Business

UK sugar tax to be extended to more soft drinks and milkshakes; markets rally ahead of the budget – as it happened

Government sets out plans to lower the threshold within the Soft Drinks Industry Levy to 4.5g per 100ml, down from 5g

UK sugar tax to be extended to more soft drinks and milkshakes; markets rally ahead of the budget – as it happened

4.40pm GMT Stock and bond markets rally ahead of the budget And finally, the City of London is ending Budget Day Eve in good heart. The stock markets have closed higher tonight, with the FTSE 100 share index ending the day 75 points higher, or +0.78%, at 9,609 points. Banks were among the risers, following reports that they will avoid a windfall tax in tomorrow’s budget. Kingfisher jumped 6% after the DIY chain lifted its profit guidance this morning. UK bonds have rallied today too, pushing down the yields (or interest rates) on British government debt. 10-year bond yields have dropped by 5 basis points (0.05 percentage points) to 4.495%, while 30-year yields are down 4bps at 5.32%. Reminder, our story about the sugar tax is here: Related: UK to extend sugar tax to cover bottled milkshakes and pre-packaged lattes 4.26pm GMT Chartered accountancy group ICAEW are concerned that extending the soft drinks industry levy (SDIL) to packaged milk-based drinks will introduces unnecessary complexity and only yield limited public health gain. ICAEW argues that lowering the sugar threshold from 5g to 4.5g targets just 11% of the market – many drinks affected will only need to remove a small amount of sugar to remain exempt Ed Saltmarsh, ICAEW technical manager, VAT and Customs, said: “The success of the original soft drinks industry levy was built on its simplicity and the clear incentive it created for reformulation. Introducing complex allowances for milk-based drinks risks undermining that simplicity. “Furthermore, we are concerned that shifting the goalposts to 4.5g chases diminishing returns and penalises the very businesses that previously reformulated, while leaving the highest-sugar drinks on the market untouched. “It also creates a confused tax landscape. If the government believes the health harms of sugar outweigh the nutritional benefits of milk, it raises questions about why other high-sugar categories, such as pure fruit juices and smoothies, remain entirely exempt despite often containing more sugar than the drinks being targeted by the threshold change.” 4.15pm GMT Mark Jones, partner and food & drink expert at law firm Gordons, highlights the long-term benefits (and potential downside) from the sugar tax: “The changes to the Soft Drinks Industry Levy, more commonly known as the ‘sugar tax’, come at a time 28 per cent of all children are overweight and 41 per cent of 10–11-year-olds are overweight, which doesn’t bode well for the future and the potential costs that will fall on the NHS from diet related diseases. Milk based drinks are currently exempt from the levy, which is odd given they are more likely to be consumed by children. “Expert reviews identify stronger measures on sugar as one of the most effective levers for improving diets nationwide and reducing calorie intake. The National Food Strategy by Henry Dimbleby was clear that an expanded sugar tax should form part of a holistic approach to reducing diet-related illness. “Recommendations from the innovation agency Nesta also reinforce that expanded taxation to encourage manufacturers to cut sugar is essential for long-term improvements in public health. “With a full food strategy due in 2026, it is important that the government’s final plans keep evidence-based sugar-reduction measures at their core, and the proposed amendment to the levy does that. “The downside to these types of policies is that you are picking your poison. The sugar tax led to lots of re-formulation to avoid the tax with artificial sweeteners being used as a substitute. We don’t know if artificial flavour enhancers/sweeteners have any downsides yet but given the, yet unproven, concerns around UPF, we may be trading one bad thing for another.” 3.24pm GMT Labour announces ‘tourist tax’ to support England’s cities Just in: the British government has announced it will hand new powers to local mayors in England to introduce a tourist tax. England’s mayors will be able to impose a new levy on overnight stays, to raise money to invest in transport, infrastructure, and the visitor economy, the government says. The government says the move would ensure UK mayors have the same powers as their counterparts in cities like New York, Paris and Milan to bring in charges on short-term visitors staying at hotels, holiday lets, bed and breakfasts, and guesthouses. Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government Steve Reed said: Tourists travel from near and far to visit England’s brilliant cities and regions. We’re giving our mayors powers to harness this and put more money into local priorities, so they can keep driving growth and investing in these communities for years to come. 3.13pm GMT Rachel Reeves is expected to announce a stamp duty holiday for companies listing on the London stock exchange, in an effort to revive the City. Bloomberg report that the exemption will mean investors won’t have to pay the tax when they buy shares in companies in the first three years after they list on the London Stock Exchange. Currently, stamp duty of 0.5% is levied on share purchases. The change could redress some businesses’ concerns about demand for UK shares, reckons Emma Wall, chief investment strategist at Hargreaves Lansdown: “The Chancellor is expected to announce a welcome boost for the UK stock market in tomorrow’s Budget – a stamp duty holiday for new listings on the London Stock Exchange. London has been losing out to New York in recent years, as businesses favour the funding and regulatory environment of the NYSE. But if this Budget rumour proves accurate, it may be the carrot British businesses need to plump for a domestic listing. Currently investors have to pay 0.5% stamp duty tax when they buy shares, but this is expected to be waived for new listings for up to three years – though this has not yet been confirmed. This would make buying British more enticing for investors and help redress some businesses’ concerns about demand for UK shares. If this goes ahead, it would help strengthen the Government’s stated position that they are both pro-business and supportive of a growing retail investment culture in the UK.” 3.12pm GMT There are also concerns that the new sugar levy will add to the burden on the UK’s retail and food & drink sector. Nick Garside, VAT partner at business advisory firm Menzies, said: “The milkshake tax is another blow to businesses already drowning in complex taxes and soaring fixed costs. “If this isn’t balanced with meaningful business rates reform for hospitality, leisure, and retail, it’s a clear net negative for growth. “While the levy targets only packaged drinks, not fresh cafe-made shakes, it still shakes up a struggling sector, and piles on administrative burden and cost at a time when margins are already diluted and consumer demand dwindles.” 2.43pm GMT Health charities are welcoming the extension of the sugar tax. Helen Kirrane, head of policy, campaigns & mobilisation at Diabetes UK said: “With cases of type 2 diabetes continuing to rise at an alarming rate, particularly in younger people, we need bold action to cut unnecessary sugar from food and drink. “The Soft Drinks Industry Levy has already substantially reduced the sugar in soft drinks, lowering the amount of sugar consumed by children. Expanding it to include milk-based and milk-alternative drinks, which can contain large amounts of hidden sugar, is a welcome step forward. “We know that, for many people, it can be overwhelming to navigate such a wide range of products, and it’s not always clear what is good for us. This change will help ensure the healthier choice is the easier choice.” Dr Charmaine Griffiths, chief executive of the British Heart Foundation (BHF), said: “The more sugar cut from drinks on supermarket shelves, the better, so extending the levy to include sugary milk-based drinks is the right thing to do. The current levy has been extremely effective at incentivising manufacturers to reduce sugar levels in soft drinks, and evidence has shown free sugar consumption in children and adults has decreased. “Diets high in sugar are linked to weight gain and obesity, which increase the risk cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure and type 2 diabetes. We hope this move motivates manufacturers to cut the amount of sugar in milk-based drinks and going forward, we need to keep up the pace of progress so families have far more healthy choices available to them.” Dr Ian Walker, executive director of policy at Cancer Research UK, said: “We welcome the UK Government taking stronger action on sugary drinks by extending the Soft Drinks Industry Levy to milk-based products and lowering the sugar threshold. These steps will help cut sugar consumption, support healthier choices, and ultimately reduce the risk of cancer – something Cancer Research UK has long called for. “Bold measures like this, alongside commitments on junk food advertising and healthy food standards, must now be delivered in full and enforced properly to create healthier environments for everyone.” 2.36pm GMT Reformulating drinks to cut down the amount of sugar will add to producers’ costs, points out Pinsent Masons partner Zoe Betts: “The government aims, with initiatives such as the sugar tax to help people make healthier choices, are to be applauded. However, industry cannot bear this burden alone. Addressing the obesity epidemic requires cross stakeholder collaboration, bringing in not just industry but health and education to ensure people are properly and fully equipped to make better choices. Reformulation results in significant cost to a business and can affect all in their supply chain, at a time they can least afford this. Whilst it may well result in a product with less sugar content, that does not always equate with being healthier. Care will be required to ensure that the resultant reformulation does not itself create a problem, simply fuelling obesity by another means.” 2.25pm GMT Dental surgeons: 'Milkshake tax' is a win for dental and public health Dr Charlotte Eckhardt, dean of the Faculty of Dental Surgery (FDS) at the Royal College of Surgeons of England, has welcomed the widening of the sugar tax – saying it will improve oral health. “After years of campaigning, we welcome the Government’s decision to extend the Soft Drinks Industry Levy to include milk-based drinks and lower the threshold from 5g to 4.5g of sugar per 100ml as a significant victory for public health. “Tooth decay remains the leading cause of hospital admissions among 5- to 9-year-olds in England, outpacing other illnesses such as acute tonsilitis. Extending the Levy represents a major step towards protecting children’s oral health. “FDS has consistently called for the threshold to be lowered to 4g of sugar per 100ml. While today’s announcement does not go as far as we recommend, we nevertheless welcome this change and remain hopeful that it will improve the dental and public health of the nation.” 1.50pm GMT Full story: UK to extend sugar tax to cover bottled milkshakes and pre-packaged lattes Here’s our news story on the sugar tax shake-up: Related: UK to extend sugar tax to cover bottled milkshakes and pre-packaged lattes 1.46pm GMT The changes to the sugar tax will kick in later than expected. The government had proposed implementing changes from 1 April 2027, in its consultation about the plan. Today, though, it says they will begin from 1 January 2028. This date was pushed back after the drinks industry pointed out it will face “reformulation challenges” to bring down sugar levels, and will also be busy implementing the UK’s new Deposit Return Scheme. 1.29pm GMT Widening the scope of the sugar tax should go a little way towards closing Rachel Reeves’s fiscal black hole. The levy will raise up to £100m a year from 2027, according to The Times. 1.14pm GMT Milk substitute drinks which contain added sugar are also being dragged into the Soft Drinks Industry Levy (the sugar tax). The health department says the government will remove the exemption for milk substitute drinks with added sugar. This will bring plant-based drinks with added sugar into scope of the Levy, if they contain 4.5g or more total sugars per 100ml. However, plant-based drinks which contain only sugars released from their principal, or ‘core,’ ingredient – such as soya, or oats - will be out of scope, the same as plain animal milks. 1.06pm GMT Drinks made and served in cafés, restaurants and bars won't be hit by levy The new sugar tax rules will apply to pre-packaged milk-based drinks with added sugar, such as bottled milkshakes and coffee drinks. ‘Open-cup’ milkshakes prepared in cafés, bars and restaurants will remain out of scope; as will plain cow’s milk, and other milk drinks without added sugar, the government says. 12.44pm GMT Drinks makers have been changing their recipes since the original sugar levy was rolled out, to avoid the tax pushing up their prices or eating into their profits. According to the government, there has been a 46% reduction in sugar in fizzy drinks within the scope of the levy since it came into force. This reduction has decreased the number of calories consumed from soft drinks and, according to modelling studies, may have prevented thousands of cases of childhood obesity while simultaneously cutting down on tooth decay. Cutting the threshold from 5g of total sugars per 100ml to 4.5g should bring more drinks within the levy’s scope. 12.37pm GMT Health secretary: We're fighting obesity with sugar tax changes Health Secretary Wes Streeting has pledged not to look away “as children get unhealthier”, as he confirms to MPs that milkshakes will be hit by the sugar tax. Speaking at health questions in the Commons, Streeting said: “Obesity robs children of the best possible start in life, hits the poorest hardest, sets them up for a lifetime of health problems and costs the NHS billions. “So, I can announce to the House, we’re expanding the soft drinks industry levy to include bottles and cartons of milkshakes, flavoured milk and milk substitute drinks. “We’re also reducing the threshold to 4.5 grams of sugar per 100 millilitres. This Government will not look away as children get unhealthier and our political opponents urge us to leave them behind.” 12.34pm GMT The decision to lower the threshold within the Soft Drinks Industry Levy to 4.5g per 100ml, down from 5g, means more beverages will be snared by the tax. The Financial Times reports that the change will catch drinks such as Pepsi, adding: Many well known brands such as Fanta and Irn-Bru sit at 4.5g and it is unclear if they will be caught by the tax 12.21pm GMT The public are generally quite pessimistic about the impact which tomorrow’s budget will have on their finances. A new survey from the Harris Poll UK has found that 61% of people expect the Budget to negatively affect their personal finances. Of these, 36% expect a small negative impact and 25% expect a significant negative impact. Only 26% expect a positive impact and 13% believe it will have no impact at all. Older generations are significantly more worried about the Budget’s impact. Concern rises steadily with age, reaching 88% among those aged 65+, compared with just 27% of 18–24-year-olds. This reflects “growing financial anxiety among older groups, who are often more exposed to rising living costs”, Harris says. 12.04pm GMT Milkshakes and lattes hit by Government sugar tax Britain will end the exemption for pre-packaged milkshakes and milky coffees from an existing tax on sugary drinks from January 2028, the health department has announced. The sugar tax, also known as the soft drink industry levy (SDIL), is a tax on pre-packaged drinks such as those sold in cans and cartons in supermarkets. It was introduced by the Conservative government in 2016 to help drive down obesity, particularly among children. The Health Department has announced that: the government will reduce the current lower threshold at which SDIL applies from 5g of total sugars per 100ml to 4.5g of total sugars per 100ml the government will remove the current exemption for milk-based drinks with added sugar. A ‘lactose allowance’ will be introduced to account for naturally occurring sugars in milk the government will remove the exemption for milk substitute drinks with added sugar. Milk substitute drinks without added sugar will remain outside the scope of SDIL. This includes plant-based drinks that only contain sugars derived from their principal or ‘core’ ingredient Updated at 12.17pm GMT 11.49am GMT UK bond yields dip ahead of the budget There’s a small recovery in UK borrowing costs today, as investors await tomorrow’s budget. The yield, or interest rates, on 10 and 30-year bonds have both dropped slightly, as prices have inched a little higher. Ten-year gilt yields are down 2.9 basis points to 4.515%, while 30-year yields are down 2.8bps at 5.337%. Matthew Amis, investment director for rates management at Aberdeen Investments, argues that chancellor Reeves could still positively surprise the gilt market on Wednesday - if she takes effective steps to bring inflation down. Amis explains: Having stepped back from income tax hikes, the market noise may yet be behind us – but Reeves has one trick left. The one rabbit out of the hat could be the extent of the inflation busting measures. If Chancellor Reeves can materially lower inflation, then this could spark the Bank of England’s imagination when it comes to rate cuts in 2026. This would see gilts perform well on Wednesday. If Reeves can lower the cost of living pressures we would assume this would be welcomed by the Labour backbenchers, and maybe the leadership discontent of recent weeks can reduce into year-end. Any perceived reduction in the simmering of tensions within the government would be welcomed by the long-end of the gilt market. The obvious risk to Reeves and the gilt market is that front-loaded costs to lowering inflation are paid for with a collage of backloaded tax hikes. Any material increase in gilt issuance in the coming years will not be well received.” 11.12am GMT UK retailers' confidence falls at fastest rate in 17 years before budget Sentiment amongst retailers has fallen at the sharpest rate in 17 years as budget fears mount, a new survey has found. The CBI’s latest quarterly Distributive Trades Survey, just released, has shown that sentiment among retailers worsened in November to the greatest extent in 17 years – a sign that budget speculation and uncertainty has hurt the economy. More firms expect their business situation to deteriorate over the coming quarter – this measure has weakened to -35% from -10% in August (meaning that the balance between optimistic and pessimistic companias has deteriorated). The Distributive Trades Survey, which polled 66 retailers and 95 wholesalers across the UK, also found that retail sales volumes fell at a fast pace in the year to November. November’s retail sales were judged to be “poor” to a somewhat greater extent than in October. In a worrying sign for Christmas spending, retailers expect demand to remain subdued heading into December, with sales set to fall again, albeit at a somewhat slower pace. Alpesh Paleja, deputy chief economist at the CBI, says: “Retailers continue to grapple with a long spell of weak demand, as households remain cautious around day-to-day spending. With all eyes on the forthcoming Budget, uncertainty in the run-up has meant that businesses are holding back on plans for investment and hiring. “The Chancellor must avoid pulling the business tax lever once again, at risk of further curtailing firms’ efforts to build a more resilient, dynamic economy. Businesses want bold decisions to wrestle back the government’s fiscal headroom and get the economy on a solid path to prosperity. This includes finding a landing zone for the Employment Rights Bill that doesn’t harm job prospects or shortchange economic growth.” 10.19am GMT Dan Coatsworth, head of markets at AJ Bell, cautions that UK banks aren’t definitely off the hook for tax rises tomorrow: “Reports that UK banks might get a reprieve in this week’s Budget from previously floated new tax measures helped give the likes of Lloyds, Barclays and NatWest a lift and underpinned the FTSE 100’s rise on Tuesday. “It suggests that some intense lobbying by the industry has paid off, although U-turns have been a theme in UK politics for some time so banking boardrooms may not breathe a full sigh of relief until Rachel Reeves has sat down tomorrow afternoon.” 10.10am GMT Analyst: pound could be in for a bumpy ride The pound is creeping higher today; it’s up a third of a cent at $1.3134 against the US dollar. Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB, reports that the foreign exchange (FX) market is “nervy” ahead of the UK budget: With taxes and spending on benefits and welfare payments expected to rise, the pound could come under pressure as the FX market questions whether this government can deliver growth. More FX traders are buying downside protection for the pound in the run up to this budget, and the 1-month GBP/USD risk reversal is trending lower. Thus, it could be a bumpy ride for the pound in the coming weeks. The pound is one of the weakest currencies in the G10 FX space since the start of Q4, and is lower by 2.8% vs. the USD and by nearly 1% vs. the EUR. These losses have slowed since the start of this month; however, this is not a sign that the market has warmed to sterling. Instead, the market could be waiting for another driver to send the pound lower, and an unconvincing budget both regarding growth and long-term fiscal consolidation, could tip GBP over the edge, sending it below $1.30 vs the US dollar. Updated at 10.10am GMT 10.04am GMT The “painful truth” is that sterling captures the confidence of international investors in the UK economy, writes Professor Costas Milas of the University of Liverpool’s Management School. Professor Milas tells us: Investors, of course, hate economic policy uncertainty. From a historical point of view (going back to 1965!) there is an inverse relationship between year-on-year growth (strength) of the sterling effective exchange rate and Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) in the UK, the latter proxied by economic policy uncertainty relative to its five-year moving average (the correlation coefficient is -0.43). I also note (sadly) that economic policy uncertainty in 2025 is higher than that of 2016 in relative historical terms... 10.00am GMT Over in Brussels, EU chiefs have pushed back at veiled threats by Howard Lutnick that Donald Trump’s punitive steel tariffs could only by lowered if the EU rolls back on regulation of US tech giants. Trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič told reporters the EU legislation was not aimed at the US but admitted commerce secretary Howard Lutnick and US trade representative needed more education on the matter. Šefčovič told reporters: “We explained how our legislation is working, it is not discriminatory and it is not aimed at American companies. We simply need to do more explanation in this regard. We’ll engage in that process.” He was speaking after the US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick demanded a “more balanced” approach before they would “handle the steel and aluminium issues”. Earlier Lutnick had met EU trade ministers after a rare invitation was extended for a lunch at a formal council gathering. His remarks were considered undiplomatic but one EU official shrugged: “They wouldn’t be American if they didn’t complain”. Another pointed out that the EU retains the “sovereign right” to legislate in its own territory without foreign interference. The official also pointed out that “steel and digital are completely unrelated” and the discussions on steel had been formally agreed by both sides in a joint statement in August. Lutnick also launched an undiplomatic attack on the EU, speaking directly to Fox News on the red carpet internal entrance to the summit of EU ministers. Incredulous at the EU’s green agenda, he claimed: “They rule out diesel gas and you gotta have batteries here by 2035. But Europe doesn’t make batteries! Only certain countries make batteries and Europe is not one of them. They gotta think better about themselves ... come on! Think correctly.” His social media post, viewed by more than 200,000, elicited a string of comments, pointing Europe has almost 40 battery production sites up and running or about to launch. Yesterday US trade representative Jamieson Greer also met tech commissioner Henna Virkkunen where they discussed “how to deepen the transatlantic cooperation on semiconductor supply”, a matter brought into sharp focus by the recent battle with China over Nexperia chip exports. In a separate meeting with defence commissioner Andrius Kubilius, the EU stressed the “big economic opportunities” for both sides in defence and space exploration. 9.30am GMT AO World criticises welfare spending rise The boss of electricals retailer AO World has called on the Chancellor to focus on cutting welfare spending rather than hitting businesses with more taxes, and claimed that reported plans to scrap the two-child benefit cap are “madness”. AO World chief executive John Roberts argues it would be a mistake wrong to increase welfare spending while the nation’s public finances need repairing. He urged Rachel Reeves to look at measures within the government’s own spending to plug the public finances black hole and not hit businesses with more taxes. Roberts – who was paid £1.392m last year - told the PA news agency: “Business is a force for good in the economy. “It gets demonised in this government and all it’s seen as is a source of more and more tax that they can then blow on the welfare budget.” Roberts told PA the Cabinet “couldn’t run a bath let alone a business”. And despite Rachel Reeves’s criticism of the misogyny and mansplaining she has faced, Roberts argued the Labour party needed to “man up” and “make some difficult decisions” in Wednesday’s Budget. 8.55am GMT Pound volatility soars as traders hedge against budget turbulence As flagged in the introduction, sterling volatility has indeed soared as traders brace for tomorrow’s budget. The cost of protection against swings in sterling has surged to a seven-month high this morning, as traders try to protect themselves against wild swings in the currency’s value. Bloomberg has the details: Overnight volatility versus the euro jumped to the highest since mid-April on an intraday basis, and is at the strongest closing level since June 2023 as traders load up against near-term price gyrations. Options now trade at the widest premium to realized swings in three years, signaling hedges are way overpriced relative to what the market has recently delivered. UK risk is being routed mostly through the euro, sidestepping the US macro influence on pound-dollar. Still, positioning has leaned pound-bearish this month versus both the common currency and the greenback, according to data from the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation. More here: Pound volatility soars as traders hedge for UK budget turbulence https://t.co/XnislpaHx6 via @vkaramanis_fx pic.twitter.com/L5l7HkAgjC— Zoe Schneeweiss (@ZSchneeweiss) November 25, 2025 Updated at 8.56am GMT 8.49am GMT Campaigners call for bank windfal tax Rachel Reeves was yesterday urged to impose a windfall tax on bank profits. Labour MPs Richard Burgon and Simon Opher joined campaign groups Positive Money and 38 Degrees as they delivered a petition to Downing Street, signed by over 68,000 people. The petition points out that the UK’s four biggest banks - HSBC, Barclays, NatWest and Lloyds - made record pre-tax profits of £45.9bn in 2024, and have already earned another £35.1bn in the first three quarters of this year. The campaigners say banks are enjoying windfall profits from higher interest rates – directly through higher mortgage rates and indirectly through the billions of pounds of interest that the Bank of England is paying banks on the risk-free reserve accounts they hold with it. Hannah Dewhirst, head of campaigns at Positive Money, says: “As households across the country prepare for a “difficult” Budget with little relief from the cost of living crisis, banks are reportedly going to escape contributing their fair share. Banks have made record profits at the public’s expense - allowing them to keep those unearned billions sends a terrible signal to ordinary people about where the government’s priorities lie. The Chancellor must resist the lobbying efforts of banks and claw back billions to repair our crumbling schools and hospitals with a windfall tax on their profits.” 8.27am GMT UK bank shares jump after 'avoiding budget tax raid' Shares in UK banks have jumped at the start of trading, following reports that they will be spared from a tax raid in the budget. NatWest (+3.3%), Barclays (+2.9%) and Lloyds Banking Group (+2.95%) are all among the top risers on the FTSE 100 share index in early trading this morning. The banks have been lobbying against higher taxes, arguing that this would lead to less lending and harm the economy. The effort appears to have been successful, the Financial Times reports this morning, citing people familiar with the planning for the Budget tomorrow. Back in August, the IPPR thinktank has argued that Rachel Reeves should levy a new bank tax to claw back money which the commercial banks receive from the Bank of England on money created during its quantitative easing stimulus programmes. Related: Treasury should tax big banks on quantitative easing windfalls, argues thinktank Intriguingly, the FT reports that the Treasury has asked banks to praise the budget, and highlight that new policies will boost lending to first-time buyers and small businesses. 8.14am GMT Kingfisher raises profit forecasts Shares in DIY chain Kingfisher have jumped by over 5% at the start of trading, after it raised its earnings forecasts. Kingfisher, which operates B&Q and Screwfix in the UK and Ireland, and DIY chains abroad including in France, Spain, Poland and Romania, has upgraded its full year adjusted profit before tax guidance to £540m-£570m, up from £480m-£540m previously. It raised its outlook despite “softening market conditions in the UK and Poland” in the last quarter, and cited progress in strategic initiatives and discipline on costs and profit margins. Thierry Garnier, chief executive officer at Kingfisher, said: “We delivered another quarter of high quality, volume-led growth, driven by our Group strategic initiatives in e-commerce and trade and by our performance in core and ‘big-ticket’ categories. B&Q, Screwfix and Iberia continue to strongly outperform their markets. Our performance to date and progress in our strategic initiatives give us the confidence to upgrade our full year profit guidance. As we look ahead, we are committed to driving shareholder returns through the consistent execution of our strategic priorities and by being disciplined on margin and costs.” 8.06am GMT Budget airline easyJet has beaten profit expectations, after raising its selling prices. EasyJet reported an 18% jump in pre-tax earnings in the last financial year, to £703m, ahead of forecasts of around £669m. Revenues at its holidays division increased by 27%, ahead of the 20% increase in customers due to an increase in average selling price of 5%. This means easyJet holidays hit its target of a pre-tax profit of £250m last year, earlier than expected; it now has a new, upgraded target of achieving £450m PBT by 2030. EasyJet has also raised its average selling price by “high single digits” in the first half of this financial year, and has sold 80% of capacity so far. Kenton Jarvis, easyJet’s CEO, says the company is on track to hits its medium-term goal of delivering over £1bn in profit before tax: “Since setting our medium-term targets in 2023 we have made significant progress, delivering a 46% improvement in profit before tax, adding 9% this year through the continued, successful execution of our strategy. easyJet holidays is today launching an even more ambitious goal having achieved its target early. “Our focus on investing in operations and enhancing customer experience, providing the warmest welcome in travel, has delivered improved punctuality, enhanced customer satisfaction and cost efficiencies this year. 7.49am GMT "How do you spell stagnation? G-E-R-M-A-N-Y." We have confirmation this morning that Germany’s economy failed to grow in the last quarter. German GDP was unchanged in the July-September period, statistics body Destatis has reported, which matche the initial estimate last month. Ruth Brand, president of the Federal Statistical Office, says: “Economic activity was hampered in the third quarter by weak exports, while investments increased slightly.” The lack of growth is a blow to chancellor Friedrich Merz’s efforts to stimulate the economy with a major spending programme. Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro at ING, fears that Germamy is in a state of “apparently never-ending paralysis”, with tariffs, the stronger exchange rate, and political tensions and uncertainty all hurting its economy. Brzeski told clients: How do you spell stagnation? G-E-R-M-A-N-Y. In the past three years, the German economy has recorded only two quarters of positive growth. On average, the economy has shrunk by 0.1% quarter-on-quarter in every single quarter since the fourth quarter of 2022. The just-released second estimate of German GDP in the third quarter of 2025 has confirmed this sad record of yet another stagnating quarter. On the year, the economy grew by a meagre 0.3%. 7.49am GMT Introduction: Sterling volatility expected around the budget Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy. The pound is in the spotlight as investors brace for tomorrow’s budget, fearful of a negative market reaction to Rachel Reeves’s plans. The pound has weakened over the last few months, down from $1.36 in mid-September to $1.31 today, having hit a seven-month around $1.30 at the start of this month. Traders are anxious as to whether the chancellor will manage to rebuild, or even increase, her headroom to hit the government’s fiscal targets in coming years. Matthew Ryan, head of market strategy at financial services firm Ebury, predicts the pound will be volatile this week: “It’s unclear if there will be enough room to raise taxes sufficiently to reach the required £25-30 billion shortfall, with the government reportedly ruling out hiking income tax rates and seemingly unable to cut fiscal expenditure. “We instead see a sort of patchwork of assorted and targeted tax increases, but the devil will be in the details, and if Reeves is unable to convince markets that she has a credible long-term plan for fiscal sustainability, then the pound could struggle on Wednesday. At any rate, brace for volatility in sterling this week.” According to the Financial Times this morning, traders have been “piling into bets” that the budget will push the pound lower against the dollar, They report that trading volumes in put options, used to speculate on or hedge against a fall in the pound, have outstripped those of bullish call options by more than four to one over the past week, according to derivatives firm CME Group. News yesterday that the UK’s growth forecasts will be downgraded has further dampened the mood: Related: Reeves expected to reveal cut in growth forecasts for next five years in budget The flurry of reports of potential budget measures over recent weeks – with an income tax rise first on, then off, the agenda – hasn’t reassured the markets. Thomas Pugh, chief economist at audit, tax and consulting firm RSM UK, says this “chaos” is costly: “The flip-flopping, U-turning and general chaos of the last couple of months means we are much less certain of what to expect in this week’s budget than usual. “This raises three issues. First, chaos has a cost. The recent economic data make it clear that worries about the Budget is dragging on growth. Second, uncertainty raises the chances of an adverse reaction in gilt markets on the day if the budget disappoints. Third, the chances of additional rate cuts next year are falling quickly because it looks like the budget will be less deflationary and more backloaded. A tax-heavy budget is likely to weigh on growth, increasing the possibility that the Bank of England cuts interest rates in December and again in 2026. Ipek Ozkardeskaya, senior analyst at Swissquote, says tomorrow’s budget is “make-or-break’ for sterling, because… ..either the Bank of England steps in to prevent a gilt flare-up if investors dislike what they hear, or to cushion the economy if tax hikes bite hard. The agenda 11am GMT: CBI distributive trades report on UK retail 1.30pm GMT: US retail sales report 2pm GMT: Case-Shiller US house price index 3pm GMT: Pending US home sales report 3pm GMT: US consumer confidence report

Related Articles