing anything. I'm just saying, what we see as Phil talked about in New York, what we see with that pipeline and what we see with that client base right now we are going to maximize that opportunity. And if that required us to take the margins down a little bit in IMS, we would be more focused on SEI's margins and what we would do in other units to make sure SEI's margins continue to grow and expand, as Sean talked about, in New York. But, I mean, Phil, I think, is really consistent as he was in New York and here. We are really, really enthusiastic about what we see right now with our existing client base and pipeline in IMS. And where we're positioned competitively, we will not let that window pass us by. Alex Bond: Got it. Understood. No. That's helpful. And then maybe just one more. Just wondering if you could speak to the sales mix between, US and international this quarter and also maybe how that's tracking year to date relative to last year. I know it's still early days on the on the revamp for that area of the business, but maybe additionally, if you could just walk us through maybe what we should be looking for over the coming months and quarters as it relates to just tracking the progress you're making on the on the international front. Thank you. Sanjay Sharma: Yeah. This is Sanjay here. So on the international front, as I said on the Investor Day, we are in the early phases. Defining our go to market strategy. And as I as I said at that time, we're going to focus on maximizing our presence in the jurisdictions we already have presence. So, for example, UK or Dublin or Luxembourg, those jurisdictions have been we continue to expand our presence there. And we are in the process of defining our strategy. And the other part, we're looking at, okay, how we maximize our opportunities to existing clients. The clients, they we already had the assistance in US market. And they have presence in those jurisdictions. So that's what our focus would be. Ryan, Sean, you want to add anything? Sean Denham: Yeah. I will just this is Sean. I'll just echo what Sanji said. Coming off the heels of Investor Day just a few weeks ago, kind of letting everyone there know that, you know, we are looking at the difference between domestic and international. Would echo what Sanjay said. Little bit early days. So I don't think as we sit here today, we're ready to start giving color around revenue mix between international That'll come more as we realign our segments, as we start disclosing our segments and with anticipation that at that time we'll give more breakdown between international growth versus domestic growth. Alex Bond: Got it. Thank you. Operator: Thank you. One moment for our next question. And that will come from the line of Ryan Kenny with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Ryan Kenny: Can you unpack a little bit more how you're thinking about the pace of buybacks you did 1.6 million shares in the quarter. Is that the right pace going forward? Or should we expect to slow down as the Stratos acquisition moves forward? Sean Denham: Yeah. So you know, the way I would answer that is, very similar to the way I answered at investor day. So we are expecting that free cash flow on a you know, forward looking twelve month run rate would be we would be returning that 90 to 100% through dividends or buyback. So that's the way I'm looking at it. So the cash build, as I is anticipation of drawing that cash down through the Stratos consummation of the Stratos deal And then going forward, I think you can expect whatever our free cash flow that we generate, we're gonna be returning that 90 to 100% back to the shareholders either through dividends but primarily through buybacks. Ryan Kenny: Thanks. That's helpful. And then separately, we've seen some modest credit fears in the market with a few bankruptcies, and you're a big private credit servicer. So are you seeing any impact at all in your private credit servicing pipeline? It sounds like no, all good, but be helpful to clarify. Phil McCabe: Sure, Ryan. This is Phil McCabe. I would start by saying that IMS has been IMS has business is really, really diversified by product, by jurisdiction, by type of client. So, but we have spoken to a lot of our private credit managers. They literally are the best of the best in the industry. And they really know how to manage credit risk. They tell us that they're not concerned at all. They're still launching products aggressively. And, you know, collectively, they do, say that there could be a new manager that entered the space on the smaller side. And there could be some struggles in the future. But that's in a part of the market that we really don't play in. We're on the higher end of the market. They're doing really well. The one inch fact on top of all that, is that we really get paid for the most part with private credit based on invested capital. So we're not subject to mark to market or NAV. So we don't really you know, as of right now, we see any real risk for the business. Ryan Kenny: Thank you. Operator: Thank you. And our next question will come from the line of Patrick O'Shaughnessy with Raymond James. Your line is open. Patrick O'Shaughnessy: Hey. Good afternoon. So I understand I heard you when you said that we should not read today's chunky client loss that you spoke about in private banks. As a trend going forward, but to what extent are there other high-risk relationships in your existing private bank's client portfolio that you're keeping an eye on at this point? Sanjay Sharma: Patrick, that's a great question. As of today, we are not aware of any such large client or any such large risk. I also want to share one example. Early this month, we hosted all of our clients here in Oaks Campus. The engagement was the best engagement over the last three years. So I don't see that as a trend or a big risk. Ryan, Sean? Ryan Hicke: No. I completely agree with you. I mean, if there's you know, we are always gotta be you know, vigilant in front of our clients, engaged with our clients. But relative to where we were a few years ago, we feel extremely confident that we are in the right place with our clients in the banking business. Patrick O'Shaughnessy: Got it. Appreciate that. Same time. I will say that was that answer. Sanjay Sharma: I think I was I appreciate that answer. Sorry. He said he appreciates the answer. Oh, okay. Patrick O'Shaughnessy: Sorry to interrupt. So and then for my follow-up question, with the divestiture of the Archway family offices business from the investment in new businesses segment, can you just remind us what's left in that investment in new businesses segment and the strategic importance of that for SEI? Sean Denham: So included in ventures, there's really two main revenue streams, although albeit they're not large. One is our Sphere business, and the other piece is our private wealth management business. And those, as I mentioned on Investor Day, if and when we resegment the organization, that segment from a revenue standpoint or even from a segment standpoint will cease to exist. That revenue will then follow the client and the related other segment that it pertains to. Patrick O'Shaughnessy: Got it. Thank you. Operator: Thank you. And we do have a follow-up question. I believe that will come from the line of Ryan Kenny with Morgan Stanley. Ryan Kenny: Hi. Thanks for taking my follow-up. Can you quantify how much margin suppression there's been from accelerated investment? Any numbers or quantification we can think about? Sean Denham: Yeah. Ryan, this is Sean. I don't think I could quantify that. That's actually not really the way we think about the business. It's a great question, but I could not sit here and quantify that for you. Ryan Kenny: Alright. Thanks. Operator: Thank you. I'm showing no further questions in the queue at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to Mr. Ryan Hicke for any closing remarks. Ryan Hicke: Thank you all for your questions and for joining us today. As we close the quarter, I want to emphasize that SEI is on a strategy that positions us for long-term success. But I think it's important as we close the call, we reflect a little bit on the results this quarter. We delivered record earnings per share. The IMS unit had a record sales quarter. We had an important strategic win in the banking business and I know we didn't touch on this so much in the Q&A, but there are some really good leading indicators and lagging indicators when we start to unpack what's going on in the asset management businesses at SEI. And for those reasons, we're confident in our ability to capitalize on opportunities ahead, deliver for our clients, and create value for our shareholders. But thanks again everybody for your time and interest in SEI, and we look forward to updating you next quarter. Operator: This concludes today's program. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect.

NBH Bank (NBHC) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Technology

NBH Bank (NBHC) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2025, at 11 a.m. ET Call participants Chairman and Chief Executive Officer — G. Timothy LaneyPresident — Aldis BirkansChief Financial Officer — Nicole Van DenabeeleDirector of Investor Relations — Emily Gooden Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email [email protected] Adjusted net income -- $36.6 million adjusted net income, up 30% annualized from the prior quarter, excluding $1.7 million in Vista Bank merger expenses for the third quarter of 2025.Adjusted EPS -- $0.96 per diluted share, excluding non-recurring transaction costs for the third quarter of 2025.Net interest margin (tax-equivalent) -- Expanded three basis points sequentially to 3.98%.Pre-provision net revenue (tax-equivalent, adjusted) -- Fully taxable equivalent adjusted pre-provision net revenue grew 17.5% annualized over the prior quarter.Loan funding -- $421 million funded. The commercial and industrial (C&I) portfolio annualized growth was 8.7%.Deposit trends -- Core deposits grew by approximately $200 million on a linked-quarter spot basis. Total deposits increased $22 million sequentially, with average deposits at $8.2 billion.Allowance for loan losses -- Maintained at 1.2% of total loans, with $18 million in additional credit marks on acquired portfolios, representing 24 basis points of supplemental loan loss coverage.Noninterest income -- Increased 21% sequentially to $20.7 million, 13% higher year-over-year, aided by $3.5 million in partnership investment gains.Noninterest expense -- Totaled $67.2 million in the third quarter. Adjusted projected core noninterest expense is $64 million to $66 million for the fourth quarter of 2025, excluding acquisition costs, with $7 million to $9 million expected for 2Unify in the fourth quarter of 2025.Tangible book value per share -- Increased at a 12% annualized rate to $27.45 sequentially.Capital position -- Tangible common equity ratio was 10.6%, Tier 1 leverage ratio was 11.5%, and common equity Tier 1 ratio stood at 14.7%.Share repurchases -- 240,000 shares repurchased for $8.9 million. 359,000 shares repurchased year to date.Vista Bank merger -- On track to close in the first quarter; $1.7 million in related expenses incurred.2Unify platform launch -- Launched during the quarter, with expense step-up to $6.2 million. Expected ongoing quarterly 2Unify expenses of $7 million to $9 million for the fourth quarter of 2025; revenue guidance deferred until the next earnings call. National Bank Holdings (NBHC +2.30%) management confirmed that the Vista Bank acquisition remains on schedule and noted specific integration synergies, particularly across treasury management and wealth business lines. Stable credit quality trends included further reductions in nonperforming loans and assets. The company indicated flexibility for further capital deployment through mergers and acquisitions, enhanced by significant year-to-date share repurchases totaling 359,000 shares. Guidance for the next quarter implies continued focus on controlling core noninterest expenses and supporting growth in new business lines such as 2Unify. The chief financial officer stated that the fully taxable equivalent net interest margin is expected to remain in the mid-three nines for the remainder of 2025, barring further Federal Reserve action.Leadership described recent loan balance declines as driven by a heavy volume of payoffs in commercial real estate, not by credit concerns or internal risk actions.The bank expects deposit costs to decrease in the fourth quarter as a result of actions aligned with the latest Federal Reserve rate cut.Pro forma with Vista Bank, management expects to remain comfortably below the 200% non-owner occupied commercial real estate/risk-based capital threshold.Management cited a very important partnership discussion that could have a powerful impact on the trajectory of the 2Unify platform.The company maintains that classified and criticized assets declined sequentially, suggesting credit resilience in the commercial portfolio.Commenting on the competitive loan environment, the chief executive officer noted that private credit continues to step into the market, lending money on credit terms and at pricing that is highly competitive. Industry glossary 2Unify: NBHC’s proprietary digital banking platform, referenced as a business line and cost center in the call.C&I (Commercial & Industrial): Loans made to business borrowers for equipment, working capital, and other business purposes, distinct from commercial real estate lending.Core deposits: Stable, low-cost deposits from customers, excluding brokered and high-balance, rate-sensitive accounts.Non-owner occupied CRE: Commercial real estate loans for properties not occupied by the borrower, typically presenting higher regulatory scrutiny and risk.Camber deposits: Specialized deposit product used by NBHC to manage regulatory asset thresholds. Full Conference Call Transcript Emily Gooden: Thank you, Shelly, and good morning. We will begin today's call with prepared remarks followed by a question and answer session. I would like to remind you that this conference call will contain forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, statements regarding the company's strategy, loans, deposits, capital, net interest income, noninterest income, margins, allowance, taxes, and noninterest expense. Actual results could differ materially from those discussed today. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, which are disclosed in more detail in the company's most recent filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These statements speak only as of the date of this call and National Bank Holdings Corporation undertakes no obligation to update or revise these statements. In addition, the call today will reference certain non-GAAP measures, which National Bank Holdings Corporation believes provides useful information for investors. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the GAAP measures are provided in the news release posted on the Investor Relations section of www.nationalbankholdings.com. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over and introduce National Bank Holdings Corporation's Chairman and CEO, Mr. Tim Laney. G. Timothy Laney: Thank you, Emily. That's one of the more enthusiastic readouts of disclaimer I've heard in a while. That was great. So thank you. Good morning all and thanks for joining us as we discuss National Bank Holdings third quarter earnings results. I'm joined by our President, Aldis Birkans, as well as our Chief Financial Officer, Nicole Van Denabeele. We're pleased to have delivered $0.96 of earnings per diluted share and a return on tangible common equity of 14.72%, and it should be noted that this return was achieved while maintaining a high level of capital. We were able to deliver these results despite continued headwinds related to heavy volume of payoffs coming primarily out of our CRE portfolio. Now having said this, I'm proud of our team's new loan production during the quarter and the quality of the new relationships is very strong. We're pleased to announce our merger with Vista Bank shares or to have announced our merger with Vista Bank shares during the quarter. I'll have to say the more we learn about the quality of our new teammates, the more excited we become about future possibilities. And we believe we're set up for a nice fourth quarter. New relationship activity is strong, credit quality trends continue to be positive, we have additional productivity initiatives in the work and we believe we have some very positive possibilities for 2Unify. So on that note, I'll turn the call over to Nicole to cover the quarter in greater detail. Nicole Van Denabeele: Thank you, Tim, and good morning. During today's call, I will cover the financial results for the third quarter, as well as touch on our guidance for the remainder of the year, which does not include any future interest rate policy changes by the Fed. For the third quarter, we reported net income of $35.3 million or $0.92 of earnings per diluted share. We recently announced our planned merger with Vista Bank and we remain on track to close in the first quarter. In conjunction with the acquisition work, we incurred approximately $1.7 million in deal-related expenses during the quarter. Excluding the acquisition expenses, adjusted net income increased 30% annualized over the prior quarter to $36.6 million or $0.96 of earnings per diluted share. This resulted in a strong adjusted return on average tangible assets of 1.6% and an adjusted return on average tangible common equity of 14.7% on an elevated equity base. During the third quarter, we grew our fully taxable equivalent adjusted pre-provision net revenue by 17.5% annualized over the prior quarter, maintained a top quartile net interest margin, and built additional excess capital. Also during the quarter, our teams generated $421 million of loan funding bringing total year-to-date loan fundings to $1 billion. Quarterly loan fundings have increased each 2025 and our bankers continue to build loan pipeline. Aldis will touch on the loan paydown headwinds we've been experiencing in his comments. Our disciplined approach to loan and deposit pricing over the last twelve months has resulted in solid margin expansion. Fully taxable equivalent net interest margin expanded three basis points during the third quarter to 3.98%, which is 11 points of margin expense expansion over the same quarter last year. The remainder of 2025, we project fully taxable equivalent net interest margin to remain in the mid-three nines and as I mentioned earlier, this does not incorporate any future interest rate decisions by the Fed. Credit quality improved during the quarter with a 20% in non-performing loans which now stand at just $27 million. Our non-performing loan ratio improved nine basis points during the quarter to 36 basis points, which is 10 basis points lower than year-end levels. As a result of proactive efforts to resolve problem loans, we realized net recoveries of five basis points annualized during the quarter. The allowance to total loans ratio remained consistent at 1.2%. Additionally, we continue to hold $18 million of March against our acquired loan portfolio which adds an additional 24 basis points of loan loss coverage if applied across the entire loan portfolio. Turning to deposits. Total deposits ended the quarter $22 million higher than the prior quarter end, and average deposits held steady at $8.2 billion. Cost of deposits totaled 2% and our total cost of funds was 2.1%. Non-interest income for the third quarter totaled $20.7 million, 21% higher than the second quarter and 13% higher than the third quarter of last year. The quarter benefited from $3.5 million of unrealized gains on partnership investments as well as higher service charges and mortgage banking income over the prior quarter. For the remainder of 2025, we project our total non-interest income to be in the range of $15 million to $17 million. We are pleased to have launched 2Unify during the quarter and we plan to provide 2Unify revenue guidance during our next quarterly earnings call. Non-interest expense totaled $67.2 million and included $1.7 million of acquisition expenses and $6.2 million of 2Unify expense. Now that we are live with 2Unify, our linked quarter 2Unify expense increased as expected, with the amortization of the associated capitalized development assets. When adjusting for the acquisition expenses, an increase 2Unify expense impacting the quarter, we remain on track to deliver the results expected from the expense reduction actions taken during the second quarter. As a result, we project core non-interest expense for the remainder of the year to be in the range of $64 million to $66 million before the impact of acquisition-related expenses. We maintain strong levels of liquidity and continue to build excess capital. We ended the quarter with a strong TCE ratio of 10.6%, Tier one leverage ratio of 11.5%, and a common equity Tier one ratio of 14.7%. We repurchased 240,000 shares during the quarter totaling $8.9 million bringing total shares repurchased year to date to 359,000 shares. During the third quarter, our tangible book value per share grew 12% annualized to $27.45. With that, I will turn the call over to Aldis. Aldis Birkans: Thank you, Nicole, good morning. Let me start by saying that our preparations for Vista merger are well and remain on track. Vista reported strong financial results for third quarter, which further validate the strategic value of this transaction and we continue to be very excited about what this partnership will bring to our combined organization. For NBH this quarter, we saw loan production return to more normalized levels with total loan funding so $421 million. Fundings were led by commercial banking, particularly in our C&I portfolio, which expanded at an annualized rate of 8.7%. This reflects a healthy rebound in client activity and continued progress in building our relationship-driven commercial franchise. While we are encouraged by this growth, overall loan portfolio outstandings were tempered by continued loan pay downs, particularly in certain CIB categories where stabilized properties have moved to permanent financing. At quarter end, our total non-owner occupied CRE to total risk-based capital ratio stood at a low 132%, reflecting a well-balanced risk profile. On pro forma basis, incorporating the pending Vista transaction we expect to remain comfortably below the 200% level. Credit metrics continue to demonstrate a stable loan portfolio with improving trends. Both classified and criticized assets declined during the third quarter. Non-performing assets decreased by another $6.3 million with the NPA ratio improving by eight basis points from the prior quarter and by 10 basis points on a year-to-date basis. Overall, we are pleased with the return to normalized loan production, the strength in our C&I portfolio, and the disciplined management of our CRE exposure, all of which position us well for sustainable high-quality growth going forward. A good example of our relationship banking success this quarter was in core deposits, which grew approximately $200 million on linked quarter spot balance basis, with nearly half of that growth coming from non-interest bearing transaction deposits. Regarding deposit costs, we expect to see a decrease in the fourth quarter as a result of actions taken in late September following the most recent Fed rate cut. We are also prepared to take additional measures should the Fed continue on its rate cutting path. One final note on deposits. In the fourth quarter, we plan to use the flexibility provided by our Camber deposits to manage our balance sheet and remain below the $10 billion threshold. Lastly, I'd like to highlight the strong performance from our longstanding FinTech partnership investments, which delivered $3.5 million in gains included in this quarter's financials. While these results from these initiatives may not always move in a straight line, we continue to expect positive financial and strategic outcomes over the long term. Tim, I'll turn it back to you. G. Timothy Laney: Thanks, Aldis. Well, we had an active third quarter. We generated $421 million in loan fundings, we had solid deposit growth, we maintained pricing discipline resulting in a net interest margin of 3.98%. We experienced a decline in classified and criticized assets accompanied by a nice decrease in non-performing assets. We grew our tangible book value per share 12% annualized during the quarter and we announced a meaningful acquisition of Vista Bank shares. And on that note, Shelly, I would ask you to open up the call for questions. Operator: Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please signal by pressing star 1 on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, please make sure your mute function is turned off to allow your signal to reach our equipment. Again, you could press star 1 to ask a question, and we'll pause for just a moment to allow everyone an opportunity to signal for questions. And we'll now take your first question coming from the line of Jeff Rulis with D.A. Davidson. Jeff Rulis: Thanks. Good morning. G. Timothy Laney: Hey, good morning. Jeff Rulis: I wanted to dig into the margin in a little more detail. The mid-three ninety guide talking about entering the quarter with some lower deposit costs. Just kind of engage with that a little bit more on what looks like rate cuts that are near certainty. The impact of which and maybe the push and pull of why at three ninety-eight you're kind of pulling it back down I suppose, absent cuts. But maybe you could touch on the expected impact there. Nicole Van Denabeele: Yes, good morning Jeff, this is Nicole. I'll mention that the third quarter's margin, it was positively impacted by about $0.5 million of interest and fees recovered on the large recovery that we had in the quarter. That was about two basis points of margin impact. So we still feel good and solid mid-3.9s margin for the quarter. Looking ahead to the potential for rate cuts in Q4, the very likely outcome of a rate cut next week. Our teams have started teeing up action to take down deposit rates in line with the Fed. We have a history of being very disciplined both on rates up and rates down cycles of managing our on both sides of the balance sheet and we are prepared to take those actions next week. And we do believe for that rate cut that deposit actions that we have planned will offset the impact of the repricing on our variable loan portfolio. Jeff Rulis: Okay, really helpful. I appreciate it. And then on the expense side, can the 2Unify step up, is that can we view that as kind of will now be in the run rate? Do you see a leg up higher again in coming quarters? Or just trying to get a little more color on the expense build if any, regarding that piece before we get kind of the revenue potential visibility in the fourth quarter call. Nicole Van Denabeele: Yeah, on the topic of 2U, expenses, that step up this quarter was expected in line with launching 2Unify. We were expecting a step up in depreciation expense of that capitalized development asset. We will continue to invest in marketing for 2Unify and then as we onboard 2Unify clients, there's a component of some variable expense that will come online as well. Jeff Rulis: I guess if Nicole if we were to zoom out a little bit and think about 26% expenses, I don't want to front run as you pull budgets. But trying to think about overall with 2Unify included, I know you've had some actions to reduce costs as well. I don't know if you could speak to overall growth of expenses expected in 2026 or just maybe frame up the push and pull of what from a jump off point of what you kind of framed up of call it $65 million core in fourth quarter? G. Timothy Laney: Jeff, this is Tim. We're in the middle of some pretty partnership discussions as it relates to 2Unify right now. And we're really not in a position to speak in more detail to what might happen there in '26. We will maintain our commitment, as Nicole mentioned, earlier, to address 2Unify one way or the other. In our fourth quarter earnings call. I would tell you even with the step up in if everything was status quo even with a step up in amortization, depreciation next year on 2Unify we will work to keep those expenses relatively flat. But that's assuming status quo and at this point, we just can't speak to any more detail on 2U. Jeff Rulis: Yep. Appreciate gonna take a little time to kinda pull that together. So thanks for the thoughts. I'll step back. Operator: Your next question is coming from the line of Kelly Molda with KBW. Kelly Molda: Hey, morning. Thanks for the question. Maybe turning back to loan growth, it was nice to see, I think you called out a step up in production. I see balances were down. Can you speak to if any of the paydowns here? I know in prior quarters, had been managing the book for credit. Was there any kind of puts and pulls related to that? And if you could provide an outlook for given what sounds like strength in the pipelines, what the expectations are ahead? What do you expect to reverse this trend now Q4? G. Timothy Laney: Thanks, Kelly. This is Tim. I'll begin and then turn it to Aldis. I would tell you that third quarter reduction volume was not driven by directive pay downs. We really think we've moved through addressing any risk in the portfolio that we felt we needed to address given the macroeconomic environment. What we've seen in the third quarter was largely heavy volume of payoffs as temporary or construction funding was going to perm with very attractive perm financing by alternative lenders. And quite frankly, we have seen private credit continue to step into the market lending money on credit terms and at pricing that you know, I've done this or call it four decades, and I just don't understand what they're doing because we've just simply seen price and credit term competition from private credit that we're not going to compete with. So I'll turn it to Aldis to talk about how we believe we're positioned to overcome that. Because we are feeling very good about our pipeline and where we now stand with our, in particular, CRE portfolio. Aldis Birkans: Yes. Thanks, Tim. And I'll just add on the Page 10 of the investor deck on the loan summary table, it actually is visible. If you look at our commercial real estate production itself was pretty healthy this quarter but embedded we kind of had I'll call it, between $100 million, $150 million headwind from pay downs that Tim was mentioning, and those are on the table above that you can see on between our originated and acquired books. Looking at the fourth quarter, our pipelines, just like entering this quarter, look very healthy, very good. We are optimistic that we return to growth subject to this behavior that we just discussed. But other than that, I'm very optimistic about fourth quarter. Kelly Molda: Got it. That's helpful. And then just on the expenses, you know, you announced the cost save plan, last July. Wondering, did we get the full benefit of that this quarter? And one. And then two, I apologize if I missed it, but how much 2Unify expenses were in Q3 as well as what's baked into that 64 to 66 for Q4. Nicole Van Denabeele: Yeah, good morning, Kelly. I'll take that one. We've been closely monitoring our progress on the expense reduction actions that we announced last quarter. And we are delivering on those commitments. You're right, Q3 was a little noisy. It was by $1.7 million of acquisition expenses, $6.2 million of 2Unify expenses, the third quarter, it was impacted by higher mortgage commissions, view that as a positive. Because it was driven by higher mortgage revenues. And then there was a couple of other timing impacts in the third quarter. We had about a $700,000 fair value adjusted on our deferred comp liability and then we were impacted by the timing of certain occupancy and equipment expenses. Kelly Molda: Got it. Thanks. I think the last thing was, how much 2Unify is in the Q4 run rate. Nicole Van Denabeele: Yeah. We in the Q4 run rate, we're expecting 2Unify expenses somewhere in the range of $7 million to $9 million and that does account for some step up in marketing spend and variable costs associated with user increases. Kelly Molda: Got it. That's helpful. Last question for me. You guys announced a really exciting acquisition last month. And it's on track to close next quarter. Wondering if you found the pace of this discussions, clearly, you're in the market, given your announcement. So wondering if you've provide us, Tim, with kind of if you've seen any flurry of inbound on the back of that announcement. Thanks. G. Timothy Laney: Kelly, I think I've slept in my own bed four nights in over the last three weeks. There have been a lot of discussions and we remain focused across our existing footprint. We would love to do more in tech and build on what John and his team at Vista have built. And we're seeing other interesting opportunities that we think could create meaningful market share step ups in markets that we already do business with. So short answer to your question is, yes, we're very active. Kelly Molda: Great. Thank you. I will step back. Operator: Next question is coming from the line of Andrew Terrell with Stephens. Andrew Terrell: Hey, good morning. G. Timothy Laney: Hey, good morning. Andrew Terrell: Tim, I wanted to ask a question around 2Unify, and I've also don't wanna, you know, front run any conversation we'll have in January and I get that, you know, maybe not too much to share here. But I guess I'm just curious from a big picture standpoint, you guys have been pretty clear on some of the expense recently associated with that. And you know, it sounds like marketing spend could ramp, and then there's also maybe a variable component as you begin onboarding clients from an expense standpoint. I'm just curious, when you look near to medium term, how long do you think it takes to generate positive operating leverage and do you feel like you have near term visibility to positive operating leverage in that business? G. Timothy Laney: I applaud you asked for asking the question, and I'll simply say again, we'll be providing all of that detail on our fourth quarter earnings call. I think I would also, and I mentioned this earlier, repeat that we're in we're literally in the middle of a very important partnership discussion that we believe could have a powerful impact on the way 2Unify forward. And it's just inappropriate to be talking about 2Unify anymore this morning. Andrew Terrell: Understood. I appreciate it. Yeah. I had to had to give it a shot there. Thank you. G. Timothy Laney: And I applaud. Andrew Terrell: I was also, you know, interested just on your discussion around private credit. And the competition you guys are experiencing there. And I'm curious, Tim, if you could share any more specifically around where you're seeing that either geographically from product type? Just any more color on where you're seeing private credit be most competitive? G. Timothy Laney: Yes. I mean, really, primarily in the commercial real estate sector. And I would tell you that's the vast majority of the action we're seeing there. Andrew Terrell: Yep. Okay. And then last one for me. Just I thought you guys bought back a little bit of stock this quarter. Your capital is still built very nicely. You'll close Vista but still have a pretty strong capital position. And I know sounds like interested in future M&A, but any interest in further capital deployment on the buyback? Aldis Birkans: Yes, Andrew, this is Aldis. So as you mentioned, we did buy $8 million or so in. We still have about $35 million, $36 million out authorization left. We'll be optimistic whether along the in sort of in light of the discussions that we're having with potential M&A targets as well. But also it'd be remiss if I didn't mention the 12% tangible book value growth this quarter that we built on top of that. $8 million buyback. So we feel very good about our capital build over the last twelve months, sit very strong excess capital levels and we are looking at potential strategic options there. Andrew Terrell: Perfect. Thank you guys for taking the questions. G. Timothy Laney: Thank you. Operator: And your next question will be coming from the line of Brett Rabatin with Hovde Group. Brett Rabatin: Hey. Good morning, everybody. I won't ask about 2Unify. Wanted to go back just to the payoffs. I know we've kinda beat that to death here a little bit too, but just wanted to make sure, you know, it sounds like you're expecting better trends in the fourth quarter, private credit aside. Does the shape of the curve on the longer end coming in here, how that impact maybe the commercial real estate portfolio? And do you have any line of sight into know, the CRE books staying? Or what's any thoughts on yield curve from here relative to that portfolio? Aldis Birkans: Not at this moment. I don't think we've seen I'll say I have not heard from our bankers that we've seen a pay down prepay, so to say, based on the refinancing opportunities and lower yields. Now that's not to say that, that doesn't come through at some time, but to date shape of the yield curve has not impacted our pay down activity. Brett Rabatin: Okay. And then the other question I had was just around the Vista deal. And, Tim, it sounds like you've been on the road quite a bit. Just was hoping to hear I know one of the aspects of the transaction that you're excited about is treasury management. Wealth, and trust. You know, any thoughts relative to the deal call on fee income and those things, specifically? G. Timothy Laney: We lost you at the end. You said any thoughts related to what? Brett Rabatin: Oh, I'm sorry. Any thoughts related to wealth, treasury management, trusts, those opportunities for the pro forma franchise? G. Timothy Laney: Well, look, first and foremost, what I'm excited about is the caliber of leadership and the quality of the new teammates coming in from Vista Bank shares. Think they've done a remarkable job taking market share and I'm in an important market like Dallas, Texas. And I don't have any reason to expect that to do anything but other than grow. I think combination of these teams is going to make us incredibly strong we're going to be leveraging key talent out of Vista across our entire organization. We remain committed to taking best practices, whether they come from NBH or Vista and running with those best practices. And we are going to be delivering frankly, a much broader suite of treasury management capabilities into Texas, into Vista with NBH's arsenal of treasury capabilities. We're super excited about what we can do in the trust and wealth management arena as a matter. Vista had been outsourcing that to a third party. Given what we're able to do with our Wyoming-based trust business in particular, and bringing those opportunities to clients in the state of Texas, just as we're doing around the rest of the franchise, I think can be monumental mean, I am genuinely that excited about it. I continue to say that what we're able to do in Wyoming for clients who are really concerned about privacy that are concerned about controlling their trust, etcetera. Is unfortunately one of the better kept secrets. But as we work to get that message out, I think we're going to continue to see exceptional growth there. Now was there one other? I hit treasury, I hit trust. Brett Rabatin: Wealth management. And really, I'll say with Vista, they've had they've built a solid private banking business and again have been outsourcing that trust and wealth management piece. And so for the opportunity to bring that in house is exciting. And Aldis, I'd ask you to comment. Aldis Birkans: Just say that we're not waiting until first quarter when we come together to start working on these partnerships. John and I have weekly calls and we bring our teams together and to the extent that they already handing off those opportunities someplace else, we'd rather be there in the fourth quarter already picking up those opportunities. So that work is underway and those synergies should be hopefully start showing their benefits here in fourth quarter. Brett Rabatin: Okay. That's all really helpful. Thanks so much guys. Aldis Birkans: Alright. Thank you. Operator: Next question is coming from the line of Kelly Molda with KBW. Kelly Molda: Hey. Thanks for letting me jump on. I think your kind of while we have you, NBH been great at managing credit. You did have that you know, one idiosyncratic loan. I think it won Q, but otherwise, it's been really strong. Tim, Aldis, I'm just wondering, the focus on NDFI lending, doesn't look like NBH has much exposure here. Wondering if you have some high level thoughts as to you know, potential risks and anything else that you might be direct analysts to more carefully watch? Thank you. Aldis Birkans: Yes. We really don't have any thoughts because we really don't have much of that well below 1%. So of total loans. Maybe that's indicative of our thoughts. G. Timothy Laney: Yes, but that's the answer. In terms of other sectors that I just think we have to continue to be watching closely in the ag space, it's commodity row crops and the vulnerability there. And it's again a space we have limited exposure to. But I mean cattle operations are probably at some of the best performance levels in history. On the other hand, commodity exposure, that would be tough place to be exposed to. We've talked about it before, but another space that continues to just face tragic headwinds is transportation. And we worked aggressively to reduce the exposure that we were concerned about there. And think that's a forgive the pun, but a long road back for those truckers. So those would be a couple of areas that you know, we I guess if we were on the investor side, we would be keeping an eye on. Kelly Molda: Got it. Thank you so much. G. Timothy Laney: You bet, Kelly. Thanks for the question. Operator: Thank you. And I'm showing we have no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to Mr. Laney for his closing remarks. G. Timothy Laney: Thank you, Shelly. I'll be brief. Just thank you so much for your time and attention this morning. Please feel free to reach out to us if you have any and we will respond promptly. Have a great day. Operator: And this concludes today's conference call. If you would like to listen to the telephone replay of this call, it will be available in approximately twenty-four hours and the link will be on the company's website on the Investor Relations page. Thank you very much and have a great day. You may now disconnect.

WD-40 (WDFC) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Technology

WD-40 (WDFC) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Wednesday, October 22, 2025 at 5 p.m. ET CALL PARTICIPANTS President and Chief Executive Officer — Steven A. Brass Vice President and Chief Financial Officer — Sara K. Hyzer Executive — Wendy D. Kelley Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email [email protected] Consolidated Net Sales -- $163 million in the fourth quarter and $620 million for the full fiscal year 2025, both reflecting approximately 5% year-over-year growth Maintenance Product Sales -- $156 million in the fourth quarter and $591 million for fiscal year 2025, each up 6% compared to the prior year and representing approximately 95% of total net sales for both periods. Gross Margin -- 54.7% for the quarter and 55.1% for the year; company noted a 730 basis point improvement in gross margin for the fourth quarter since 2021 and stated the margin would reach 55.6% for the year when excluding assets held for sale. Segment Results -- Americas sales declined 2% to $77 million for the quarter; EMEA sales increased 7% to $63 million for the quarter. Asia Pacific sales climbed 28% to $23 million in the quarter. WD-40 Specialist Sales -- Increased 18% in EMEA and 38% in Asia Pacific year-over-year; full-year global WD-40 Specialist sales grew 11% to $82 million. Home Care and Cleaning Divestiture -- U.K. Home Care and Cleaning businesses sold to Supreme Imports Limited for up to $7.5 million in an all-cash transaction completed in the fourth quarter. Full-Year Operating Income -- $98.1 million in operating income for the year, falling within guidance expectations. Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS) -- $1.56 for the quarter (up 27%) and $5.50 for the full year, both measured on a pro forma basis, excluding home care sales (non-GAAP). Adjusted EBITDA -- $30.5 million for the fourth quarter (up 16% year-over-year) and $114.4 million for the full fiscal year (up 8% year-over-year), with margins at 18% both periods. Advertising and Promotion (A&P) -- 7.6% of net sales in the quarter; $1.6 million increase in advertising and promotion expenses in the quarter compared to the same period last year 2026 Guidance -- Pro forma net sales of $630 million to $655 million (5%-9% growth) for fiscal 2026, gross margin of 55.5%-56.5% for fiscal 2026, operating income of $103 million to $110 million for fiscal 2026, and EPS of $5.75 to $6.15. Dividend and Buyback -- Quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share approved; repurchased approximately 50,000 shares for $12.3 million during the year, with $30 million remaining under the repurchase plan set to expire at year-end. Return on Invested Capital -- 26.9% for the year, improving from 25.5% in the prior year and ahead of the company’s 25% target. WD-40 Company (WDFC +1.21%) delivered record net sales and higher gross margin for fiscal year 2025, driven by strong growth in EMEA and Asia Pacific maintenance product sales and the strategic exit from low-margin home care and cleaning lines in the U.K. during the fourth quarter. Sales mix and geographic expansion factored heavily into gross margin dynamics for the quarter, with gross margin improvement above 55% for the year. The company’s guidance for fiscal 2026 calls for continued top- and bottom-line gains on a pro forma basis. Steven A. Brass indicated that operationally, the company achieved global on-time delivery of 96.4% for the year, above the current target, and inventory levels of ninety-nine days on hand, coming closer to the target of ninety days. Management stated that “Premiumized products currently account for approximately 50% of WD-40 Multi-Use Product sales and 40% of units sold,” highlighting further growth opportunity through premiumization efforts. Steven A. Brass described the digital commerce strategy as a catalyst for growth, with e-commerce sales up 10% for the year and increasing emphasis on digital platforms for brand building and education. Sara K. Hyzer confirmed that “gross margin performance this quarter was strong across all three trade blocks.” Management intends to “sustain gross margin above 55% in fiscal 2026.” The pending Americas home care and cleaning brands sale, if not completed, would add about $12.5 million in annual net sales and $0.20 to EPS, based on current projections. INDUSTRY GLOSSARY 4x4 Strategic Framework: WD-40 Company’s internal structure for prioritizing four “Must Win Battles” and four “Strategic Enablers” to drive long-term growth and operational excellence. Premiumization: Company strategy of developing and prioritizing higher-priced, value-added product formats (such as Smart Straw and Easy Reach) to drive margin expansion and customer loyalty. Assets Held for Sale: Product lines or business units (such as home care and cleaning brands) presented as separate assets on the balance sheet due to ongoing or imminent divestiture. DACH: Acronym for Germany (Deutschland), Austria, and Switzerland, considered a key geographic subregion in EMEA market commentary. Full Conference Call Transcript Wendy D. Kelley: On our call today are WD-40 Company's President, Chief Executive Officer, Steven A. Brass, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Sara K. Hyzer. In addition to the financial information presented on today's call, we encourage investors to review our earnings presentation, earnings press release, and Form 10-Ks for the period ending 08/31/2025. These documents will be made available on our Investor Relations website at investor.wd40company.com. A replay and transcript of today's call will also be made available shortly after this call. On today's call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP measures. The descriptions and reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures are available in our SEC filings as well as the earnings documents posted on our Investor Relations website. As a reminder, today's call includes forward-looking statements about our expectations for the company's future performance. Actual results could differ materially. Company's expectations, beliefs, projections are expressed in good faith but there can be no assurance that they will be achieved or accomplished. Please refer to the risk factors detailed in our SEC filings for further discussion. Finally, for anyone listening to a webcast replay, or reviewing a written transcript of this call, please note that all information presented is current only as of today's date, 10/22/2025. The company disclaims any duty or obligation to update any forward-looking information as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. With that, I'd now like to turn the call over to Steven A. Brass. Thank you, Wendy, and thanks to all of you for joining us this afternoon. Steven A. Brass: Fiscal year 2025 was marked by complexity and resilience. A tale of navigating global headwinds while making strategic progress. Despite challenges ranging from geopolitical tensions to shifting economic policies, WD-40 Company seized opportunities and continued to build on the strong foundation that has supported our success for more than seventy-two years. Today, I'll start with an overview of our sales results for the fourth quarter and full fiscal year 2025. And then provide an update on the progress we've made against our 4x4 strategic framework. Then Sara will dive deeper into our financial performance, review our business model, give an update on the divestiture of our Home Care and Cleaning businesses, and share our outlook for fiscal year 2026. After that, we'll open the floor for your questions. Today, we reported consolidated net sales of $163 million for the fourth quarter and $620 million for the full fiscal year. Each reflecting approximately 5% growth compared to the prior year. This performance represented a record quarter for the company and underscores the continued strength of our brand and the resilience of our business. As you know, maintenance products remain our primary strategic focus accounting for approximately 95% of total net sales in both the fourth quarter and the full fiscal year. Net sales for these products reached $156 million in Q4 and $591 million for the year. Each reflecting a 6% year-over-year increase. This performance is consistent with our long-term growth target of mid to high single digits and reinforces the strength of our core business. In addition, I'm pleased to report that our gross margin continues to improve and has now surpassed our target of 55%. For the full fiscal year, we delivered a gross margin of 55.1%. Gross margin would have been 55.6% if we remove the financial impact of the assets held for sale. For the fourth quarter, delivered a gross margin of 54.7%, an impressive 730 basis point improvement from 2021 when we hit our inflection point and our long-term gross margin recovery plan began to take hold. Sara will share more details about gross margin in just a few minutes. Now let's talk about fourth quarter sales results in dollars by segment starting with The Americas. Unless otherwise noted, we will discuss net sales on a reported basis compared to the fourth quarter of last fiscal year. Sales in The Americas, which includes The United States, Latin America, and Canada, decreased 2% to $77 million compared to last year. In reported currency, sales of maintenance products decreased 2% or $1.2 million to $74 million compared to last year. The decline was primarily driven by lower sales in Latin America influenced by the impacts of foreign currency exchange fluctuations, the timing of customer orders, and broader macroeconomic challenges especially in Mexico. Sales of maintenance products in The United States and Canada also down slightly primarily due to the timing of customer orders and in Canada, broader macroeconomic challenges. In The Americas, sales of WD-40 Specialist remained constant to the same period last year. Home care and cleaning product sales declined $600,000 compared to last year, reflecting our strategic shift towards higher margin maintenance products in alignment with our 4x4 strategic framework. In total, our Americas segment made up 47% of our global business in the fourth quarter. For the full fiscal year, maintenance product sales in The Americas totaled $277 million reflecting a 4% increase compared to the prior year. Although this growth was slightly below our long-term target of 5-8% annual growth for the region, we remain confident in the TradeBlock's long-term growth potential. Now let's take a look at sales in EMEA, which includes Europe, India, The Middle East, and Africa. Total sales grew 7% or $4.1 million to $63 million compared to last year. After adjusting for the impact of foreign currency translation, EMEA net sales were unchanged in the same quarter last year. In reported currency, sales of maintenance products increased 8% or $4.6 million to $60.7 million compared to last year. The strong growth is driven most significantly by higher sales volumes of WD-40 Multi-Use Product in our direct markets. Sales increased most significantly in DACH, France, and Benelux which were up 20%, 19%, and 23% respectively. Strong sales in our direct markets were offset by softer performance in our EMEA distributor markets driven by the timing of customer orders and ongoing instability in certain regions. In EMEA, sales of WD-40 Specialist increased 18% compared to last year driven primarily by increased demand and higher volumes across several direct markets especially in DACH and France where targeted promotional activity with key customers proved highly effective. Home care and cleaning product sales declined approximately $500,000 compared to the same period last year. In the fourth quarter, we completed the divestiture of our U.K. Home Care and Cleaning product businesses to Supreme Imports Limited. This strategic move allows us to sharpen our focus on higher growth, higher margin maintenance products and reinforces our commitment to growing the blue and yellow brand with a little red top. In total, our EMEA segment made up 38% of our business in the fourth quarter. For the full fiscal year, maintenance product sales in EMEA totaled $230 million, a 9% increase compared to the prior year. This growth aligns with our long-term target of 8% to 11% annual growth. Now turning to Asia Pacific. Sales in Asia Pacific, which includes Australia, China, and other countries in the Asia region, grew 28% or $5.1 million to $23 million compared to last year. Foreign currency translation had no material impact on our fourth quarter results. Sales and maintenance products increased 30% or $4.8 million to $21 million compared to last year. This growth was primarily driven by a 44% increase in sales of the WD-40 Multi-Use Products in our Asia distributor markets where we saw strong demand across nearly all countries, particularly in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and The Philippines. Fueled by geographic expansion, broader distribution, and the timing of customer orders. Sales and maintenance products also grew in Australia and China, increasing by 12% and 6%, respectively, compared to the same period last year. In Asia Pacific, sales of WD-40 Specialist increased 38% compared to last year, due to higher sales volume from successful promotions and marketing efforts in our Asia distributor markets and China. Sales of home care and cleaning products, including No Vac Carpet Cleaners and Solvol Hand Cleaners sold in Australia, increased 15% or approximately $300,000 compared to the same period last year. Our Home Care portfolio in Australia benefits from strong brand recognition, a solid competitive position, and meaningful growth opportunities. In total, our Asia Pacific segment made up 15% of our global business in the fourth quarter. For the full fiscal year, maintenance product sales in Asia Pacific totaled $84 million, a 6% increase compared to the prior year. While this growth falls short of our long-term target of 10% to 13% annual growth for the region, we remain confident in the strong fundamentals of this high-growth trade block. Now, let's take a look at the strategic progress we made in fiscal year 2025 against our 4x4 strategic framework. As you recall, this framework was designed to drive profitable growth and sustainable value creation. And is built around our four Must Win Battles and four strategic enablers. Must Win Battles focus on what we do to increase sales and profitability and these are long-term growth drivers. We will focus on full-year results. Starting with Must Win Battle number one, the geographic expansion. Global sales of WD-40 Multi-Use Product in fiscal year 2025 were $478 million, representing growth of 6% over the prior year. We experienced solid sales of our signature multi-use product brand in all three trade blocks with 8% growth in EMEA, 4% growth in The Americas, and 6% growth in Asia Pacific. We saw solid sales growth this year, 12% in Latin America, 10% in China, 14% in France, and 20% in India. But what's most important to emphasize is that we still have significant room to grow. Geographic expansion is our most significant long-term growth opportunity. Over the last five years, we've achieved an annual growth rate for net sales of WD-40 Multi-Use Product of 9.4%. Our path forward is clear. We're expanding availability across more channels and geographies while deepening product penetration by increasing brand awareness through sampling and putting more cans in the hands of end users around the world. We estimate the global attainable market for the WD-40 Multi-Use Product to be approximately $1.9 billion based on our updated benchmark sales potential. And to date, we've achieved only 25% of our benchmark growth potential, leaving a growth opportunity of approximately $1.4 billion. Our second Must Win Battle is accelerating premiumization. Innovation is at the core of this strategy. We developed products like Smart Straw and Easy Reach with our end users at the center of every decision. Their needs drive our product development efforts, enabling us to deliver high-performance solutions that solve real-world problems. End-user focused innovation fosters brand loyalty and contributes to gross margin expansion and differentiated offerings. In fiscal year 2025, global sales of Smart Straw and Easy Reach when combined were up 7% over the prior year. Premiumized products currently account for approximately 50% of WD-40 Multi-Use Product sales and 40% of units sold, leaving considerable room for continued growth. Over the last five years, we've achieved a compound annual growth rate for net sales of premiumized products of 9.4%. On a go-forward basis, we'll be targeting a compound annual growth rate for net sales of premium format products of greater than 10%. Our third Must Win Battle is to drive growth in WD-40 Specialist. This product line is a strategic extension of our trusted core brand. Designed to meet the evolving needs of professionals and industrial users. When we introduced the WD-40 Specialist alongside the WD-40 Multi-Use Product, we're not just adding variety, we're strengthening our brand, capturing new segments, and offering end users more choice without diluting what makes our core brand iconic. By leveraging the strength of the WD-40 brand, we're driving category leadership and expanding market share in adjacent segments. In fiscal year 2025, global sales of the WD-40 Specialist products were $82 million, up 11% over the prior year. Once again, we saw growth of WD-40 Specialist products across all three trade blocks with growth of 6% in The Americas, 15% in EMEA, and 12% in Asia Pacific. Over the last five years, we've achieved a compound annual growth rate for net sales of the WD-40 Specialist of 14.4%. On a go-forward basis, we'll be targeting a compound annual growth rate for net sales of WD-40 Specialist of greater than 10%. As the WD-40 Specialist has matured and its market base has expanded, we've recalibrated our long-term growth expectations to reflect the product line's evolution within its life cycle. We estimate the global attainable market for WD-40 Specialist to be approximately $665 million based on our updated benchmark sales potential. And today, we've achieved only 12% of our benchmark growth potential, leaving a growth opportunity of approximately $583 million. Our fourth and final Must Win Battle is to accelerate digital commerce. Our digital commerce strategy is a catalyst for growth across the business. Not merely a channel for online sales, it plays a vital role in advancing each of our Must Win Battles by increasing brand visibility, improving accessibility, and driving deeper engagement with end users across global markets. In fiscal year 2025, e-commerce sales increased 10%, reflecting strong momentum in our digital strategy. But digital is more than a transactional platform, it's a powerful engine for brand building and education. For example, the digital space serves as a dynamic environment for product discovery. It allows us to showcase new applications for our products while fostering peer-to-peer learning. Many of these insights originate from our end users themselves, who continually uncover innovative ways to use our products, often in ways we hadn't imagined. By leveraging digital touchpoints, we're deepening engagement, enhancing product understanding, and strengthening brand affinity across the globe. Turning to the second element of our 4x4 strategic framework, our strategic enablers. Our strategic enablers focus on operational excellence and they collectively underpin and drive the success of our Must Win Battles. Strategic Enabler number one is ensuring a people-first mindset. At WD-40 Company, our most powerful competitive advantage is the commitment of our 714 employees. We've long said we're a purpose-driven, values-guided organization, and that's not just a tagline. Our values are the foundation of our culture. They shape how we lead, how we collaborate, and how we make decisions every day. In our February 2025 Global Engagement Survey, 94% of our people reported being engaged in their work, more than four times Gallup's global average of 21%. 90% said they feel a strong sense of belonging and 95% expressed pride in our purpose, mission, and values. This deep connection to who we are and what we stand for translates directly into growth and opportunity. Nearly 40% of our people experience career progression within their first five years at the company. To our employees, thank you for consistently showing what it means to live our purpose. To create positive, lasting memories in everything you do. What our investors and stakeholders see in our performance is a direct reflection of your commitment to doing meaningful work the right way. Strategic Enabler number two is to build an enduring business for the future. At WD-40 Company, long-term value creation means operating with a clear commitment to balancing economic growth, environmental responsibility, and social impact. One of our primary objectives under this strategic enabler is to lead our category with high-performing products designed for environmental sustainability. I'm excited to share that in the upcoming fiscal year, we'll introduce a new innovation under the WD-40 Specialist product line, which will be our first bio-based format of our multi-use product. Our latest maintenance product is designed to reduce our environmental impact and to have a reduced carbon footprint, utilizing ISO standard 14,067 while still delivering the trusted performance expected from the WD-40 brand products. The product will launch in select European markets later this fiscal year, and we look forward to sharing updates with you in the quarters ahead. Strategic Enabler number three is achieving operational excellence in our supply chain. Profitable growth at WD-40 Company depends on a supply chain that is optimized, high-performing, and resilient. In fiscal year 2025, this strategic enabler played a vital role in protecting gross margins. We delivered several million dollars in economic value through cost reduction initiatives such as packaging enhancements, logistics efficiencies, and strategic sourcing. These efforts helped to offset the financial impact of tariffs, underscoring the importance of this enabler. Operationally, in fiscal year 2025, we achieved global on-time delivery of 96.4%, above our current target, and also inventory levels of ninety-nine days on hand, coming closer to our target of ninety days. Strategic Enabler number four is to drive productivity through enhanced systems. At WD-40 Company, technology is a key enabler of productivity and resilience. We're building a scalable digital infrastructure designed to support global growth and enhance operational agility, accelerating our strategic execution. By partnering with leading technology companies, we're investing in proven AI-enabled systems such as D365 and Salesforce that we believe will drive future gains in productivity. While we are taking a pragmatic approach to adopting AI across our organization, we've already identified several promising use cases that will help us to boost employee productivity, build our brand more effectively around the world, and accelerate learning and improve collaboration within our global community. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Sara. Sara K. Hyzer: Thanks, Steve, for that overview of our sales results and strategic framework. I'm pleased to share that we delivered a strong fourth quarter performance, culminating in an excellent bottom-line finish to fiscal year 2025. Today, I'll walk through how we performed against our fiscal year 2025 guidance, share insights into our business model, and highlight key takeaways from our fourth quarter financial results. I'll also provide an update on the divestiture of our home care and cleaning business in The UK and close with our outlook for fiscal year 2026. Let's start with a discussion about how we performed against our fiscal year 2025 guidance. As a reminder, we issued our guidance in fiscal year 2025 on a pro forma basis. I encourage investors to review our earnings presentation, which includes a pro forma view. Since we issued our fiscal year 2025 guidance on a pro forma basis, I will provide the following summary on a non-GAAP pro forma basis. We expect net sales growth adjusted for currency to be between 6-9%, with net sales of between $620 and $630 million over our pro forma 2024 results. Today, we reported pro forma net sales adjusted for currency of $603 million, a 6% increase over the 2024 pro forma results. If we include the assets held for sale, consolidated net sales adjusted for currency were $622 million in fiscal year 2025. We expected full-year gross margin to be in the range of 55% to 56%. Today, we reported a gross margin of 55.6%, in line with our expectations. We expected our advertising and promotion investment to be around 6% of net sales. Today, we reported an A&P investment of 6%. We expected operating income to be between $96 and $101 million. Today, we reported operating income of $98.1 million, in line with our expectations. We expected diluted EPS of between $5.30 and $5.60. Today, we reported diluted EPS of $5.50, in line with our expectations. I'm pleased with the resilience and performance of our business in what has been a volatile and uncertain environment. Throughout fiscal year 2025, we navigated a range of challenges, from tariffs and macroeconomic instability to geopolitical tensions and a shifting policy landscape. Despite these headwinds, we grew our top line, expanded margins, and delivered solid bottom-line growth. Thank you to all our employees for their focus, adaptability, and commitment to delivering meaningful results for our stakeholders. Let's start with a look at our business model. Our business model is a strategic tool we use to guide our business. The model is built around three core areas: gross margin, cost of doing business, and adjusted EBITDA. Let's look at our fourth quarter gross margin performance. In the fourth quarter, our gross margin was 54.7% compared to 54.1% last year, which represents an improvement of 60 basis points and was most significantly impacted by the following favorable factors: 110 basis points from lower specialty chemical costs, 110 basis points from higher average selling prices, including the impact of premiumization, and 60 basis points from lower input costs. Offsetting those benefits to gross margin were a few unfavorable factors: 140 basis points from unfavorable sales mix and other miscellaneous mix impacts, and 60 basis points from higher warehousing, distribution, and freight costs, primarily in The Americas. I'm happy to share that gross margin performance this quarter was strong across all three trade blocks, with results either exceeding our stated target or showing year-over-year improvement. In The Americas, gross margin increased by 70 basis points compared to the prior year fourth quarter, reaching 53.2%. EMEA held steady at 55.5%, remaining above our target. And in Asia Pacific, gross margin increased by 110 basis points compared to the prior year fourth quarter, reaching 57.5%. For the full fiscal year, gross margin was 55.1%, compared to 53.4% last year, which represents an improvement of 170 basis points. As Steve mentioned earlier, we're very encouraged by the consistent improvement to gross margin we've seen over the past three years. Today, we're proud to report full fiscal year gross margin over the high end of our targeted range of 50% to 55%, recovering our gross margin a year ahead of schedule and marking a significant milestone in our recovery journey. It's important for stakeholders to understand that while certain risks, such as cost volatility, tariff uncertainty, and inflationary pressures, will always be part of the operating environment, we're actively pursuing a range of initiatives designed to help us mitigate those risks and strengthen gross margin over time. These include supply chain cost reduction projects, cost optimization efforts, progress on asset divestitures, new product introductions, premiumization strategies, and geographic expansion. Each of these levers contributes positively to gross margin and reinforces our confidence in its long-term potential. Supported by our current performance and strategic initiatives, we're confident in our ability to sustain gross margin above 55% in fiscal year 2026. In addition, gross margin enhancement remains a key priority for senior leaders who continue to be incentivized to drive further improvement. Now turning to our cost of doing business, which we define as total operating expenses plus adjustments for certain non-cash expenses. Our cost of doing business is primarily driven by three key areas: strategic investments in our people, global brand-building efforts, and freight expenses associated with delivering products to our customers. In the fourth quarter, our cost of doing business was 36% compared to 38% in the prior year quarter. In dollar terms, our cost of doing business remained relatively stable period over period. For the full fiscal year, the cost of doing business was 37% compared to 36% last year. In dollar terms, our cost of doing business increased $19 million or 9% period over period. In the fourth quarter, advertising and promotion expenses increased $1.6 million or 15% period over period. As a percentage of net sales, A&P investment was 7.6% this quarter compared to 7% in the same period last year. The phasing of our A&P investments is not evenly distributed over the course of the year. And in recent years, our brand-building activities have been more heavily weighted in the second half of the year. For the full fiscal year, our A&P investment remains within our annual expectations. While our long-term goal is to manage the cost of doing business within the 30% to 35% range, we continue to make thoughtful strategic investments to support long-term growth. WD-40 Company has long been committed to operating with discipline and efficiency, a commitment reflected in our ability to manage the business with just 714 employees, each generating approximately $860,000 in revenue. This level of productivity speaks volumes about the strength of our culture, the effectiveness of our operating model, the awareness of our brand, and the value we deliver across our global footprint. What continues to evolve is our need to operate as a global business in an increasingly complex and uncertain environment. To reduce risk and drive top-line growth, we've implemented a number of structural changes in recent years to strengthen and sustain our business for the future. We're investing with discipline across technology, sustainability, innovation, research and development, legal risk management, and brand building to strengthen our foundation, build brand awareness, and ensure long-term resilience and growth. We also need time to absorb the loss of revenues associated with the home care and cleaning divestitures. These investments have pushed our cost of doing business above our target range. However, we believe they've strengthened the business, enhanced its resilience, and positioned us to deliver sustainable long-term value to our stakeholders. Turning now to adjusted EBITDA margin. We believe adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of sales is a valuable metric for assessing both profitability and operational efficiency. It reflects our operating performance and cash-generating ability, providing the clearest view of our company's underlying financial health. Our 25% target for adjusted EBITDA margin is a long-term aspiration. However, we continue to believe we can move adjusted EBITDA margin back to our mid-term target range of 20% to 22% once we have absorbed the loss of revenues associated with the home care and cleaning divestitures. In the fourth quarter, our adjusted EBITDA was $30.5 million, up 16% from the same period last year. Our adjusted EBITDA margin this quarter was 18% compared to 17% in the same period last year. For the full fiscal year, our adjusted EBITDA was $114.4 million, up 8% from the same period last year. Adjusted EBITDA margin this year was 18%, which is the same as last year. Now let's turn to other key measures of our financial performance: operating income, net income, and earnings per share in the fourth quarter. Operating income improved to $28 million in the fourth quarter, an increase of 17% over the prior period. Net income improved to $21.2 million in the fourth quarter, an increase of 27% compared to the prior period. Diluted earnings per common share for the quarter were $1.56 compared to $1.23 in the prior period, reflecting an increase of 27% over the prior period. Our diluted EPS reflects 13.6 million weighted average shares outstanding. Now let's review our balance sheet and capital allocation strategy. We maintain a strong financial position and healthy liquidity, enabling a disciplined capital allocation approach that both fuels long-term growth and generates significant value for our stockholders. Maintaining a disciplined and balanced capital allocation approach remains a priority for us. For the foreseeable future, we expect CapEx of between 1-2% of sales per fiscal year. Our cash flow from operations this quarter was $30 million, and we elected to use approximately $9.5 million of that cash to pay down a portion of our short-term higher interest rate borrowing. Although our usual target for debt to adjusted EBITDA is one to two times, we are currently slightly below that range. This provides us with strategic flexibility as we explore opportunities to return capital to stockholders and drive long-term growth. We continue to return capital to our stockholders through regular dividends and buybacks. Annual dividends will continue to be our priority and are targeted at greater than 50% of earnings. On October 9, the Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.94 per share. During fiscal year 2025, we repurchased approximately 50,000 shares of stock at a total cost of $12.3 million under our share repurchase plan. We have approximately $30 million remaining under our current repurchase plan, which is set to expire at the end of this fiscal year. Looking ahead, we intend to accelerate our buyback activity and fully utilize the remaining authorization, underscoring our strong conviction in the long-term fundamentals of the business. We're focused on accretive capital returns that reflect our confidence in the long-term value of our stock. In fiscal year 2025, excluding the positive impact of the one-time non-cash income tax adjustment, our return on invested capital was 26.9%, improving from 25.5% last fiscal year and ahead of our target of 25%. Steven A. Brass: In September, we announced the sale of our 1001 and 1001 Carpet Fresh brands in The UK to Supreme Imports Limited, a Manchester-based consumer products company. The all-cash transaction valued at up to $7.5 million was completed in 2025. WD-40 Company is providing limited transition services for up to three months. This divestiture reflects our continued focus on optimizing our portfolio and directing resources toward areas that drive long-term value. We continue to make progress on the sale of our America's home care and cleaning product brands. Our investment base continues active discussions with multiple potential buyers. Although there's no certainty of the deal, we remain optimistic, and I will provide further updates as appropriate. Now moving to FY '26 guidance. Given the anticipated divestiture of our America's Home Care and Cleaning brands, we are continuing to present this year's guidance on a pro forma basis excluding the financial impact of the assets held for sale. We're also providing a pro forma view of fiscal year 2025 excluding the brands we divested in The UK in the fourth quarter, the brands currently held for sale, and the impact of the one-time tax benefit recorded in the second quarter, to help with modeling and period-over-period comparison. Please refer to our fourth quarter and full-year earnings presentation on our Investor Relations website for those details. Now with that backdrop, let's take a closer look at our guidance for fiscal year 2026. We're excited about what lies ahead in fiscal year 2026. By balancing strong performance today with thoughtful investments for tomorrow, we're building a foundation for lasting growth and long-term value creation. For fiscal year 2026, we expect net sales growth from the pro forma 2025 results is projected to be between 5-9% with net sales between $630 and $655 million after adjusting for foreign currency impact. Gross margin is expected to be between 55.5-56.5%. Advertising and promotion investment is projected to be around 6% of net sales. Operating income is expected to be between $103 and $110 million, representing growth of between 5-12% from the pro forma 2025 results. The provision for income tax is expected to be between 22.5-23.5%. And diluted earnings per share is expected to be between $5.75 and $6.15, which is based on an estimated 13.4 million weighted average shares outstanding. This range represents growth of between 5-12% over the pro forma 2025 results. This guidance assumes no major changes to the current economic environment. Unanticipated inflationary headwinds and other unforeseen events may affect our view of fiscal year 2026. In the event we are unsuccessful in the divestiture of The Americas Home Care and Cleaning brands, our guidance would be positively impacted by approximately $12.5 million in net sales, $3.6 million in operating income, and $0.20 in diluted EPS on a full-year basis. That completes the financial overview. Sara K. Hyzer: Now I would like to turn the call back to Steven A. Brass. Thank you, Sara, for that update. Steven A. Brass: As we close another fiscal year at WD-40 Company, I'm reminded how fortunate we are to lead such a remarkable business. We have a world-class brand with a sustainable competitive advantage, a highly diversified global footprint, and a long runway for growth. Our capital-light efficient business model generates significant cash, providing a strong financial foundation that allows us to invest in growing our brands and accelerate the development of our future leaders while continuing to prioritize returning capital to our investors. And if that's not enough, what did you hear from us on this call? You heard that we reported currency-adjusted pro forma net sales of $603 million, a 6% increase over FY 2024 results and right in line with our expectations. You heard that sales of our maintenance products were up 6% in both the fourth quarter and fiscal year and that this performance aligns with our long-term growth target. You heard that we estimate the benchmark sales opportunity for WD-40 Multi-Use Product to be approximately $1.9 billion and that we have achieved only 25% of that benchmark opportunity. You heard that we estimate the benchmark sales opportunity for WD-40 Specialist to be approximately $665 million and that we've achieved only 12% of that benchmark opportunity. You heard that we sold our UK home care and cleaning product brands. You heard that the full fiscal year delivered a gross margin of 55.1% or 55.6% if we remove the financial impact of the assets held for sale. You heard that for the fourth quarter, delivered a gross margin of 54.7%, an impressive 730 basis point improvement from 2021. You heard that supported by current performance and our strategic initiatives, we believe we're well-positioned to target a gross margin of above 55% in FY 2026. You heard that by looking ahead to fiscal year 2026, we intend to accelerate our buyback activity and fully utilize the remaining authorization, underscoring our strong conviction in the long-term fundamentals of the business. And you heard that we're issuing guidance for fiscal year 2026 on a pro forma basis excluding the brands we expect to divest this year. Thank you for joining our call today. We'd now be pleased to answer your questions. Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, please make sure your mute function is turned off to allow your signal to reach our equipment. If your question has been answered and you would like to withdraw your registration, please press the pound key then the number one on your telephone keypad. Your first question comes from the line of Daniel Rizzo from Jefferies. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Daniel Rizzo: I just need a clarification. So when you guys gave your initial guidance last year, that excluded the home care sales. Same thing as this year. But when you reported throughout the year, you reported including the home care sales. Is that correct? Sara K. Hyzer: Hi, Daniel. Yes. So in the press release and in the 10-Q, you'll see those include them, obviously, because those are reported on a GAAP basis or U.S. GAAP basis. In the investor deck on every quarter, we showed a pro forma view so that you could back out those sales, although you can easily see those sales in our footnotes because we do break out the HCCP sales in both The Americas and EMEA regions. But the pro forma view went a step further to take you all the way down in the P&L, you could actually see the impact down to EPS. Daniel Rizzo: Okay. So I'm looking at now. So the pro forma is $5.50 in EPS in 2025. Right? Sara K. Hyzer: That's correct. Daniel Rizzo: Alright. Sorry. I just wanted clarification on that. Thanks. Thank you for that. So then with you mentioned that I said kind of a mixed headwind. I was wondering if you could provide color on that. I mean, I've assumed the premiumization is kind of a mixed tailwind, but I was wondering what's kind of countering that you pointed out in the gross margin. Sara K. Hyzer: Oh, on the gross margin from a tailwind for the year? Daniel Rizzo: Well, you said there was a mixed headwind there and all the things. I was wondering what that what that what you're referring to. Sara K. Hyzer: Oh, I think the mixed what I, so maybe it clear. The mix is a sales mix and other miscellaneous sales or other miscellaneous mix impact. So yes, so the premiumization, if you look at it for the full year, it's more for the quarter, the impact for the quarter, the sales mix, and other miscellaneous mix impacts had a headwind of about 140 basis points. Daniel Rizzo: I'm sorry. Was just looking what exactly that is. Is that, like, is that I mean, just going distributor versus direct or how? Sara K. Hyzer: It's a mix. So, yes, it's a mix of both, how the market play out, so direct and distributors, but then there is also a mix of product. So premiumization, into that, but also bulk and specialist and MUPs. It's just a general product sales mix in addition to the market mix. Daniel Rizzo: Okay. And then my final question, you know, with premiumization, that's doing fairly well with the multi-use product. I wonder if premiumization like an easy reach straw or something like that would be applied to, like, the specialist product line. Is that something that's being considered? Or are we kind of far from that, or how we should think about it? Steven A. Brass: Hey, Daniel. It's Steve. And so the specialist the specialist yeah. The whole specialist line, you know, sells at a higher gross margin as well. So effectively, that is a premium. Every kind of the WD-40 Specialist we sell is margin accretive. And so that is a separate form of premiumization. Having said that, we already in several countries around the world, we've also launched particularly Easy Reach delivery system on things like our penetrant product, which you have in The U.S. and one or two other countries around the world. And so and certainly, Smart Straw, we leverage as part of our specialist premiumization strategy. So yes, it applies to both the core product and to specialists as well, Dan. Daniel Rizzo: Alright. Thank you very much. Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Keegan Cox from D.A. Davidson. Your line is open. Hi, guys. Keegan on for Michael Allen Baker today. Keegan Cox: I just wanted to ask if you could, you know, give any color or thoughts on potential gross margin headwinds and tailwinds that you're expecting within your 2026 guidance? Sara K. Hyzer: Hi, Keegan. This is Sara. So yes, I would say in our guidance, we have, you know, we have built in both headwinds and tailwinds. We are seeing stability from a cost input standpoint. And when you look at what we've built into our gross margin guidance, if oil stays at the levels that they're at right now, that could be a small tailwind for us since we've tried to be a little bit conservative in what we've built in for an oil assumption because you just never really know which direction that is going to go. There are a number of cost-saving initiatives that we have in the pipeline based on actions that we've taken in FY 2025. That will feed into FY 2026 along with new actions that we've built around cost supply chain optimization and continuation of the efforts that we've had in FY 2025 on the sourcing side. We had a lot of success this year from a global sourcing standpoint and our cost savings expectations that we had this year. Some of those will then benefit our margin going into FY 2026. Keegan Cox: Got it. And then as I looked at kind of the sales results in Asia Pacific specifically, say that five times, it looks like the distributors accounted for, you know, most of the growth there. What did kind of the runway left for, I guess, the that distributor market? Steven A. Brass: Sure. It's a very, very long runway. And so China also had a good well, all three areas were up, right? So Australia, I believe, was up 6% for the year. China was up in double digits. And then yes, for the fourth quarter in particular, we had a very strong comeback in distributor. And so as we look at all of those markets, there's a very, very long runway for growth. In places like Indonesia, where we've introduced our new kind of hybrid business model, it's been growing at a CAGR of around 20% over the past few years. Many of those other key markets across the Asia region have a very, very long runway for growth. And so the improved performance in the back half in Asia and there may be some kind of impact in terms of customer distributors are a little more lumpy, right? And so going into the first quarter, you may see some kind of pullback. That's just really, again, kind of inventory management in Asia for Q1. But beyond that, we see a really strong rebound in Asia Pacific later in the fiscal year. Keegan Cox: Got it. Thank you. Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude our conference for today. We thank you for your participation on today's conference call. We ask that you please disconnect your line.

LendingClub (LC) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Technology

LendingClub (LC) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Wednesday, October 22, 2025 at 5 p.m. ET Call participants Chief Executive Officer — Scott C. Sanborn Chief Financial Officer — Drew LaBenne Head of Investor Relations — Artem Nalivayko Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email [email protected] Originations -- $2.62 billion in originations for Q3 2025, representing 37% year-over-year growth, and the highest quarterly level in three years. Revenue -- $266 million revenue for Q3 2025, up 32% year over year, fueled by expanded marketplace sales volumes and all-time high net interest income. Marketplace revenue -- 75% year-over-year growth to $108 million, reaching its highest point in three years, driven by loan sale volume lift and improved sale prices. Pre-provision net revenue -- $104 million pre-provision net revenue for Q3 2025, up 58% year over year. Net interest income -- $158 million net interest income for Q3 2025, an all-time record, supported by a $11.1 billion balance sheet. Net interest margin -- 6.2%. Non-interest expense -- Non-interest expense was $163 million for Q3 2025, up 19% year over year compared to Q3 2024 due primarily to increased marketing spend. Net income -- Net income was $44 million for Q3 2025, with diluted EPS of $0.37. Return on tangible common equity -- 13.2% (non-GAAP) for Q3 2025, exceeding management's guidance. Tangible book value per share -- $11.95 tangible book value per share. Deposit balance -- $9.4 billion total deposits for Q3 2025, slightly lower with a $100 million decrease in brokered deposits nearly offset by relationship deposits; LevelUp savings balances approaching $3 billion. Provision for credit losses -- $46 million for provision for credit losses, in line with stable credit and portfolio growth, factoring in longer-duration new businesses. Net charge-off ratio -- 2.9%, with future increases expected as loan vintages season. Structured certificate sales -- Over $1 billion sold in Q3 2025. BlackRock commitment -- Memorandum of understanding for up to $1 billion in loan purchases through 2026. Member base -- Now surpasses 5,000,000, with monthly app logins from borrowers up nearly 50%. LevelUp checking performance -- 7x increase in account openings versus the prior product, with nearly 60% of new account holders also being borrowers. Q4 2025 originations guidance -- Management projects $2.5 billion to $2.6 billion in new originations for Q4 2025, indicating year-over-year growth of 35%-41%. Q4 2025 outlook for ROTCE -- Expected range of 10%-11.5% in Q4 2025. Outlook for pre-provision net revenue -- Anticipated to be $90 million to $100 million in Q4 2025, inclusive of continued marketing investment. LendingClub (LC 1.20%) reported record net interest income and the highest originations and marketplace revenue in three years, attributing these results to product innovation, credit outperformance, and a growing member base. Management highlighted that demand for loans and marketplace products remains robust, with the company closing a memorandum of understanding earlier in the quarter with BlackRock for up to $1 billion in purchases through 2026. The shift to higher loan sale prices, significant engagement with new digital products, and continued funding cost optimization are central to LendingClub's current and projected operational momentum. LaBenne noted, "The business is firing on all cylinders, demonstrating the earnings power of our digital marketplace bank model." Management expects continued expansion through both balance sheet and marketplace channels, with a goal to "feed all of our desires to grow the balance sheet and we can feed all the investors in the marketplace that are paying the appropriate price." New rated products tailored for insurance capital, and the development of repeat member channels, are expected to bolster future loan sale pricing and acquisition efficiency. LendingClub intends to provide further strategic and financial guidance during the upcoming Investor Day on November 5. Industry glossary Structured certificates: Securitized pools of loans sold to institutional investors, often tailored to meet the investment criteria of specific buyers such as insurance companies. Held-for-investment (HFI): Loans retained on the company's balance sheet intended for ongoing investment income, rather than immediate sale. Held-for-sale extended seasoning portfolio: Loans held on the balance sheet past their initial origination period, aged to improve investor confidence and pricing, and designated for future marketplace sale. Pre-provision net revenue: A profitability metric calculated as total revenue less non-interest expenses, excluding provisions for credit losses. Return on tangible common equity (ROTCE): Net income divided by average tangible common equity, measuring profitability for ordinary shareholders while excluding intangible assets. Full Conference Call Transcript Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining us. And welcome to the LendingClub Corporation Q3 2025 Earnings Conference Call. After today's prepared remarks, we will host a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please raise your hand. If you have dialed in to today's call, please press 9 to raise your hand, 6 to unmute. We will now hand the conference over to Artem Nalivayko, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Artem Nalivayko: Thank you, and good afternoon. Welcome to LendingClub Corporation's third quarter 2025 earnings conference call. Joining me today to talk about our results are Scott C. Sanborn, CEO, and Drew LaBenne, CFO. You can find the presentation accompanying our earnings release on the Investor Relations section of our website. On the call, in addition to questions from analysts, we will also be answering some of the questions that were submitted for consideration via email. Our remarks today will include forward-looking statements, including with respect to our competitive advantages, demand for our loans and marketplace products, and future business and financial performance. Our actual results may differ materially from those by these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause these results to differ materially are described in today's press release and earnings presentation. Any forward-looking statements that we make on this call are based on current expectations and assumptions, and we undertake no obligation to update these statements as a result of new information or future events. Our remarks also include non-GAAP measures related to our performance, including tangible book value per common share, pre-provision net revenue, and return on tangible common equity. You can find more information on our use of non-GAAP measures and a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measures in today's earnings release and presentation. Finally, please note all financial comparisons in today's prepared remarks are to the prior year-end period unless otherwise noted. And now, I'd like to turn the call over to Scott. Scott C. Sanborn: Thank you, Artem. Welcome, everybody. We delivered another outstanding quarter with 37% growth in originations, 32% growth in revenue, and a near tripling of diluted earnings per share. Innovative products and experiences, compelling value propositions, a 5,000,000 strong member base, consistent outperformance on credit, and a resilient balance sheet are all coming together to deliver sustainable, profitable growth. I'm excited to share more on our vision and our many competitive advantages at our upcoming Investor Day in two weeks, so I'll keep it brief today. Quarterly originations of $2.62 billion came in above the top end of our guidance, reflecting strong demand from both consumers and loan investors, our increased marketing efforts, and the power of our winning value proposition and customer experiences. With competitive loan rates enabled by our sophisticated credit models and a fast, frictionless process, we continue to be very successful at attracting our target customers. In fact, when our loan offers are made side by side on a leading loan comparison site, we close 50% more customers on average than the competition. We continue to be disciplined in our underwriting. Our asset yield remains strong, and our borrower base continues to perform well. In fact, we're delivering our originations growth while also demonstrating roughly 40% outperformance on credit versus our competitor set. Consistent strong credit performance on a high-yielding asset class has allowed us to confidently build our balance sheet, which now stands at over $11 billion, delivering a durable, resilient revenue stream that nonbanks can't replicate. In fact, this quarter we generated our highest ever net interest income of $158 million, enabled by a growing balance sheet and expanding net interest margin. Our loan marketplace is also thriving, with our reputation for strong credit performance and innovative solutions attracting marketplace investors at improving loan sales prices. We grew marketplace revenue by 75% to our highest level in three years and had our best quarter ever for structured certificate sales totaling over $1 billion. We also secured earlier in the quarter a memorandum of understanding by which funds and accounts managed by BlackRock would purchase up to $1 billion through LendingClub Corporation's marketplace programs through 2026. What's more, our new rated product, specifically designed to attract insurance capital, is capturing strong interest, which should help us to continue to improve loan sales prices and further boost marketplace revenue. As excited as I am about our financial performance, I'm equally excited about what we're seeing in member engagement and behavior. Our mobile app, combined with high engagement products and experiences like LevelUp checking and DebtIQ, are successfully encouraging members to visit us more often and are driving new product adoption. We launched LevelUp checking in June as the first-of-its-kind banking product designed specifically for our borrowers. Members are responding positively, with a 7x increase in account openings over our prior checking product. In a recent survey, 84% of respondents said they were more likely to consider a LendingClub Corporation loan given the offer of 2% cash back for on-time payments through LevelUp checking. And what's really encouraging is that nearly 60% of new accounts being opened are being opened by borrowers. Our efforts are driving a nearly 50% increase in monthly app logins from our borrowers, and with that engagement, an increasing portion of our repeat loan issuance is now coming through the app. That's proof that these investments are enabling lower-cost acquisition from repeat members, keeping pace with our new member growth as we continue to ramp our marketing efforts. We'll share more examples at Investor Day of how our intentional product design, coupled with an engaging mobile experience, is creating a flywheel to increase lifetime value. Before I turn it over to Drew, I want to thank all LendingClubbers for their incredible execution and dedication to improving banking for our more than 5,000,000 members. Their efforts are paying off, and I look forward to building on our momentum. With that, I'll turn it over to you, Drew. Drew LaBenne: Thanks, Scott, and good afternoon, everyone. We delivered another outstanding quarter, extending the momentum we built throughout the first half of the year. For the third quarter, we generated improved results across all key measures, including originations, revenue, profitability, and returns. Total originations grew 37% year over year to over $2.6 billion, reflecting the impact of our growth initiatives, scaling of our paid marketing channels, and continued expansion of loan investors on our marketplace platform. Revenue grew 32% to $266 million, driven by higher marketplace volume, improved loan sales prices, and expanding net interest income. Pre-provision net revenue, or revenue less expenses, grew 58% to $104 million, reflecting the scalability of our model. The net impact of all these items is that we nearly tripled both diluted earnings per share and return on tangible common equity to $0.37 per share and 13.2%, respectively. The business is firing on all cylinders, demonstrating the earnings power of our digital marketplace bank model. Now, let's turn to Page 12 of our earnings presentation. We will go further into originations growth. We delivered our highest level of originations in three years. Borrower demand remained strong, as the value we are providing in the core use case of refinancing credit card debt continues to be compelling. Loan investor demand also remains strong, with marketplace buyers looking to increase orders and prices steadily improving. Demand for our structured certificate program continues to grow as we added the rated product attracting new insurance capital. In addition to $1.4 billion of new issuance sold, we also sold $250 million of seasoned loans out of the extended seasoning portfolio, which included a rated transaction supported by Insurance Capital. Our consistently strong credit performance sets us apart from the competition and is one of the reasons we have been able to sell all of these loans without any need to provide credit enhancements. Leveraging one of the benefits of being a bank, we grew our held-for-sale extended seasoning portfolio to over $1.2 billion, consistent with our strategy to grow our balance sheet while maintaining an inventory of seasoned loans for our marketplace buyers. Finally, we retained nearly $600 million on our balance sheet in Q3 in our held-for-investment portfolio. Now let's turn to the two components of revenue on Page 13. Non-interest income grew 75% to $108 million, benefiting from higher marketplace sales volumes, improved loan sales prices, continued strong credit performance, and lower benchmark rates. Fair value adjustment of our held-for-sale portfolio benefited by approximately $5 million in the quarter from lower benchmark rates. Net interest income increased to $158 million, another all-time high, supported by a larger portfolio of interest-earning assets and continued funding cost optimization. The growth in this important recurring revenue stream is expected to continue into the future as we leverage our available capital and liquidity to further grow the balance sheet. If you turn to Page 14, you will see our net interest margin improved to 6.2%. We continue to see healthy deposit trends, and total deposits ended the quarter at $9.4 billion, a slight decrease from last year. The change was primarily attributable to a $100 million decrease in brokered deposits, which was mostly offset by an increase in relationship deposits. LevelUp savings remains a powerful franchise driver, approaching $3 billion in balances and representing the majority of our deposit growth this year. We are maintaining a disciplined approach to deposit pricing while providing meaningful value for our customers. Turning to expenses on Page 15, non-interest expense was $163 million, up 19% year over year. As we signaled last quarter, the majority of the sequential increase was driven by marketing spend as we continue to scale, test, and optimize our origination channels to support continued growth in 2026. We continue to generate strong operating leverage on our growing revenue, and our efficiency ratio approached an all-time best in the quarter. Let's move on to credit, where performance remains excellent. We continue to outperform the industry with delinquency and charge-off metrics in line with or better than our expectations. Provision for credit losses was $46 million, reflecting disciplined underwriting, stable consumer credit performance, and portfolio mix. Our net charge-off ratio improved modestly again this quarter to 2.9%, and we continue to see strong performance across our vintages. I would highlight that the net charge-off ratio also continues to benefit from the more recent vintages we've added to the balance sheet. We expect the charge-off ratio to revert upwards to more normalized levels as these vintages mature. These anticipated dynamics are already factored into our provision. On Page 16, you will see that our expectation for lifetime losses is also stable to improving across all vintages. Turning to the balance sheet, total assets grew to $11.1 billion, up 3% compared to the prior quarter. Our balance sheet remains a competitive strength, allowing us to generate recurring revenue through retained loans while maintaining the flexibility to scale marketplace volume as loan investor demand grows. We ended the quarter well-capitalized with strong liquidity and positioned to fund future growth without raising additional capital. Moving to Page 17, you can see that pretax income of $57 million more than tripled compared to a year ago, hitting a record high for the company. Taxes for the quarter were $13 million, reflecting an effective tax rate of 22.6%. We continue to expect a normalized effective tax rate of 25.5%, but we may have some variability in this line due to the timing of stock grants and other factors. Putting it all together, net income came in at $44 million, and diluted earnings per share were $0.37, which nearly tripled compared to a year ago. Importantly, return on tangible common equity of 13.2% showed continued improvement and came in above the high end of our guidance range, and our tangible book value per share now sits at $11.95. As we look ahead, the business enters the fourth quarter with significant momentum. Loan investor demand remains strong, loan sales pricing continues to trend higher, and our product and marketing initiatives are driving high-quality volume growth. As a reminder, in Q4, we typically see negative seasonality on originations due to the holiday season. With that in mind, we expect to deliver originations of $2.5 to $2.6 billion, up 35% to 41% year over year, respectively. Our outlook for pre-provision net revenue is $90 million to $100 million, up 21% to 35%, respectively. Our outlook assumes two interest rate cuts in Q4 and includes increased investment in marketing to test channel expansion, which will support originations growth in future quarters. We expect to deliver an ROTCE in the range of 10% to 11.5%, more than triple year over year. We will provide additional details on our strategic and financial framework at our Investor Day on November 5, where we hope you will join us. With that, we'll open it up for Q&A. Operator: We will now begin the question and answer session. A reminder that if you would like to ask a question, please raise your hand now. And star six to unmute. Your first question comes from the line of Bill Ryan with Seaport Research Partners. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Bill Ryan: Hello. I think you're on mute. Drew LaBenne: Got it. Operator: Thanks. So first question, I just want to ask about the disposition plans. Looking into the future between your various channels, structured certificate, whole loans, and extended seasoning, and what your plans are to continue to grow the held-for-investment portfolio on the balance sheet. Looks like there's a little bit of mix shift last couple of quarters, dialing back on the whole loan sales, focusing on the other two. And if you could also kind of maybe talk about the economics of what you're seeing between the various disposition channels. Drew LaBenne: Yeah. Great. Hey, Bill. Thanks for the question. So, you know, for HFI for Q4, it's kind of steady as she goes in terms of what we plan each quarter. So we're targeting, you know, roughly $500 million in HFI, and that sort of just depends on how the quarter evolves. Sometimes that's a little higher, a little lower. I'd say, generally, it's been a little higher the past couple of quarters. The other programs are roughly in line with where we've been for the past couple of quarters. We see demand for structured certificates being strong. We're seeing good pickup in the rated product as well, and we, as I mentioned, we sold one of those out of extended seasoning this quarter, a rated deal that is. So demand is strong and still there, and with issuance being targeted to be roughly the same, kind of the mix and disposition should also be roughly the same. I guess, Bill, to make sure you're tracking, you probably are. Not all of these sales are equal. Historically, whole loan sales to banks would come at a different price than, say, whole loan sales to an asset manager. As the insurance-rated transactions have been coming in, those prices, as we mentioned in the script, are really approaching bank prices now. And in those cases, we're generally not retaining the A note. So effectively, it is a whole loan sale, and it's coming at a higher price. So it's really the mix is based on where we're getting the best execution, and, you know, we are looking to certain channels. So that's a channel we're developing, and it's going in the direction we like, which is building demand and higher prices there. Bill Ryan: Okay. Thanks, Scott. And just one big picture follow-up. If you can maybe kind of touch on the competitive state of the market. I mean, origination volumes have increased quite a bit across the board. You've heard about some companies maybe have opened their credit boxes a little bit. Some with product structure, if you will. Fixed income investors' allocation more capital to the sector. I mean, if you could kind of give us an overview of have you seen any pressure on your underwriting standards at all? Scott C. Sanborn: No. We haven't. I'd say, you know, as we say every quarter, this has always been a competitive space. In our case, our growth is coming off of a low, and it's coming off of a low that's been informed not just by tighter credit underwriting, which, you know, we're maintaining the discipline there, but also because we just pulled back on marketing. So our ability to grow is if you still look at, you know, where you can see volume levels, you'll see we're still running below historical levels of spend and volume. In a TAM that's larger than it ever was. So we're not seeing the space as competitive. It's no more competitive than it was last quarter or the quarter before. As usual, we see a mix in who we're competing with in different environments. So when the interest rate environment shifted, we were competing more with banks and less with fintechs. I'd say now we're competing a bit more with fintechs and a little bit less with some of the banks, but that doesn't it's not changing, certainly not affecting our underwriting standards. You know, we are absolutely in this for the long game. And as you know, we're bringing our own cooking here. So we are looking to make sure we are delivering the returns for ourselves as well as for our loan buyers, and we don't view the way we get rewarded long term is by posting a temporary jump in growth through short-term making on credit. Bill Ryan: Okay. Thanks for taking my questions. Operator: Next question comes from the line of Tim Switzer with KBW. Tim, your line is open. Please go ahead. Tim Switzer: Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. My first one is, can you explain what drove the higher loss in the net fair value adjustment? And, you know, I think you mentioned earlier on the call that pricing seems to be holding up on loan sales. So just curious what drove that adjustment line. Drew LaBenne: Yeah. So keep in mind, we had a positive fair value adjustment in Q2 that I believe was about $9 million in the quarter, and we had $5 million this quarter. So positive adjustments in both quarters, but it was larger in Q2 than it was in Q3. And so that's a big part of the delta right there. You know, as I said, prices moved up a little bit, so it's not price that's driving that. The other piece is as we have a larger extended seasoning portfolio, there is natural roll down that happens, and that comes through that net fair value adjustment line. So that's also a little bit of the change that we're seeing quarter over quarter. It's just a larger portfolio. Tim Switzer: Got you. Is there a good way for us to be able to model the impact of the extended seasoning portfolio? Drew LaBenne: There is. It's probably a little complicated to get into the details on this call, but we can follow up with you afterwards. Tim Switzer: Appreciate that. We can do it offline. Scott C. Sanborn: Yeah. Tim Switzer: And then can you also walk us through the loan reserve dynamic a bit this quarter because it went up quite a bit, but if we look at your slide 16, that indicates lower loss expectations for those legacy vintages, I guess, and you obviously didn't grow the HFI book a whole lot. So I'm just curious on, you know, what was that reserve going up for, I guess? Drew LaBenne: Yep. So two factors. Again, last quarter, there was a one-timer that we called out in the provision line because we had a re-estimation of the lifetime losses, and that caused a positive benefit in the provision line. And so I think there's about $11 million. Right, Artem? Yeah. $11 million last quarter that you know, credit was great again this quarter, but we didn't do a change in the reserve on the previous vintages. So that's one factor. The other is just as we're growing some of our businesses, like, for example, our purchase finance business into HFI, the duration's a little longer, so it has a little higher upfront CECL charge, but also fantastic economics on balance sheet. And so those are the two main drivers. Tim Switzer: Gotcha. Thank you. And, one last one real quick. Can you explain what drove the increase in diluted shares? And the period went up a little bit, but not nearly as much as diluted share count. Sorry if you said this earlier on the call. Drew LaBenne: Yeah. No. I think share price is probably the biggest factor. Right? If you just do the treasury, if you just think of the treasury stock method on the diluted shares, the higher the share price, the more dilution you effectively get on the outstanding, you know, grants that have been issued. So there wasn't there was no step change in terms of kind of the, you know, the vehicles that cause diluted share count. Tim Switzer: Got you. Alright. Thank you. Drew LaBenne: Thank you. Operator: Next question comes from the line of Giuliano Bologna. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Giuliano, your line is open. Please go ahead. Joanna, I think you're on mute too. Okay. We can come back to Giuliano. We'll move on to Vincent Caintic of BTIG. Line is open. Please go ahead. Vincent Caintic: Hi. Great. Can you hear me? Scott C. Sanborn: Yes. Vincent Caintic: Yes. Having some tech issues. I have a feeling maybe others are as well. But yeah, so thank you for taking my questions. First question, kind of a follow-up on that funding side. And I want to ask it, kind of the demand for, you know, your marketplace loans, the structured certificates, and the seasoned portfolio. It's great to see that there's so much demand. And, you know, I think a lot of there's been a lot of investor questions over the past months where, you know, we've seen some other companies have some issues, some bankruptcies, and so forth. And so there's been some concerns broadly about institutional investor appetite for fintech-originated loans. So it looks like your demand is great. And I was wondering if you can maybe talk about kind of the broad industry and if you're seeing any differentiation. And if maybe that's a competitive advantage of your funding vehicles and mechanisms versus the rest of the industry. Thank you. Drew LaBenne: Yes. So thanks for the question, Vincent. A lot there. So I'd say, first of all, the comments I'm going to make are really just focused on our asset class in our industry, so not, you know, auto securitizations or any of the other things that are going on. But, you know, we just actually our team was just at a conference yesterday talking to, you know, loan current investors and potential investors, and I'd say the appetite is still very strong. I don't think there's any fade on the appetite at all for, you know, the various vehicles that are out there, whether it's a structured product, the rated product, or, you know, whole loans out of extended seasoning. So demand is definitely there. I think track record matters. So the demand is there for us. I think it's certainly there for other issuers as well. But I'd say on the margin that issuers are also being maybe slightly more cautious on who they're partnering with, and we're hearing that in we've been the partner of choice for years, and I think continue to be. So I think that plays to our advantage. Obviously, we're always watching the ABS markets to see if there's any, you know, major disruption there. And haven't seen much. Certainly, there's been a little noise, as you indicated, over the past couple of weeks, but in summary, demand remains good. Prices are strong, so we're feeling good going into the fourth quarter. Vincent Caintic: Okay. Great. Thank you. That's very helpful. And I guess also, real okay. Scott C. Sanborn: Just a little added color. We're certainly hearing that some capital providers are further narrowing their selection of who they're working with. But, you know, hard for us to kind of but, you know, we remain in the wallet and remain a really primary important partner there, but certainly hearing some chatter of that. Vincent Caintic: Okay. Great. That's super helpful. Thank you. And, actually, kind of related to, you know, the volatility we've been hearing over the past month just in broader consumer credit. Just wondering if you could talk about, you know, your credit performance and what you're seeing. So it was great to see charge-offs at 2.9% this quarter. That's great. Just wondering if you're noticing maybe not in the loans that you're that are on your balance sheet already. But as you get applications, maybe has the quality of that changed? Are you noticing maybe any themes in terms of delinquency evolution like, maybe with lower credit tiers or any comments you might say be seeing with that relative to press trend? Scott C. Sanborn: Yeah. No. I mean, I'd say for us, you know, reminder, we remain very, very restrictive compared to, you know, pre-COVID. And that is even more so the case in sort of the lower credit area. So I acknowledge there's definitely been a decent amount of press about a bifurcated economy and, you know, where certain subsets of consumers could be struggling. But, you know, in our portfolio, given how we're underwriting today, I mean, just for an example, there's talk about, you know, consumers earning less than $50k a year. I think that represents 5% of our originations right now. So very, very small. Same thing with student loans. As you know, we've restricted underwriting to that group. So the percent of that are, you know, delinquent on a student loan and current on us is, you know, now measured in basis points and is shrinking. So we on our book aren't seeing anything more than the normal kind of, you know, variability that you adapt and continue to manage to, which our platform is set up and our team is set up to do that quite well. So no not, you know, no kind of broad themes. Despite, again, we're reading the same thing you are, but we're not seeing it in our book. And I think that's based on how we're underwriting. Vincent Caintic: Great. Thanks. And maybe I'll sneak one more in, and this might end up having to be for the investor meeting. We want to leave some meat on there. But your CET1 of 18% is very healthy. I'm just wondering how much is too much. Thank you. Drew LaBenne: We'll see you in November. Vincent Caintic: Sounds good. Alright. Thanks, guys. I appreciate it. See you then. Drew LaBenne: In all seriousness, I think what you know, a little bit on that is, we do have what we would say is some excess capital, and our plan is to use that for growing the balance sheet as we ramp up originations. And, you know, if we have enough capital to satisfy that primary goal and more than enough after that, then I think we'll consider other options. Vincent Caintic: Okay. Great. And see you November 5. Thanks very much. Operator: Okay. Thank you. Our next question comes from Giuliano Bologna from Compass Point. Your line is now open. Giuliano Bologna: Sounds good. Hopefully, you guys can hear me now. I have the unmute notification this time. Congratulations on a great quarter. You know, it's great to see that, you know, continued, you know, great results. When I look forward, I mean, there's obviously a tremendous amount of demand, you know, through the marketplace, whether structured certificates or whole loan sales. I'm curious in a sense how much more do you think you'd want to grow that versus grow the kind overall HFI pie? Because, you know, the outlook is called 45% between HFI and extended seasoning. Which is a pretty, you know, healthy amount, and it looks like that could, you know, keep growing balances. But just trying to think about, you know, how you think about the balance going forward because you have a lot of dry powder, a lot of liquidity, a lot of capital to kind of keep pushing. So I'm curious how you think about how much you do want to, you know, push both sides there? Drew LaBenne: Yeah. And we'll get into this more at investor day. So but to give you an answer now for, you know, for Q4, the or even longer term. I mean, the end goal is to grow originations enough that we can feed all of our desires to grow the balance sheet and we can feed all the investors in the marketplace that are paying the appropriate price for the loans we're originating. So our goal is to be able to do both. And then, you know, if we're not quite there on total originations, then it's a bit of a balancing act. Right? We still want to see healthy growth on the balance sheet, but we originate loans that are better off in the marketplace on the sheet, and we're going to sell those. And we have long-term investors that we want to keep our relationship with, so we're going to make sure we're able to allocate to them as well. So, you know, always a bit of a balancing act while we're still ramping originations. The end goal is we have enough originations to feed both sides. Giuliano Bologna: That's very helpful. One thing I'm curious about, when I look at your marketing spend, as a percentage of volume, it, you know, came up a little bit, but it's still, you know, much lower than I would've expected, you given that pushing some new marketing channels. I mean, I'm calculating it, you know, 1.55%, 1.553%. You know, you obviously, you know, highlighted that you're gonna push a little bit more harder on the marketing side. In April, you know, in anticipation of, you know, growth in '26. Scott C. Sanborn: Know, looks like, you know, I mean, HFI was down, so there should be, you know, a little bit less of a benefit from more, you know, capitalization or amortization of that through, you know, on HFI. But seems like that's, you know, continued to be very efficient, you know, from a, you know, percentage of volume perspective. I'm just curious, you know, how I should think about that, you know, going over going forward over the next few quarters. Scott C. Sanborn: Yeah. So as I mentioned, I think we, you know, excitedly, I'd say we still see a lot of opportunity there. Right? We are coming from a place of reasonably low activity into a market that I think is pretty attractive in terms of the value proposition to the consumer, the experience we've got. We, you know, it's our efforts are working well. We are still, I mean, we're only two quarters into restarting direct mail as an example. We're on the third version of our response model. We will be on our fourth as we exit the year, you know, building the creative optimization library, optimizing the experience, and, you know, then take that across some of the other channels like digital and all the rest. So we still have a lot of opportunity in front of us. I think what you're also seeing in Q3 is not just the performance of those channels being, you know, positive. But also some of our other efforts. I touched on it in my prepared remarks. Our other we are growing, you know, we delivered 37% growth year on year. That was both in new and in repeat marketing over indexes to driving new. But repeat is coming at a, you know, much lower much lower cost. So our ability to scale that at an equivalent pace, we're still at fifty to jump in year on year marketing spend. We're still, you know, drive roughly fifty with new versus repeat. So both of those efforts are working in the external marketing efforts. And then the efforts to drive repeat and lifetime value from our customers. Giuliano Bologna: That's very, very helpful. I appreciate it. And, yeah, congrats on team performance. I'm looking forward to seeing you guys, you know, in a couple of weeks. Scott C. Sanborn: Great. Thanks, Giuliano. Operator: Thank you. And your next question comes from Reggie Smith of JPMorgan. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Reggie, your line is open. Reggie Smith: You're on mute, Reggie. Reggie Smith: There we go. Can you hear me now? Scott C. Sanborn: Yes. Reggie Smith: I'm sorry. I wanted to follow-up on the last question. So kind of thinking about marketing, you know, obviously, it costs less to reengage a previous customer. I guess thinking about that expense ratio, you know, the 1.5 that we see on the income statement, my sense is that it's not evenly distributed and that, you know, maybe your incremental or your marginal loan is a little bit more. Help me understand, I guess, how inefficient that is, or where is the marginal cost to underwrite a loan? And then maybe frame that against you could sell one for. Like, it's my sense and my gut is that despite the fact that your marketing channels are not optimized, that it's still, there's still room there to kind of go, almost as though you're leaving money on the table possibly. Not in a bad way, but just thinking about the opportunity there. So maybe talk a little bit about what the marginal cost to acquire a new loan is and then maybe frame that against, you know, what you can sell these loans for. Looks like origination, your marketplace ratio is about 5%. So there seems to be a lot of room there. But anything you could share there would be great. Thank you. Scott C. Sanborn: Yeah. So you're certainly thinking about it the right way. We're underwriting marginal cost of acquisition that reflects the lifetime value of the customer. And, you know, the part of this process, you know, book. And what we are very, very focused on is profitable sustainable growth. Right? We're not looking to just post inefficient volume that we can't rinse and repeat and drive further. So as we push into these new channels, we're where we'll find that efficient frontier and then we work to basically bring it in, right, by improving our targeting models, improving our creative and response rates, improving our pull-through on the experience and the conversion rate on the experience so that we can then go deeper and push harder in those channels. So I think you're right that we have more room to go, but it is very mathematically and or scientifically backed. Right? We've got a very good handle on what we can expect to get from our customers. Now that number is going up. Right? As we and we'll share a little bit more info on this. But as we get better and better, you know, these repeat customers are not only lower cost to acquire, they're also lower credit loss. And, oh, by the way, if we get you back once, it's likely we're gonna get you back three or four times. So, you know, there really is a real long-term benefit here. That will drive up the lifetime value, which will drive up our ability to pay up at acquisition, but we're building towards it. And we're building towards it incrementally every quarter. Reggie Smith: That makes sense. And if I could sneak one more in, I'd love to hear more about the BlackRock program and the insurance sales channel. If I'm thinking about that right, I guess, this is a way for civilians to get exposure to these types of notes? Like, is the liquidity there for the consumer, are they able to sell that stuff back? Like, how does that kind of work? And then on the insurance side, like, do you think we'll get to a point where you're announcing, you know, a committed number from the insurance channel, like you do for, you know, kind of private credit today? Thank you. Drew LaBenne: Yeah. So a couple of things there. One, this is not direct-to-consumer sales that's happening. This is really, you know, in the BlackRock example, I think they have many different ways that they may, you know, represent other clients where they're managing money to purchase this program. So I wouldn't want to box it into just one use case for them, but it's not a, you know, direct or indirect to consumer investors that's happening in any way. I think the insurance pool is extremely deep. And so, you know, these are insurance companies who are taking premiums for various insurance policies and investing that money. So, you know, it's a massive pool. It is, as Scott was saying, it usually, the price is not quite as good as banks, but generally, it's still a very low cost of capital. And so we think we can make progress in terms of growing that channel and helping our overall price that we're selling loans at as well. Reggie Smith: And I guess on the direct-to-consumer point, is that possible? Maybe not with BlackRock, but is that, like, a channel that one day could be a thing, or are there things that prevent that, regulatory-wise, that would prevent that or make that difficult? Scott C. Sanborn: So there is capital in our loan book today that is provided by it's usually coming through funds that are managed by RIAs at some of the wealth managers and, you know, hedge funds and all the rest. So there is private individual investor capital coming in to purchase the asset. So that's one. Going direct to consumer retail would be, you know, going back to our original model. And if you recall, you know, it is doable. Then the loans become securities, which comes with a lot of overhead and disclosure requirements, and we have been able to operate a much better business without that because what I mean by that is you we are required to announce when we make pricing changes. We're required to announce when we make credit changes. We had all of our competition downloading our publicly available data and using it to compete against us because we had to tell them what we were doing. So it's not something I would gladly go back in that old structure. But, certainly, high net worth individual through funds is a source of capital today. I was thinking about how I would love to pick up some yield versus what I get in my savings account now. Reggie Smith: So I think there's something there. I don't know. Scott C. Sanborn: We could open it up. Reggie Smith: Thanks a lot. Listen. Great quarter, guys. We'll talk soon. Thanks. Drew LaBenne: Thanks. Operator: Thank you. And a reminder that if you'd like to ask a question, please raise your hand. Our next question comes from Kyle Joseph of Stephens. Line is open. Please go ahead. Kyle Joseph: Hey. Good afternoon. For taking my questions. You guys have touched on this a bit, but just looking at Slide 10 and kind of delinquency trends amongst FICO bands. Obviously, at least amongst the competitor set, you saw a pretty big increase on the lower band there. Just give us a sense for how that impacts your originations, and investor demand, and, you know, where you're seeing kind of the best bang for your buck in terms across the FICO band score? Scott C. Sanborn: Yeah. So that doesn't directly affect us, as I touched on before. You know, we're certainly hearing some chatter about maybe people consolidating with a smaller handful of originators that have shown themselves to have more stable and predictable performance. What we're always looking at is what does the application profile look like coming at us? Is it shifting? Is it shifting in a way we like, we don't like? So, you know, when you see an uptick like that, it's generally gonna result in somebody else pulling back. It's we don't know. Is that one platform too? Three? Like, hard for us to say, but we'll be monitoring and adapting to is making sure we continue to get a consistent through-the-door population. And that we want. And because it may provide some opportunity. It might provide some risk, and that's part of, you know, what our day job is. Kyle Joseph: Got it. Helpful. And then, just one follow-up for me. Talked a lot about marketing expenses today, but just, you know, and imagine you'll cover this at the investor day as well. But just, you know, a sense for the operating leverage you have on the remaining expense items. Drew LaBenne: Yeah. We think it's pretty significant. We will get into it more at investor day. I think you can already see it happening right now in terms of, you know, the revenue growth we've produced year over year compared to expenses. And that's certainly not to say that other expenses won't go up as we grow the company. But I think marketing is where you'll see the most variable cost as we scale up. Kyle Joseph: Got it. That's it for me. Thanks very much for taking my questions. Scott C. Sanborn: Great. Operator: Thank you for your questions. I will now turn the call to Artem for some questions via email. Artem Nalivayko: Alright. Thanks, Kevin. So Scott and Drew, we've got a couple of questions here that were submitted by our retail investors. First question is, we noticed a difference in origination growth rate across issuers and originators. To what do you attribute differences in growth? Scott C. Sanborn: Yeah. So first, thanks to all the retail investors for submitting. I understand from Artem that we got quite a few this quarter, so that's great. Yeah. As we talked about on the call, not all originations are created equal. Our focus is on profitable sustainable originations growth, and, you know, I think 37% growth in originations to a level that's, you know, really getting close to our highest over the last several years. Is also coming with record high pretax net income and also coming with outperformance on credit by 40%. So it's we're not just looking at one number, which is dollars originated year on year. We're looking at a combined balance of what we think makes for a sustainable, profitable business. Artem Nalivayko: Perfect. Alright. Second question. You talked a little bit about a potential rebrand coming up. Any updates on the status? Scott C. Sanborn: Yep. I'm only talking about it because you all keep asking. But I would say we're yes. We have done quite a bit of work this year, and we're in the final stages of the let's call it, the research and development phase and landing on, you know, where we want to take it. Very excited about it. We're now entering the planning and execution phase. Which we're gonna be pretty deliberate about, as it won't surprise anyone on this call. We built up equity in this brand after almost twenty years. We think a new brand will give us a broader permission set with our customer base and kind of create new opportunities for us, but we gotta make sure we don't lose the, you know, tens of thousands of positive reviews and awards and our conversion rate that we finally honed across all these channels and so lots of work to do. So when will it be, you know, out in the ether will be probably of next year. Don't hold me to that date exactly, but we're doing the planning phase to make sure we know exactly what we're gonna get and can support it with the, you know, marketing oomph that it's gonna need to be successful. Artem Nalivayko: Alright. Perfect. And last question. Just any updates on the product roadmap or launching any new products? Scott C. Sanborn: Yeah. So, obviously, this year, as we've been getting back to growth, we've also been, you know, expanding our ambitions on the product mix. We talked about LevelUp checking on the call today. Of savings has been a big driver, which I think Drew talked about that IQ this year. So there is absolutely more to come. That's part of the reason we're gonna be investing in a new brand. What I'd say is, you know, stay tuned for investor day where we'll talk a little bit more about some opportunities we're gonna be pursuing in the years to come. Artem Nalivayko: Alright. Perfect. Thanks, Scott. Alright. So thank you, everyone. With that, we'll wrap up our third quarter earnings conference call. Thanks again for joining us today. And if you have any questions, please email us at [email protected].

TrustCo (TRST) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Technology

TrustCo (TRST) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2025, at 9 a.m. ET CALL PARTICIPANTS Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer — Robert J. McCormickChief Financial Officer — Michael M. OzimekChief Banking Officer — Kevin M. CurleyNeed a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email [email protected] Net Income -- $16.3 million in net income, up 26.3% year over year, reflecting continued profitability growth.Return on Average Assets -- 1.02%, a 21.4% year-over-year increase, indicating higher earnings efficiency.Return on Average Equity -- 9.29%, up 20% year over year, demonstrating improved shareholder returns.Efficiency Ratio -- Decreased nearly 9% year over year.Book Value Per Share -- $37.30, an increase of 6% from $35.19 in 2024's Q3.Nonperforming Loans -- Declined to $18.5 million from $19.4 million a year ago, underscoring asset quality improvements.Nonperforming Loans to Total Loans -- 0.36% versus 0.38% compared to Q3 2024, a positive movement in credit quality.Coverage Ratio -- Over 280%, a 9% rise compared to Q3 2024, supporting the allowance for credit losses.Loan Growth -- Average loans rose 2.5% ($125.9 million) to $5.2 billion, reaching a record level.Home Equity Loans -- Increased by 15.7% year over year to $59.9 million, marking the strongest segment expansion.Residential Mortgage Loans -- Up $34 million in the residential real estate portfolio, contributing to overall portfolio growth.Commercial Loans -- Increased $34.6 million, a 12.4% gain year over year, highlighting commercial loan momentum.Total Deposits -- Ended at $5.5 billion, up $217 million compared to Q3 2024, pointing to solid deposit attraction.Net Interest Income -- $43.1 million in net interest income, an 11.5% increase ($4.4 million) driven by margin expansion.Net Interest Margin -- 2.79%, up 18 basis points, reflecting improved asset-liability management.Yield on Interest-Earning Assets -- 4.25%, an increase of 14 basis points.Cost of Interest-Bearing Liabilities -- 1.9%, down from 1.94%Share Repurchase Program -- 467,000 shares bought year to date (298,000 in the quarter); capacity for 533,000 more shares.Wealth Management Division -- $1.25 billion in assets under management; division accounted for 41.9% of non-interest income.Non-Interest Expense -- $26.2 million, down $42,000 from the prior year quarter.ORE (Other Real Estate) Expense -- $8,000 for the quarter, significantly reduced from $204,000 compared to Q3 2024.Shareholder Return Philosophy -- McCormick said, "It is our view that the stock is significantly undervalued and presents an outstanding investment opportunity without exposing us to the risks inherent with another investment."CD Portfolio Repricing -- McCormick said, "The highest rate we're offering right now, Ian, is 4%," with about $1 billion in CDs coming due at an average rate of 3.75% over the next four to six months.Charge-Offs -- Net recovery of $176,000, showing continued credit strength.Branch Network -- Flat at 136 branches sequentially; expansion focus on Pasco County, Florida, and Downstate New York.Allowance for Credit Losses -- $51.9 million with a 281% coverage; up from $49.95 million and an increase of 157% compared to a year ago. TrustCo Bank (TRST +1.96%) reported substantial gains in both net income and net interest income, supported by strong asset quality metrics and steady growth across residential and commercial lending segments. Management completed nearly half of a 1-million-share repurchase plan, citing perceived undervaluation. Margin and efficiency improvements coincided with disciplined cost management and broad deposit growth. The wealth management division's non-interest income, representing nearly 42% of the total, was fueled by $1.25 billion in assets under management.Management anticipates additional share buybacks upon exhausting the current authorization, describing an ongoing focus on long-term shareholder value.CD repricing is expected in the upcoming quarters as $1 billion at a 3.75% average rate matures over the next four to six months, with new issues offered up to 4%.Loan growth was achieved without increasing credit risk, as evidenced by net charge-off recoveries and rising coverage ratios. INDUSTRY GLOSSARY ORE (Other Real Estate): Real estate owned by the bank, typically acquired through foreclosure, pending resale or resolution. Full Conference Call Transcript At this time, I'd like to turn the conference call over to Mr. Robert J. McCormick, Chairman, President, and CEO. Please go ahead. Robert J. McCormick: Morning, everyone, and thank you for joining the call. I'm Robert J. McCormick, President of TrustCo Bank Corp NY. I'm joined today as usual by Michael M. Ozimek, our CFO, who will go through the numbers, and Kevin M. Curley, our Chief Banking Officer, who will talk about lending. It is often said that actions speak louder than words. TrustCo Bank Corp NY's performance this quarter and year to date speaks volumes about the tactical effective application of our corporate strategic vision. TrustCo Bank Corp NY's mission is to deliver the best possible loan and deposit products, making the dream of home ownership come true for customers who we treat with respect. It is a fundamental principle of our company that loans are underwritten with professionalism and care to ensure fair lending outcomes and solid credit quality. This is true both in our residential and commercial lending areas. Looking back just five years, we have never exceeded annualized net charge-offs of more than 0.02% compared to our average loan portfolio. Throughout this year, our strong customer relationships have enabled us to grow deposits and loans while holding the line on cost of funds as the loan portfolio repriced. All of these elements have combined to generate these stellar financial results we proudly announced today. Both our profitability and efficiencies improved greatly over the quarter, compared to this time last year. Our return on average assets increased 21.4%, return on average equity grew 20%, and our efficiency ratio decreased by almost 9%. This is all done while staying focused on high-quality underwriting standards and loan processing functions, sticking to our lending philosophy by never sacrificing credit quality. We improved our nonperforming loans to total loans by 5% over the quarter, and our coverage ratio increased to over 280%, up 9% from the third quarter last year. Also, part of our longstanding TrustCo tradition, we do not rest upon our successes. Throughout this year, our management team has demonstrated we are not satisfied with simply delivering outstanding corporate performance in the present term. We always have an eye on building long-term shareholder value. Toward that end, we sought and received approval to repurchase 1,000,000 shares of our company's stock. So far, we have repurchased nearly half of that number. Further, we anticipate that the company will complete the currently authorized buyback and expect to seek approval for further substantial repurchase. It is our view that the stock is significantly undervalued and presents an outstanding investment opportunity without exposing us to the risks inherent with another investment. Could not be more pleased with the driving corporate value in the safe, sound, and strategically purposeful manner. Now Michael will go over the details with the numbers, and some impressive numbers. Michael? Michael M. Ozimek: Thank you, Robert, and good morning, everyone. I will now review TrustCo Bank Corp NY's financial results for the 2025Q3. As we noted in the press release, once again, the company saw strong financial results for the 2025Q3, marked by increases in both net income and net interest income of TrustCo Bank Corp NY during the 2025Q3 compared to the 2024Q3. This performance is underscored by rising net interest income, continued margin expansion, and sustained loan and deposit growth across key portfolios. This resulted in third-quarter net income of $16.3 million, an increase of 26.3% over the prior year quarter, which yielded a return on average assets and average equity of 1.02% and 9.29%, respectively. Capital remains strong. Consolidated equity to assets ratio was 10.9% for the 2025Q3, compared to 10.95% in the 2024Q3. Book value per share at 09/30/2025 was $37.30, up 6% compared to $35.19 a year earlier. During the 2025Q3, TrustCo Bank Corp NY repurchased 298,000 shares of common stock under the previously announced stock repurchase program, resulting in 467,000 shares repurchased year to date, and we have the ability to repurchase another 533,000 shares under the repurchase program. And as always, we remain committed to returning value to shareholders through a disciplined share repurchase program, which reflects our confidence in the long-term strength of the franchise and our focus on capital optimization. Credit quality continues to improve. As we saw nonperforming loans decline to $18.5 million in the 2025Q3 from $19.4 million in the 2024Q3. Additionally, nonperforming loans to total loans also decreased to 0.36% in the 2025Q3, from 0.38% in the 2024Q3. Nonperforming assets to total assets also reduced to 0.31% in the 2025Q3 compared to 0.36% in the 2024Q3. Our continued focus on solid underwriting within our loan portfolio and conservative lending standards positions us to manage credit risk effectively in the current environment. Average loans for the 2025Q3 grew 2.5% or $125.9 million to $5.2 billion from the 2024Q3, an all-time high. Consequently, overall loan growth has continued to increase, and leading the charge was the home equity credit lines portfolio, which increased by $59.9 million or 15.7% in the 2025Q3 over the same period in 2024. The residential real estate portfolio increased $34 million or 0.8% of average commercial loans, which also increased $34.6 million or 12.4% over the same period in 2024. This uptick continues to reflect a strong local economy and increased demand for credit. For the 2025Q3, the provision for credit losses was $250,000. Retaining deposits has been a key focus as we navigate through 2025Q3. Total deposits ended the quarter at $5.5 billion and was up $217 million compared to the prior year quarter. We believe the increase in these deposits compared to the same period in 2024 continues to indicate strong customer confidence in the bank's competitive deposit offerings. The bank's continued emphasis on relationship banking combined with competitive product offerings and digital capabilities has continued to stable deposit base that supports ongoing loan growth and expansion. Net interest income was $43.1 million for the 2025Q3, an increase of $4.4 million or 11.5% compared to the prior year quarter. Net interest margin for the 2025Q3 was 2.79%, up 18 basis points from the prior year quarter. The yield on interest-earning assets increased to 4.25%, up 14 basis points from the prior year quarter, and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 1.9% in the 2025Q3 from 1.94% in the 2024Q3. The bank is well-positioned to continue delivering strong net interest income performance even as the Federal Reserve signals a continued potential easing cycle in the months ahead. The bank remains committed to maintaining competitive deposit offerings while ensuring financial stability and continued support for our communities' banking needs. Our wealth management division continues to be a significant recurring source of non-interest income. They had approximately $1.25 billion of assets under management as of September 30, 2025. Non-interest income attributable to wealth management and financial services fees represent 41.9% of non-interest income. The majority of this fee income is recurring, supported by long-term advisory relationships and a growing base of managed assets. Now on to non-interest expense. Total non-interest expense net of ORE expense came in at $26.2 million, down $42,000 from the prior year quarter. ORE expense net came in at an expense of $8,000 for the quarter as compared to $204,000 in the prior year quarter. We are going to continue to hold the anticipated level of ORE expense to not exceed $250,000 per quarter. All of the other categories of non-interest expense were in line with our expectations for the third quarter. Now Kevin will review the loan portfolio and non-performing loans. Kevin M. Curley: Mike, good morning to everyone. Our loans grew by $125.9 million or 2.5% year over year. The growth was centered on our home equity loans, which increased by $59.9 million or 15.7% over last year, and residential mortgages, which increased by $34 million. In addition, our commercial loans grew by $34.6 million or 12.4% over last year. For the second quarter, actual loans increased by $35.1 million as total residential loans grew by $38.5 million, and commercial loans were slightly lower for the quarter. Overall, residential activity is picking up. We are seeing additional refinance volume as mortgage rates remain in the 6% range. Our home equity lending also continues to grow steadily as customers continue to use their equity for home improvements, education expenses, or paying off higher-cost loans such as credit cards. In all our markets, rates have fluctuated within a 25 basis point range, with our current thirty-year fixed rate mortgage at 6.125%. In addition, our home equity products are very competitive, with rates starting below 6.75%. Our products are well situated across our markets, as we are ready to capture more growth as activity picks up. As a portfolio lender, we have the flexibility to manage pricing and implement targeted promotions to increase loan volume. Overall, we are encouraged by the loan growth in the quarter and remain focused on driving stronger results moving forward. Moving to asset quality. Asset quality of the bank remains very strong. At TrustCo Bank Corp NY, we work hard to meet strong credit quality throughout our loan portfolio. As a portfolio lender, we have consistently used prudent underwriting standards to build our loan portfolio. Our residential loans originated in-house, focusing on key underwriting factors that have proven to lead to sound credit decisions. These loans are originated with the intent to be held in our portfolio for the full term rather than originated for sale. In addition, we have no foreign or subprime loans in our residential portfolio. In our commercial loan portfolio, which makes up just about 6% of our total loans, we focus on relationship-based loans secured mostly by real estate within our primary market area. We also avoid concentrations of credit to any single borrower or business and continue to require personal guarantees on all our loans. Overall, our disciplined underwriting approach has produced strong credit quality across our entire loan portfolio. Here are the key metrics. Our early-stage delinquencies for our portfolio continue to be steady. Charge-offs for the quarter amounted to a net recovery of $176,000, which follows a net recovery of $9,000 in the second quarter and $258,000 in recovery in the first quarter, totaling a year-to-date net recovery of $443,000. Non-performing loans were $18.5 million at this quarter-end, compared to $17.9 million last quarter and $19.4 million a year ago. Non-performing loans to total loans was 0.36% this quarter-end, compared to 0.35% last quarter and 0.38% a year ago. Non-performing assets were $19.7 million at quarter-end versus $19 million last quarter and $21.9 million a year ago. At quarter-end, the allowance for credit losses remained solid at $51.9 million with a coverage ratio of 281%, compared to $51.3 million with a coverage ratio of 286% at year-end and $49.95 million with a coverage ratio of 157% a year ago. That's our story. We're happy to answer any questions you might have. Operator: Thanks very much. We will now begin the question and answer session. Before pressing the keys, our first question comes from Ian Lapey from Gabelli Funds. Your line is open, Ian. Please go ahead. Ian Lapey: Good morning, Robert and team. Congratulations on the great financial results. I was hoping maybe you could quantify a little bit. The release mentions that you expect meaningful net interest income upside for quarters to come. You mentioned the rates on the fixed rate and home equity. What about the CDs that are going to be maturing over the next quarter? What's sort of the average rate for that compared to what you're paying on new CDs that you're issuing? Robert J. McCormick: The highest rate we're offering right now, Ian, is 4%, and that's a three-month rate. And there's about a billion dollars in CDs that are coming due over the next four to six months. So we expect, based on what happens with the Fed and some competition, there should be opportunity in that CD portfolio to reprice. Ian Lapey: What's roughly the average, so for the billion coming due, what is the average roughly rate on those? Robert J. McCormick: The average rate on the billion coming due is about 3.75%. Okay. And then on the recoveries, obviously, very impressive. I was just hoping you could unpack that a little bit. For example, for the quarter, in New York, you had $194,000 in recoveries. Just curious, like how many homes typically would that relate to? Is this just a function of borrowers defaulting with significant equity still in the home? Maybe you can just explain a little bit. Robert J. McCormick: A lot of that, as you can imagine, Ian, in the real estate market, Upstate is still very, very strong, and there's still great demand with relatively limited inventory. So a lot of the transactions happened before we even end up taking the property back, which is the best possible scenario. But the $194,000 is probably around five properties we've taken back, and I think there was one commercial property in there and four residentials. Ian Lapey: Okay, great. And then I guess my only follow-up, my only remaining question. So it looked like branches were flat at 136 sequentially. What are you thinking about in terms of expansion, if at all, and would Florida still be sort of your targeted range for growth? Robert J. McCormick: We're looking at, well, Pasco County is something that we're very interested in, Ian. I'm sure you're tracking this, but on the West Coast of Florida, because of development and prices and things like that, people are being pushed further and further out from Tampa. We're seeing opportunity in loan demand in Pasco County. And then there are a couple of other infill locations that we would like to find something in Florida. But, you know, we are pretty cheap people, so we want the right transaction if we can in the right location. So and then there's always opportunity throughout Downstate New York as things open up there as well. So those would be the two opportunities we're seeing right now. Ian Lapey: Okay. Terrific. Thank you. Operator: Thank you. We currently have no further questions at this time. Now I'd like to turn the conference back to Robert J. McCormick for any closing remarks. Robert J. McCormick: Thank you for your interest in our company, and we hope you have a great day. Thank you. Operator: The conference call has now concluded. Thank you very much for attending. You may now disconnect your lines.

QuantumScape QS Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Technology

QuantumScape QS Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Wednesday, October 22, 2025 at 5 p.m. ET Call participants President and Chief Executive Officer — Siva Sivaram Chief Financial Officer — Kevin Hettrich Head of Investor Relations — Dan Conway Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email [email protected] Ducati launch program milestone -- QuantumScape (QS 12.89%) unveiled a real-world demonstration of QSC5 technology in the Ducati V21L motorcycle at IAA Mobility, initiating field testing as the next phase. COBRA-based QSC5 B1 shipments -- First shipments of COBRA-based QSC5 B1 samples commenced, completing a 2025 operational objective and supporting the Ducati program launch. Eagle Line progress -- Higher-volume cell production equipment for the Eagle Line pilot line was partly installed, with the remainder on schedule for the year. Customer engagement expansion -- New joint development agreement established with an existing automotive customer; active commercial engagement now includes a new top 10 global automotive OEM. Corning and Murata agreements -- Partnerships with Corning (NYSE: GLW) and Murata (TSE: 6981) were advanced to jointly develop and ramp up ceramic separator manufacturing using the COBRA process, aiming to scale production capacity with world-class ceramics expertise. Customer billings metric initiated -- QuantumScape introduced customer billings as a key operational metric, with $12.8 million invoiced, including VW PowerCo under an upgraded arrangement. GAAP financial results -- Operating expenses totaled $115 million in Q3 2025, and net loss reached $105.8 million. Adjusted EBITDA loss -- Adjusted EBITDA loss was $61.4 million, in line with internal expectations. Capital expenditures -- Capital expenditures were $9.6 million, chiefly directed toward Eagle Line facility and equipment. Updated guidance -- Full-year guidance revised: adjusted EBITDA loss now projected at $245 million-$260 million, and CapEx at $30 million-$40 million, citing process efficiencies and changes in equipment timing. Liquidity and cash runway -- Net proceeds of $263.5 million were raised through the completed at-the-market program; quarter-end liquidity was $1 billion, and the cash runway was extended to the end of the decade (2029). Capital-light licensing model -- The company continues to advance a capital-light business strategy focused on development, licensing, and value sharing from partners, targeting near-term and long-term cash inflows. Automotive series production target -- PowerCo collaboration is targeting production of a series automotive vehicle using QuantumScape technology by 2029. Management confirmed that QuantumScape reached several key commercialization inflection points, including the live demonstration of QSC5 cells in the Ducati V21L and the fulfillment of major 2025 product delivery objectives. The company expanded its strategic partner network, notably advancing ecosystem relationships with both Corning and Murata to address scaling requirements for ceramic separator manufacturing. Financially, a shift to reporting customer billings highlights initial commercial traction, reflecting activity with Volkswagen PowerCo and underpinning a capital-light development and licensing framework. Management stated the liquidity position provides a cash runway through the end of the decade (i.e., through 2029), not 2030, supported by proceeds from recent capital markets activity. Sivaram said, "The next step in the Ducati program is field testing," establishing a near-term milestone for real-world product validation. Hettrich said, "We now project our cash runway extends through the end of the decade, a twelve-month extension from our previous guidance of into 2029," indicating enhanced financial visibility. Explicit accounting differences for customer billings and related-party transactions with Volkswagen PowerCo were described, impacting when inflows affect earnings and shareholders' equity. QuantumScape plans to cease providing ongoing cash runway updates and will instead report on customer billings as its preferred operational metric going forward. Industry glossary COBRA process: QuantumScape's proprietary method for scaling solid-state ceramic separator manufacturing to high-volume production. Customer billings: The aggregate value of invoices issued to customers and partners during a reporting period, distinct from US GAAP revenue recognition, used by QuantumScape to communicate commercial progress. Eagle Line: The company's highly automated pilot production line in San Jose, designed for increased volume manufacturing of next-generation battery cells. PowerCo: Volkswagen Group's battery subsidiary and QuantumScape's principal automotive partner for joint development and potential series production integration. Full Conference Call Transcript Siva Sivaram: I'd like to begin with one of the highlights of the year. On September 8, at IAA Mobility in Munich, Germany, we unveiled our launch program with the Volkswagen Group. The Ducati V21L race motorcycle, developed as a collaboration among Ducati, Audi, PowerCo, and QuantumScape Corporation. The Ducati V21L is a first-of-its-kind vehicle demonstration planned as a showcase for the exceptional performance of our no-compromise next-generation battery technology. As a launch program, the Ducati V21L is ideal. It is a low-volume but high-visibility demonstration that allows us to put the QSC5 technology into a demanding real-world application. The next step in the Ducati program is field testing. Turning to our annual goals, we are pleased to report that during Q3, we began shipping COBRA-based QSC5 B1 samples, completing another of our key annual goals for 2025. These cells are part of the Ducati launch program and were featured at the IAA Mobility conference. Our remaining operational goal for the year is to install higher-volume cell production equipment for our highly automated pilot line in San Jose, named the Eagle Line. Equipment for certain key assembly steps has already been installed on the Eagle Line, and this goal remains on track. Another important goal for 2025 has been to expand our commercial engagement, including deepening relationships with existing customers, engaging new customers, and bringing additional partners into our growing QuantumScape Corporation technology ecosystem. In Q3, we made substantial progress on all three fronts. With respect to existing customers, the successful launch event with Ducati, Audi, and PowerCo at IAA Mobility was a major milestone in our long collaboration with the Volkswagen Group. Last quarter, we also announced a new joint development agreement with an existing customer, and we are continuing to work closely with them as we progress through the first phase of development and commercialization engagement. We are also in active engagement with a new top 10 global automotive OEM in addition to our existing customers. With regard to QuantumScape Corporation ecosystem development, we continue to add world-class partners. On September 30, we announced an agreement with Corning to jointly develop ceramic separator manufacturing capabilities based on our COBRA process. Corning is a global leader in advanced materials, and they bring deep expertise in ceramics processing and proven manufacturing excellence to the QuantumScape Corporation ecosystem. In parallel, we successfully completed the initial phase of our collaboration with Murata Manufacturing, have signed a subsequent contract, and progressed to the next phase of that relationship. Our goal is to make QuantumScape Corporation technology the clear choice by providing our customers with a turnkey ecosystem to serve the global demand for better batteries. With Murata and Corning, we have two of the most world-renowned technical ceramics manufacturers as ecosystem partners, and we will continue to grow the ecosystem further. With our achievements this quarter, our vision for the commercialization of our next innovation in battery technology is beginning to take shape. We are executing consistently towards our key annual goals, demonstrating our technology, engaging with partners, and building out our capital-light development and licensing business model. Everything starts with execution, and we are proud of our team's performance. This year, we have already accomplished two of our key operational goals, baselining our COBRA process and beginning shipment of the COBRA-based QSC5 cells, continuing our track record of consistent execution against our goals. Q3 also saw our first technology demonstration with the Volkswagen Group, the Ducati V21L. We are expanding our collaboration with existing customers and adding new customers. We have also expanded our global ecosystem of world-class partners. The third quarter also marks another exciting milestone. We are beginning to show returns from our capital-light development and licensing business model, driving over $1 million in customer billings in Q3. Our ambitious targets naturally present many challenges to overcome, and there is much left to do. Our objective is clear: revolutionize energy storage, capitalize on our enormous market opportunity, and create exceptional value for our shareholders. With this aim in mind, we are excited to update shareholders on our continued progress over the months and years to come. With that, let me hand things over to Kevin for a word on our financial outlook. Thank you, Siva. Kevin Hettrich: GAAP operating expenses and GAAP net loss in Q3 were $115 million and $105.8 million, respectively. Kevin Hettrich: Adjusted EBITDA loss was $61.4 million in Q3, in line with expectations. A table reconciling GAAP net loss and adjusted EBITDA is available in the financial statement at the end of our shareholder letter. We continue to drive operational efficiency consistent with our capital-light licensing focus. We revised and improved our full-year guidance for adjusted EBITDA loss to $245 million to $260 million. Capital expenditures in the third quarter were $9.6 million. Q3 CapEx primarily supported facilities and equipment purchases for the Eagle Line. As a result of efficiency gains and process improvements, including from the COBRA process, as well as a change in timing of certain equipment ordering, we revised the range of our full-year guidance for CapEx to $30 million to $40 million. In Q3, we bolstered our balance sheet and completed our at-the-market equity program, raising $263.5 million of net proceeds in advance of the August 10 expiration of our shelf registration. We ended the quarter with $1 billion in liquidity. We now project our cash runway extends through the end of the decade, a twelve-month extension from our previous guidance of into 2029. Going forward, we plan to move away from providing updates on cash runway and will begin providing updates on customer billings. Customer billings represent the total value of all invoices issued by QuantumScape Corporation to our customers and partners in the period, regardless of accounting treatment. Customer billings is a key operational metric meant to give insight into customer activity and future cash inflows. The metric is not a substitute for revenue under US GAAP. Customer billings in Q3 were $12.8 million. In Q3, we invoiced VW PowerCo under the upgraded deal announced in July. The resulting cash inflows benefit QuantumScape Corporation shareholders. They will be directly reflected on the balance sheet as cash when we receive payment. During the collaboration phase of this particular deal, because of the related party relationship with VW, in accordance with US GAAP, a liability of equivalent value will also be created. QuantumScape Corporation has no repayment obligation with respect to these liabilities. Once relieved, rather than impacting the P&L, this value will accrue directly to shareholders' equity. Payments from other customers or partners, we expect, will be accounted for differently due to the lack of equity ownership or significant related party ties. Dan Conway: Thanks, Kevin. We'll begin today's Q&A portion with a few questions we've received from investors or that I believe investors would be interested in. Siva, the world's first lot demonstration of QuantumScape Corporation's solid lithium metal batteries in a Ducati V21L motorcycle premiered at IAA Mobility on September 9. Why is this such an important milestone? What are the next steps on your commercialization roadmap? Siva Sivaram: Dan, that announcement and seeing the bike ride across the stage was an emotional moment for all of us at QuantumScape Corporation. And it was obviously a huge milestone for all of our employees, investors, and partners. This is long in the making. Now we'll be demonstrating our battery in the field and gathering as much data as possible from field testing. Stepping back a bit, this was a major step in our strategic blueprint. You can think of this as four tracks that are running in parallel: the Ducati program, our PowerCo relationship, our other customers, and our ecosystem development. With respect to PowerCo more broadly, announced at IAA Mobility, we are working toward automotive-grade standards with the goal of a series production car with QuantumScape Corporation technology before the end of the decade. With respect to other customers, we are working towards commercialization deals with additional automotive OEMs. And, of course, we are building out our ecosystem with world-class partners like Murata and Corning. That we can handle a customer automotive customers at a turnkey supply chain. To serve the massive and growing demand for our technology. These are the main areas that we have to execute on. Thanks, Siva. Dan Conway: On that note, QuantumScape Corporation continues to advance discussions with key high-precision ceramic players, most recently announcing an agreement with Corning and advancing our partnership with Murata. How does this fit into the company's overall strategy of building out the QuantumScape Corporation global partner ecosystem? What are the key benefits of this business model and some potential ways you may receive economics from these partnerships? Siva Sivaram: Ben, QuantumScape Corporation's proprietary ceramic solid-state separator is our core IP. It enables our anode-free architecture and its performance advantage. Our strategy involves partnering with specialized high-precision ceramic manufacturers such as Murata and Corning to scale up separator production. These partners would supply QuantumScape Corporation separators to cell manufacturers like PowerCo, who would handle final cell assembly. This aggregated model allows QuantumScape Corporation to leverage the manufacturing expertise and balance sheets of partners with strong reputations in manufacturing as well as IP protection. Ceramic production is a highly specialized skill set, and this allows our cell production partners to focus on their core competency. It accelerates the scale-up of our technology by tapping into their manufacturing capabilities. In short, Corning and Murata are part of a complementary and expanding global ecosystem designed to de-risk scale-up and enable a capital-efficient path to commercialization. We believe each partner contributes unique strengths to help us efficiently scale our separator production into high volumes. As you would expect, we are continuing to build out the entire QuantumScape Corporation ecosystem with additional partners. Kevin Hettrich: And just to add on to that, in the fullness of time, the ecosystem would represent a third source of cash inflow under our capital-light development and licensing business model. The first is monetizing collaboration and customization work with our OEM partners. The second and largest source of inflows would be licensing as our customers produce cells using our technology. The third one would be value sharing from our ecosystem partners. Dan Conway: Thanks, Kevin. Can you expand further on customer billings as a key operational metric? How do customer billings translate into cash inflows? First, to expand on the significance of customer billings. Kevin Hettrich: Our first-ever invoices totaling $12.8 million in Q3 2025 are by themselves an important commercial milestone in the history of our company. It's nice to have arrived at the chapter where we're billing customers. I'd also highlight to investors that customer billings are evidence of our capital-light business model at work. On the front end, we monetize development activities for our customers to tailor our core technology to meet their specific needs. Subsequently, as the customer ramps production, we realize royalties over the lifetime of the project. Kevin Hettrich: As we continue to develop further generations of our technology, we'll seek to maintain these lines of business to generate consistent and compelling cash flows. Payment for development activities has the benefit of being near-term, while the royalty payments represent the majority of the value capture opportunity through a consistent long-term stream of high gross margin revenue. Value sharing from ecosystem partners represents further opportunity for shareholder returns. I'd also ask investors to keep four things in mind when interpreting our customer billings metric. First, the metric is not a substitute for revenue under US GAAP. Second, the accounting for individual customer billings may differ significantly. Third, the amounts billed to customers may vary from quarter to quarter due to fluctuations in activity as we progress through various phases of an agreed scope of work. Lastly, it is important to note that future cash inflows can diverge from customer billings, for example, as a result of timing differences, payment terms, prepaid customer deposits, or any adjustments to final payment amounts. Dan Conway: Okay. Thanks so much, Kevin. Now ready to begin the live portion of today's call. Operator, please open up the line for questions. Operator: Thank you. If you are called upon to ask your question and are listening via speakerphone on your device, please pick up your handset and ensure that your phone is not on mute when asking your question. To be able to take as many questions as possible, we ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Again, our first question comes from the line of Winnie Dong with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open. Winnie Dong: Hi. Thank you guys so much for hosting. First question is, I was hoping you can help me understand a bit more about the joint development of the ceramic separators with Corning, which you recently announced? If you can help me sort of understand maybe some similarities and differences in comparison to Murata. And then on Murata itself, you say you've successfully completed the initial phase of collaboration and then signed a subsequent contract. I was hoping if you can also help me better understand the nature of the agreement, perhaps some details of the economics or the technology know-how in terms of the transfer of it? That's my first question. Thank you. Siva Sivaram: Winnie, thank you. Thanks for the question. As you pointed out, this is an extremely important part of our business model to bring an ecosystem together for QuantumScape Corporation. Ceramic manufacturing is, as I mentioned earlier, an extremely specialized skill set. We want to bring people with us who can manufacture in high volume, taking our COBRA process and ramping it into the volume and using their balance sheet to put capital in building these factories up. When we started out with Murata about nine months ago, we both entered into a development agreement where they came in to evaluate what we needed to do, what they need to do, etcetera. They concluded that we entered into the next system where we start to ramp our relationship into a much higher level with commitments of volumes, etcetera. They understand what the volumes involved are, and our customers' needs are, etcetera. So we are getting to be in that phase. We can take COBRA and ramp in volume. We have been working with Corning throughout this time as well. Corning had also been under an early development contract with us, and then we came into a more detailed relationship as we announced in early September. The reason we need them is, as you would think, it's pretty obvious, the opportunity is so large that it is good for us to have two suppliers. Initially, they'll be complementary in different aspects of ceramic processing. I expect over the long term to have a much larger portion that each one of them does. Both of them are extraordinarily competent manufacturing partners, and they are excited to be part of this relationship. I spent time with both CEOs at length, and they are very, very eager to get launched into high-volume production and work with our big OEM partners. Winnie Dong: That's very helpful. Thank you. And then the second question is the new metric that you just introduced, the customer billing metric. I was wondering if you can give us maybe a rough idea on the conversion time to revenue or to the collection of those funds. And then is that sort of, like, the main metric you will be providing over time as opposed to sort of bringing out what revenue could look like in the next maybe one to two years or so? I just wanted to understand that dynamic a little bit better. And then I think last quarter, you mentioned there is some investigation being done in terms of, you know, revenue recognition. And I was hoping if you can also tie that into your response. Thank you. Kevin Hettrich: Hi, Winnie. So, just to outline back the question parts, there was a going to the definition of customer billings, talk about their importance, and also on the accounting treatment of VW PowerCo. So I'll take them in order. Just to be on the same page, we define customer billings as the total value of all invoices issued by QuantumScape Corporation to our customers and partners in the period, regardless of accounting treatment. Where we hope it's useful to investors is it's a key operational metric to get insight into customer activity and into future cash inflows. I think you also had a question about how those translate into the timing of cash flow payments. There, I did mention in my remarks that you could see a divergence from billings to future cash inflows for a variety of reasons. Could include things like timing differences in payment from customers, prepaid customer deposits, adjustments to final payment amounts, typical operational considerations there. You asked about the importance. First of all, it is very nice to be in this chapter where we're doing work of value to customers and billing them for it. That's a nice moment for our company. On the VW PowerCo treatment, the way that the accounting works is the cash inflows, of course, at a broader perspective benefit QuantumScape Corporation shareholders. They'll be reflected on the balance sheet as cash when we receive them. During the collaboration phase of the VW PowerCo deal, because of the related party relationship with VW, in accordance with US GAAP, a liability of equivalent value will also be created. A reminder to shareholders, we do not have a repayment obligation with respect to these liabilities. Upon relief of the liability, rather than impacting the P&L, this value will accrue directly to shareholders' equity. This accounting treatment is specific to the collaboration phase of VW PowerCo. Payments from other customers or partners we expect to be accounted for differently due to the lack of equity ownership or significant related party ties. Winnie Dong: Got it. That's very helpful. Thank you. I'll pass it on. Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Jed Dorsheimer with William Blair. Your line is open. Mark Shooter: Hi, everybody. Operator: You have Mark Shooter on for Jed Dorsheimer. Mark Shooter: Congrats on the stable progress and especially the Ducati demo. It's always a lot of learnings in actually creating the pack and integration. So, congrats on that. During that presentation, VW mentioned cells and EVs by the end of the decade. If we were to take this as 2029, does this track with your development timeline? So if we're assuming that these samples meet all the required cell specs, and a C sample stage gate is when you're producing those cells at scale. And four to five years seems a bit longer than we expected. So what do you think are the remaining technical boxes that need to be checked? And is there any opportunity to pull this forward with VW? Or potentially a little competition with the other two customer engagements you have ongoing? Siva Sivaram: Mark, thanks for the question. By the way, just to be technically correct, the end of the decade is 2029. So just to make sure we don't add an extra year into the calendar. The second thing is, look, actual prioritization belongs to the customer, and they announce plans the way they see it. Our job is to make sure we are going all out. We do everything that we can to make sure they are able to ramp as fast as they can. We are working hand in glove very closely with Volkswagen PowerCo. They know exactly the status of the industrialization because we are working closely with them. We will continue to do that. Now in parallel, when we go work with the new customers that we are talking about, both with an existing customer and the new customer, it's a completely independent path from what we are doing with Volkswagen. We don't try to go create competition for our customers, but we work very, very, very closely with each customer, adapting our technical roadmap to their product roadmap. So work goes on in real-time so that we can get to market as quickly as possible. As Kevin points out, in the meantime, they continue to pay us for the development activity that we do together. Mark Shooter: Appreciate the color. Thanks, Siva. 2029 it is. I didn't mean to assume 2030 there. Just it's not bad. I was that would be a separate track here. One engineering group to another before the end of the decade. December 30 worst 12/31/2029. Got it. Loud and clear. About the VW relationship as well, in the last iteration of this, there was some space left in for other potential applications where VW could source cells and sell to other markets potentially. Was this written in to give space to the Ducati program? Or should we be looking at even more adjacent markets? Is there any potential there? Siva Sivaram: Yeah. I actually do not want to, again, talk for the customer. But you are absolutely right. We are looking at non-Volkswagen Group applications as well into that contract. And the Ducati being part of the Volkswagen Group would be included in the regular production. We do expect to have partnerships across independent of the Volkswagen Group with other new customers and customers working with PowerCo that we both work together. Mark Shooter: Great. Thank you. Operator: And our next question comes from the line of Delaney with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Aman Gupta: Hey guys, you have Aman Gupta on for Mark. Thanks. Kevin Hettrich: Congrats on the progress. Maybe on the Aman Gupta: the other two customers that you mentioned in your prepared remarks, Siva, could you maybe help us get a sense of where the JDA stands with the customer you announced last quarter and what needs to happen to get that to a more complete commercial agreement? And similarly, on the top 10 global auto OEM, you mentioned you're in active engagement with what it would take to go from the active engagement to a licensing or a JDA agreement? Thanks. Siva Sivaram: Aman, thanks for the question. Of course, we are very excited about these two additional opportunities. We have been alluding to them over the last couple of quarters as to their maturation. We've been already in active engagement with them. As always, we let the OEMs do the announcement, and we follow them. You saw that at the IAA, we had Volkswagen come out and talk in detail about how they are taking the product into different applications that they have in mind. The same way, we will be doing that with these two as well. As much as I would love to talk about it ahead of time, it would not be appropriate for me to come and tell you how they are doing. But you will see over time as they start to talk about it more and more, you will get a clearer idea of who they are, what they are doing, and how they are doing. And I'm very excited about these prospects. Aman Gupta: Thank you for that color, everyone. Maybe secondly, on this partnership approach, recognizing the Corning and Murata relationships for the ceramic separator, I think you mentioned the possibility of expanding the ecosystem to other areas. For QuantumScape Corporation, can you give us a sense of what areas you might be looking to include for partnerships? And what the kind of structure of these partnerships looks like from maybe a financial standpoint as well? Thank you. Siva Sivaram: Yeah. I'll start with the partnership, and then Kevin will give you the financial impact of those. Look, we are developing a technology ground up that is very, very different in both its potential capabilities and scale-up from regular battery technologies. So wherever possible, we like to include competent and reliable partners from the ecosystem to be with us to invest capital. We talked about these two with respect to the ceramic separators. Have the high-touch transfer. When we develop this no-compromise solution, we want to be able to give them whether it is materials, whether it is equipment, whether it is processing, whether it is software, whether it is metrology. We want to wrap all of this together in a package that they can ramp. And in each of these, where we have original IP and where we have unique capabilities, we like partners to come along with us. We want to make it as easy as possible for our OEM customers to ramp production as quickly as possible. And so, you know, it would behoove us to bring these partners along. We continue to evaluate additional partners to join the team, and you can see the quality and caliber of the partners that we choose to work with us. Kevin Hettrich: On the finance side, as much as the cell is differentiated, their solid-state lithium metal technology, the energy density, the charge time, and the safety, we think that we're equally proud of the business model as well. We think that's good for shareholders. It's capital-light. It helps us focus on where we think we add value the most, which is in innovation and customer empowerment. It allows each member of our cell manufacturer customer ecosystem player to play to their strengths, which we think is in terms of time and effectiveness and risk-adjusted path to market. Best. And in terms of how our QuantumScape Corporation shareholders see value from that, it really comes from three ways. The differentiation of the self-performance creates value, and our shareholders capture it in three ways. The first would be the monetization of the collaboration work. You saw that in the quarter, $12.8 million of customer billings, longer-term licensing when our customers are producing cells from their factories, we'd get a licensing stream. And then finally, would be value sharing with our ecosystem partners. That together, we think, each of those is important in itself and also gives robustness to our approach. Aman Gupta: Thank you. Aman Gupta: Hassan. Operator: And as a reminder, it is. And with no further questions at this time, I will now turn the conference back over to QuantumScape Corporation management for closing remarks. Siva Sivaram: Thank you, operator. Finally, today, I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate the entire QuantumScape Corporation team on their outstanding performance this quarter, the execution that they have shown making this IAA announcement so powerful and well-received. And as always, thank you to our shareholders for their continued support. We look forward to updating you on further progress in the months to come. Thank you. Operator: And ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's call, and we thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.