Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Articles by Gazi Abbas Shahid

3 articles found

BIG setback for Pakistan economy as major companies exit country due to…; top names include Microsoft, Shell, Telenor, benefit for India because…
Technology

BIG setback for Pakistan economy as major companies exit country due to…; top names include Microsoft, Shell, Telenor, benefit for India because…

Pakistan economy: Top multinational corporations including big names like Microsoft Shell TotalEnergies Telenor and Pfizer have shut their operations in Pakistan during recent years dealing a severe blow to the countrys already struggling economy. According to a recent report major global businesses have exited Pakistan over the past few years at a time when top MNCs are expanding operations in India. What caused exodus of foreign companies from Pakistan? As per a report in Japanese daily Sankei Shimbun global firms are steadily withdrawing from Pakistan due to a multitude of factors including the countrys failing economy business culture regulatory environment and institutional stability. The steady exodus of foreign companies from Pakistan showcases low investor confidence in the country due to lack of long-term policies and transparent regulations the report stated. According to Professor Pema Gyalpo a visting professor at the Takushoku University and an Emeritus Professor of Gifu Womens University Pakistan economy in a state of disrepair and is now unable to attract global investors as they are apprehensive about Islamabads economic prospects primarily due to the nature of governance or lack thereof in the South Asian country. Which companies have exited Pakistan? Among the companies which have winded up operations in Pakistan due to the above mentioned factors top names like Microsoft Shell TotalEnergies Telenor and Pfizer stand out a clear sign that even major firms are unwilling to risk investing in the country. In 2024 Pfizer ended its local production in Pakistan selling its Karachi manufacturing plant to Lucky Core Industries while British oil and gas giant Shell pulled out a year earlier after selling it stake to Saudi Arabias Wafi Energy in 2023. Similarly energy major TotalEnergies sold its stake Singapore-based Gunvor Group while Telenor has worked out a deal to sell its Pakistan operations to Pakistan Telecommunications Company Limited though the process is stalled due to delays in regulatory approvals. Earlier this year in July Microsoft quietly shuttered its operations in Pakistan while Procter & Gamble recently announced the closure of its manufacturing and commercial operations in the country. Why foreign firms exodus reflects Pakistans systemic crisis? According to industry experts the mass exodus of foreign firm from every sector ranging from consumer goods to energy pharmaceuticals telecom and tech is a reflection of deepening systemic crisis in Pakistan and shows how Islamabads problems arent limited to a single sector. Experts point out issues like high electricity costs frequent power cuts weak infrastructure and administrative delays that have further added to the woes of Pakistans dilapidated business environment prompting companies to shut operations due to low profit margins and lack of trust in the system. This isnt just an economic decision for foreign companies but also reflects a lack of trust in the system. Frequent policy changes and delays in government approvals have left companies frustrated says Saad Amanullah Khan former CEO of Gillette Pakistan. How Pakistans decline benefits India? Meanwhile as corporations are withdrawing from Pakistan India is rapidly emerging as a global investment hub due to various factors such as strong economic growth a growing middle class digital infrastructure and easy policies for investors. According to official figures India attracted a whopping $81 billion in foreign investment in the 2024-25 fiscal year as global firms continued expansion of their operation in the country. Experts believe Indias regulatory framework and political stability have fostered a trustworthy environment for global investors resulting in giants like Apple Amazon and Google to rapidly expand their operations in the country while major firms are exiting Pakistan.

Tata Trusts power struggle: Ratan Tata biographer makes BIG statement, says a Tata must always…
Technology

Tata Trusts power struggle: Ratan Tata biographer makes BIG statement, says a Tata must always…

Tata Trusts power struggle: Amid the ongoing power tussle unfolding within Tata Trusts Thomas Mathew who penned the biography of the late Ratan Tata has asserted that the trusts must always be led by a member of the Tata family in order to perpetuate the goals envisioned by its founders and leaders. Why a Tata must always head Tata Trusts? Asked about the ongoing power squabble within Tata Trusts Mathew termed the infighting a small difference of opinion asserting that these are mere side-shows which will not have any impact on a gigantic entity like the Tata Group conglomerate. A small bit of difference of opinion etc will happen during every transition but the house of Tatas is so big and strong that these are side shows. Responding to a query about how he views he legacy of late Ratan Tata and the Tata family moving forward on the late Tata Groups chairmans first death anniversary the biographer asserted that a Tata must always head Tata Trusts-- the majority shareholder of Tata Sons-- the holding company of the Tata Group. Tata Trusts according to me should always have a Tata at its head. Theres no doubt regarding it because it is a trust of the Tatas meant to perpetuate the goals which these great personalities had envisioned the author told news agency PTI. What Mathew said about Tata Trusts power tussle? When pointed out that the matter has reached the government with the top brass of Tata Trusts and Tata Sons meeting Home Minister Amit Shah and Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman earlier this week Mathew said That is all right but nothing is going to happen to the group. Mathew admitted that these small differences shouldnt have been public but I think itll get resolved without much of a problem. On whether the current crop of Tata Group leaders have been able carry forward the legacy of Ratan Tata Mathew hailed Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran stating that he is completely devoted to Tata Groups core ideals especially what Mr Ratan Tata stood for. Mathew who contrasted the response of the Tata Group to the Air India crash in Ahmedabad in June this year with the 26/11 terrorist attack in Mumbai that also hit Taj Hotel during which late Ratan Tata stood outside the hotel for three days and led the team tasked to give relief to those affected said You cannot expect everybody to be like RNT (Ratan Tata). Tata Trusts infighting Meanwhile on Tuesday the top brass of the Tata group Tata Trusts Chairman Noel Tata Tata Sons Chairman N Chandrasekaran Tata Trusts Vice Chairman Venu Srinivasan and trustee Darius Khambata met Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman amid infighting among trustees over board appointments and governance issues. The power tussle among the trustees of Tata Trusts threatens to impact the functioning of the over $180 billion conglomerate. Tata Trusts exerts decisive influence over Indias most valuable conglomerate through its about 66 per cent stake in Tata Sons the promoter and holding company of the salt-to-semiconductor group. (With PTI inputs)