Monday, October 27, 2025

News from October 26, 2025

1536 articles found

Danny Rohl repeats his Rangers mantra and sends 'small step' message to relieved hitman
Technology

Danny Rohl repeats his Rangers mantra and sends 'small step' message to relieved hitman

Rangers head coach Danny Rohl has urged his side to use their 3-1 Scottish Premiership win over Kilmarnock as a springboard heading into two mammoth games against Hibs and Celtic next week. Goals from Derek Cornelius, Danilo, and Youssef Chermiti gave the German head coach a win in his first league game in charge at Ibrox, ending the club’s search for a first home league victory in 165 days in the process. Rangers now sit in fifth ahead of their trip to Easter Road to face Hibs on Wednesday night, and with a Premier Sports Cup semi-final against rivals Celtic on the horizon next weekend, Rohl has repeated his insistence that only a run of consecutive victories will rescue their season. “I said before the game to my players that this is the good thing in football: it's a short memory,” said Rohl. “Every win goes very straight in one direction, and I think this is what you have to understand. If you are ill, you cannot change it so quickly sometimes, you have to work on this, but in football, with one win, with one week, you can turn a lot of things in the right direction. I think this should be our mindset, step by step. Today was a first step, and on Wednesday, we have to take the next step. “I must say I really enjoyed our performance. It was not perfect, but it was a good step forward. A first win is always important for the group to create confidence. Today I saw many more good things. We looked back on Thursday, and it was a big disappointment, not just from the tactical part, but how we played with intensity. Today it was much better. It is a small step in our journey; we know where we want to go.” Serenaded by the home support both before and after the final whistle, Rohl thanked Rangers fans for his the welcome, but remained focused on his team’s performance as he opened up on the importance of Chermiti’s first goal for the club following his £8.5million move from Everton in the summer. “As I said to my players after the game, they should also really enjoy this moment today,” said Rohl. “The last weeks and months have not always been easy, but this is our goal: we want to win games, we want to play attractive football, and we want to do it together with our fans. If you bring everyone closer and closer, and we are really strong together, then I think we can really be successful in the future here. Today was a small step, not more, because the journey is still long. “I think generally, I must say it was a good outcome from the team. We put Danilo on from the start, and he scored, after not playing so much in the past. After 70 minutes, it was clear we wanted to bring the next striker on. This was for him [Chermiti] as well a good step, a small step, not more. I think this is also important: we saw today what is possible, he still has to improve some things, but for me it's important to improve the self-confidence of the players. “I think there were a lot more players with confidence, and from minute to minute you saw players who wanted to have the ball, there were also some good moments where players started to work against the ball, not just think ‘I want to have nice football’. If you do this, then you feel really you are in the game, and this is what I liked.” Sign up to The Scotsman’s daily football newsletter to get unrivalled Scottish football news and analysis - subscribe for free here.

Trump has a 'Sputnik moment' but China is wiping the floor with America
Technology

Trump has a 'Sputnik moment' but China is wiping the floor with America

The other day US President Donald Trump said: "With a communist in charge? Look, you just go back a thousand years, it's been done many times, a thousand years, it's never worked once." He was talking about Zohran Mamdani, the leading candidate for New York City's mayoral election on November 4, who says he is a democratic socialist, not a communist. Close enough. As for the thousand years, he must be talking about King Cnut the Dane who was ruling England in 1025, and who does seem to have been a bit of a Kim Jong-il-style communist, having inherited the Danish crown from his father before invading England, and commanded the tides not to rise and all that, although 1,000 years ago Karl Marx was 823 years away from inventing communism. Anyway, Trump had forgotten that the previous day he had signed a critical minerals deal with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to try to counter China's dominance of their global supply. China's capitalism 101 controls rare earths To remind the president: China is both communist and working passably well, something he and the United States generally are being forced reluctantly to confront. In fact, China is doing better than just working. Historian Adam Tooze pronounced on a podcast about the same time as Trump and Albanese were signing their deal that: "China isn't just an analytical problem; it is the master key to understanding modernity. [It] is the biggest laboratory of organised modernisation there has ever been or ever will be …" But then, is China actually communist? Well, it's ruled by the Communist Party and has been for 76 years, still with an official ideology of Marxism-Leninism "with Chinese characteristics", which seems to mean that it's a capitalist sort of communist country. Indeed, China used capitalism 101 to get control of rare earths and critical minerals: that is the time-honoured tactic of loss leading, in which a business sells a product below cost to drive its competitors out of business and grab a monopoly. The world's principal rare-earths mine, Mountain Pass in California, was driven out of business by China in 2002, and while it reopened in 2015 with a price guarantee from the Obama administration, it was too late — its 70 per cent global market share had become China's 70 per cent, which it still is. In 2002, the US was busy invading Afghanistan and getting ready to invade Iraq and if America's leaders at the time thought about China at all, they thought that it would never amount to much … because, you know, they are communist losers. At that point America was still basking in the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union, and Francis Fukuyama's 1992 book, The End of History and the Last Man, which argued that the end of the Cold War marked the end of mankind's ideological evolution and the final victory of Western liberal democracy as the enduring form of human government. Communism doesn't work was the general view, to which Trump apparently still cleaves. Also, in 2002 China had just joined the World Trade Organization and embarked on the modernisation that Tooze describes as the biggest there has ever been or ever will be. And now China is wiping the floor with America in just about every aspect of economic and industrial life. Trump missing a 'Sputnik moment' The 2002 closure of the Mountain Pass mine should have been a "Sputnik moment" for the United States, echoing the Soviet Union's launch on October 4, 1957, of the first satellite, Sputnik 1, which produced a huge, panicked national effort to invest in science and scientific education, leading to the creation of NASA, landing Apollo 11 on the Moon in 1969 and, eventually, to the invention of the internet and artificial intelligence (AI). There was a bit of a Sputnik moment on February 4 this year when China's Ministry of Commerce announced new controls on exports of tungsten, tellurium, bismuth, molybdenum and indium. China supplies 80 per cent of the world's tungsten and bismuth, 67 per cent of tellurium and indium and 42 per cent of molybdenum. By the way, this was seven years after China's own Sputnik moment, when the US banned semiconductor exports to China and set China on a new and very focused economic course. The logic for Beijing was simple: if the US could ban shipments of semiconductors, it might also ban chemical products, auto parts, or any number of key inputs. Becoming self-sufficient in everything became a matter of national security. Chinese banks were told to stop lending to real estate and instead to lend hand over fist to anyone adding industrial capacity (note that the government didn't build the capacity itself, as a truly communist nation would — it was socialism with Chinese characteristics). On March 20, Trump issued an executive order with "Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production", which was a long way short of what Dwight D Eisenhower did in 1957 in response to Sputnik 1. On April 4, Beijing doubled down, adding export-licence requirements on seven rare earths — samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and yttrium — and made it clear these minerals would not be available for military applications. That galvanised the Trump administration into action and negotiations for a deal to get hold of Australian rare earths were urgently commenced. But there should have been some more Sputnik moments for the US this year, starting with the Chinese AI company, DeepSeek, unveiling its models on January 22 this year, at a fraction of the cost of American ones. Everyone thought China was running a distant second in the AI race, but that turned out to be wrong. Chinese robots at the shops Then more recently, Chinese mega tech company Alibaba announced it had developed a pooling system called Aegaeon that reduced by 82 per cent the number of Nvidia GPUs (graphics processing units) needed to do AI. And in the past few days here in Australia, there has been a small burst of publicity about robots in shopping centres prompted by a company called Bellbots, including an appearance on Kyle and Jackie O, and a story on Channel 9 news filmed with a robot at the new Silverdale mall in Penrith. I rang up Andrew Bell, 36, founder, owner and CEO of Bellbots. At 17 he joined the army and a year later was sent to Iraq where, he says, he was exposed to a lot of tech (as well as bullets presumably). His business idea is to put robots into shopping centres where he would rent a space to park and charge their batteries, and then have the machines wander around the centre (they are 1.5 metres tall, walk on two legs, talk, look a bit human, with a head but not a face, and are remarkably stable). There will be two revenue streams as Bell sees it: advertising, with the robot voicing ads paid for by retailers to spruik their stores, and shoppers could also use an app to rent the robot to carry their shopping to the car (or discuss the meaning of life over a coffee?). At least that's the plan. And where is he getting the robots from? China, and a company called Unitree. Unitree launched its new generation of humanoid robots last week, called H2, with a video of it dancing to loud heavy metal music. Rudolph Nureyev it is not, but that the thing dances at all is progress. Bell has bought one of Unitree's G1 machines, not the all-dancing H2 model, and has another nine on standby if he can get a deal with a shopping centre. He wouldn't tell me what he paid for it, but I'd guess it's about $20,000. My son's reaction was: "Oh, these things are going to end up in the river!", which is probably true after what happened to e-bikes, so there's an insurance dimension to be worked out. Bell says he would have liked to use Tesla's Optimus robot, which he loves the look of, but when he contacted them, they weren't interested and blew him off. Unitree in China, on the other hand, was all over him: "They were open to anything we wanted to suggest, really on the ball." If Chinese robots wandering around a shopping centre in Penrith spouting ads and carrying shopping to the car park isn't a Sputnik moment, and proof that communism works, I don't know what is. Alan Kohler is finance presenter and columnist on ABC News and he also writes for Intelligent Investor.

Oliver Glasner singles out Arsenal star for special praise – but refuses to answer Eberechi Eze question
Technology

Oliver Glasner singles out Arsenal star for special praise – but refuses to answer Eberechi Eze question

Arsenal consigned Crystal Palace to their second defeat of the Premier League season (Picture: Getty) Oliver Glasner reserved special praise for Declan Rice after Crystal Palace’s 1-0 defeat to Arsenal, applauding the midfielder’s efforts in shutting down Ismaila Sarr. Eberechi Eze arrowed home the only goal of the game against his former club to help Arsenal tighten their grip on top spot in the Premier League table. Gabriel Magalhaes and Bukayo Saka both had opportunities to double the hosts’ lead after the break, but Eze’s stunning 39th-minute strike ultimately proved the difference in north London. The win was Arsenal’s seventh on the spin in all competitions and Mikel Arteta’s men will be looking to pick up where they left off when they return to top-flight action away to Burnley next Saturday. Manchester City, Liverpool and Chelsea all slumped to defeats on a massively productive weekend for the Gunners, who sit four points clear at the summit after nine games. ‘I haven’t seen many teams creating a lot of chances here,’ Glasner told reporters after his Palace side were consigned to only their second loss of the campaign. ‘We had a few moments where we could have been more dangerous and we missed a few opportunities to create more chances because it took us too long. Eze’s stunning first-half strike proved to be the winner (Picture: Getty) The Gunners hold a four-point advantage at the top of the table (Picture: Getty) ‘On the other side, it was a credit to Arsenal, how quickly they recovered. ‘We saw just in the second half that there were two or three times we found Ismaila Sarr in the pocket and then Declan Rice recovered and stole the ball, instead of making an overload, because he made pressure. ‘It just took us too long and that’s why we couldn’t create more.’ Glasner was impressed by Rice’s performance (Picture: Getty) Glasner felt Palace were ‘punished’ for making two big ‘mistakes’ in the build-up to Eze’s thumping strike shortly before half-time. ‘We didn’t give them a lot but a little bit too much,’ the Palace head coach added. ‘In one situation [the goal] we made two mistakes and we got punished. That’s why we lost in the end. ‘Two mistakes in one situation is too much when you play here at the Emirates against Arsenal, who are in fantastic shape.’ City, Liverpool and Chelsea all lost on a productive weekend for Arsenal (Picture: Getty) According to Glasner, Rice has taken Arsenal to ‘the next step’ since joining from West Ham – and the England international is just another example of the club’s exemplary recruitment in recent years. Asked what exactly makes Arsenal so difficult to break down, the Austrian replied: ‘Everything! ‘They were second in the league three times in a row, investing £300million, having fantastic players, having a great manager, having a clear structure. Glasner cut a frustrated figure on the touchline in north London (Picture: Getty) ‘You can they play on the top level of the world and this is what they are showing: consistency, always analysing what kind of players to add to the squad to make the next level. ‘And that’s over years, not just this summer. They saw Declan Rice two or three years ago and they bought him for £120m from West Ham… always exactly knowing what kind of players they need to make the next step and then integrating them into their structure. ‘Defensively, they are compact and always relying on their structure on set-pieces, having a fantastic balance in the game, so I think all of this and developing over many years now, doing many things right… then you are challenging for the Premier League title.’ While Glasner was glowing with his assessment of Rice’s display, he refused to give his thoughts on Eze’s showing – two months on from the attacker’s departure at Selhurst Park. Asked to rate Eze’s performance, an unimpressed Glasner replied: ‘I don’t talk about players from other teams. ‘Yes, he scored the game-winner like he did for us in the FA Cup final. At that time I was pleased. ‘Today it’s the opposite. What’s the opposite of being pleased? I’m sad.’ For more stories like this, check our sport page. Follow Metro Sport for the latest news on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Sinner Fights Back Against Zverev To Claim 'Special' Vienna Crown
Technology

Sinner Fights Back Against Zverev To Claim 'Special' Vienna Crown

Jannik Sinner clinched his fourth title of the season on Sunday as the Italian rallied from a set down to beat Alexander Zverev in the final of the Vienna Open. Sinner dropped his first set of the tournament before staging a comeback to see off Zverev 3-6, 6-3, 7-5 to land the 22nd title of his career. It is his second triumph in Vienna, where he also lifted the trophy in 2023, and extended his winning run on indoor hard courts to 21 matches going into next week's final Masters 1000 of the year in Paris. But the top seed had to do it the hard way after falling behind as world number three Zverev, who had won four of seven previous meetings, secured the only break of the first set to take the upper hand. "It was such a difficult start in this final for me," said Sinner. "I went a break down, had some chances in the first set but couldn't use them. He was serving very well, but I just tried to stick there mentally and play my best tennis when it came." Sinner replied though by racing 3-0 ahead in the second set as he forced a decider against the 2021 champion. Zverev saved two break points in the fifth game of the third set but Sinner maintained the pressure despite battling a thigh issue in his first event since retiring with cramp at the Shanghai Masters. Sinner created another opportunity at 5-all with a blistering backhand down the line and won a lengthy rally the following point to snatch the key break. A routine hold wrapped up victory for the 24-year-old who has reached the final in eight of his 10 tournaments this season, with Sinner adding to his titles at the Australian Open, Wimbledon and Beijing. "The third set was a bit of a rollercoaster, but I was feeling the ball very well at times, so I tried to push and I'm very happy of course to win another title," Sinner added. "It's very special."(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Bessent: 100% Tariff Trump Threatened on China 'Effectively Off the Table'
Despite Cowboys Offense Being ‘Unstoppable’, Analysts Predict Dak Prescott to Extend His Losing Streak vs. Broncos
Technology

Despite Cowboys Offense Being ‘Unstoppable’, Analysts Predict Dak Prescott to Extend His Losing Streak vs. Broncos

The Dallas Cowboys’ offense, led by Dak Prescott, has been nothing short of outstanding this season. They rank second in points per game, first in total yards, and sit comfortably in the top ten for red zone scoring. However, their struggling defense has been a major setback, making it tough for the team to consistently stack up wins. Dak and the Cowboys did light it up last week with a dominant 44-22 home victory over the Washington Commanders. But this week’s road game presents a whole new challenge. So far, the Cowboys are 0-3 away from home, and they’re set to face a Denver Broncos team riding high after one of the most thrilling comeback wins of the decade (against the Giants). It’s no wonder NBC analyst Chris Simms went with the hype and picked the home team to come out on top. “Denver is really good, and they’ll make some plays,” Simms began, adding, “I’m just going to go with the Broncos and that they find enough plays in this football game. I’m going to go 27-24, Broncos.” Simms did, however, rave about Dallas’ offense under Dak. “I don’t think anybody can really stop the Cowboys’ offense,” the analyst said via ProFootballTalk. “I don’t think that’s really possible. I think you’ve done a good job when you just keep them around 24 or 27. That’s how good they are.” Simms went on to talk about how the Cowboys can still run the ball despite being down two offensive linemen. He also added that the combination of CeeDee Lamb and George Pickens is a formidable one to go up against, wrapping together a strong argument for why Dallas needs to be respected. Mike Florio, too, gave his prediction for the game during the show. “I put down last night of 24-20, Broncos. It’s like, should it be 34-30?” Florio questioned, adding, “I think the Broncos defense will put the clamps on the Cowboys and do just enough to outscore them.” A loss tonight would mean a third straight defeat for Dak against the Broncos in his career. It would also extend the Cowboys’ losing streak to eight straight games against Denver, a run dating back to the 1990s. Dak has also never beaten the Buffalo Bills in the two times he’s played them in his career. They’re the only two teams he has never won against. Surely, he wants to cross one of those off the list today, but the odds aren’t in his favor. We’ll see if Simms and Florio’s predictions come true. The Broncos have been quite a mercurial team so far. One week, they look like world-beaters, the next not so much. It makes for a wide range of potential outcomes in this game, in what could be the most exciting watch of the week.

'These monsters are thriving': Paedophiles have infiltrated childcare centres
Technology

'These monsters are thriving': Paedophiles have infiltrated childcare centres

Paedophiles have infiltrated Australia's $22 billion childcare industry by exploiting lax regulation, piecemeal oversight and glaring staffing inadequacies, a major Four Corners investigation has uncovered. The full scale of this crisis has been hidden — until now. We have identified almost 150 childcare workers convicted, charged, or accused of sexual abuse and inappropriate conduct. Half of the 42 people convicted were sentenced in the last five years alone and another 14 are currently before the courts. The public records we have pieced together show the rate of offending in childcare is increasing — exposing a system that has allowed predators to thrive. With barely 15 per cent of reports of child sexual abuse leading to charges and only 2 per cent leading to a conviction, experts say the real number of predators who have worked in childcare over the years is likely in the thousands. Drawing on more than 200,000 pages of previously confidential documents, police tip-offs, court records and evidence from parents, educators, whistleblowers and experts, the investigation exposes a system so broken it has created a perfect storm for abuse. "The psychology of these people is to seek out opportunity, and childcare centres represent an excellent opportunity for them," said Drew Viney, the former head of AFP's National Victim Identification Unit, who helped catch one of the country's most prolific paedophiles, childcare worker Ashley Griffith. "The safeguards aren't there … there's failures at multiple levels from what I've witnessed firsthand." "These monsters are thriving in these spaces because it's so easy for them," said the mother of a child who was repeatedly sexually abused by Griffith in NSW. Our analysis shows that most of the abuse occurs in for-profit centres, where cost-cutting, high staff turnover, and routinely breached or gamed child-to-staff ratios leave supervision dangerously thin. Staff burnout, low pay, and fast-tracked training courses are also gutting quality and oversight. It's a trend that worries Michael Bourke, a global authority on child sex offenders. A forensic psychologist who has interviewed more than 1,200 offenders, he founded and led the US Marshal Behavioural Analysis Unit — one of the first teams to use behavioural science to hunt offenders. "Predators are drawn to childcare for the same reason that fishermen are drawn to the place where there's the most fish," Dr Bourke said. "The predators are going to look for any prey-rich environment, any environment in which there's children, and then there's a decreased chance of being detected. So they're going to be looking for places where there's instant trust … and lack of supervision." Warning: This story includes details of sexual abuse The true scale of failures Some of those with cases before the court can be named, others remain hidden behind suppression orders. Joshua Dale Brown is accused of assaulting eight children and producing child abuse material where he worked. Sydney educator David James allegedly filmed 10 children across six of the 60 services he worked at before he was arrested. One of the 13 who cannot be named was arrested in July, accused of taking explicit pictures of ten children over a three-year period. He worked at multiple childcare centres around Sydney for more than a decade, undetected. Police only became aware of him after he uploaded abuse images to a cloud server. Scratch the surface and a sense of the true scale of the failures is revealed. Four Corners has accessed the largest-ever database of childcare regulator files — more than 200,000 pages of documents previously kept from public view — containing alarming findings about the sector in New South Wales, Australia's largest childcare market, and a stark reflection of what is happening nationally. The files reveal widespread gaps in safety, with hundreds of centres breaching child safety laws. There are more than 700 cases involving missing, expired or unverified Working With Children Checks, which is meant to be a fundamental safeguard to keep predators out of childcare. This means children are being cared for by people whose backgrounds were never properly vetted. There are dozens of incidents of alleged inappropriate sexual touching and kissing by educators: biting a child on the back of the neck in a "hidey hole"; filming a child's genitals; showing images of genitals to children; tickling children's inner thighs; a child touching herself and saying "[an educator] told me to do my exercises today". The files, which cover the years 2021 to 2024, include hundreds of cases of poor supervision and breaches of staff ratios — a key line of defence in keeping children safe. There are scores of centres where educators don't understand child protection or mandatory reporting obligations, and centres with chronic deficiencies in record keeping — which makes it hard to track educators as they move from centre to centre. In most cases the regulator responded with a caution or warning letter to the centre to do better, even in repeat cases. NSW Greens MP Abigail Boyd has been working with Four Corners to access these previously hidden files. She is horrified, albeit not surprised, by the extent of sexual abuse and the failure of the regulator. "When you look through the documents and you see the same patterns in all of these places, and it is, it's lack of staffing, it is a lack of regulatory response. It's all these factors coming together that create all these gaps for these paedophiles to wriggle through," Ms Boyd said. "We've had this unregulated sector that has been infiltrated by these profit takers and it's created all these holes for these bad people to worm their way through and do atrocious things. "It's ripe for paedophiles to move in. "They look for scenarios like that. They look for sectors like this. This lack of regulation, this lax approach to allowing these providers to continue at all costs." 'We need to wake up' Four Corners has spent months piecing together court documents and public records to build a nation-wide database of almost 150 childcare workers convicted or accused of child sexual abuse or inappropriate conduct. Some date back decades, but the vast majority offended in the last ten years. Some cases had slipped through barely noticed, like educator Matthew Shane Jones. He was found guilty in 2023 of repeatedly abusing a four-year-old girl at a Hobart childcare centre, including taking photos while she used the toilet and exposing himself to her in the bathroom. The child eventually told her mother: "Matt and I have a secret". He is serving a four-and-a-half-year sentence. Alexander Patrick Wilson is another educator who received scant media attention. After he was discovered forcing a two-year-old boy to give him oral sex at the Brisbane centre where he worked, he pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 12 months behind bars in 2016. The then-20-year-old was also convicted of possessing child exploitation material. Adelaide childcare worker and Families SA foster carer Shannon McCoole secretly ran one of the world's largest online paedophile networks, known as The Love Zone. Arrested in June 2014, he later pleaded guilty to 18 offences, including persistent sexual exploitation of children, and is now serving a 32-year prison sentence. His group required members to upload videos showing children being abused — each child forced to hold a sign with the offender's username, the date, and the words "The Love Zone". Others are charged, convicted and serve their entire prison sentence without ever being publicly named, due to court suppression orders and child protection laws. One Queensland man is serving five years in prison for molesting three boys at his local childcare centre between 2014 and 2018 — crimes that shattered a small country town. University of New South Wales Professor of criminology Michael Salter says childcare centres are not doing enough to detect predators. "My real sense of alarm is that often we are only detecting those men through the online investigations into their images and videos. We are not detecting them on the ground in childcare centres through proactive safeguarding measures," he said. "I don't think that the public has any idea how bad this situation is. I think this information's really been quarantined from the public for a long time and we need to wake up." 'Don't tell anyone' For every case that surfaces, many more never do. Every working day there are more than three reports of sexual or physical abuse of children in child care. But experts say most child abuse in early learning settings is never reported or recorded. Even when cases are reported, few lead to charges or convictions. "Many cases drop out before they reach the stage where you would say it's in the official records. Eighty-four per cent of victims never disclose their sexual abuse in their entire life. So we think we're capturing just a small amount," said Dr Bourke, who has worked with the FBI, CIA and Australian police profiling predators. For a paedophile to be jailed a child must recognise the abuse, be able to disclose it, disclose it, be believed and then have an adult file a report with police. Evidence must be gathered, charges laid, and prosecutors must take the case to trial and win — a chain that rarely holds together. "It's very difficult to make some of these cases and children sometimes don't make the best witnesses … and the perpetrators count on that," Dr Bourke said. Four Corners spoke to dozens of parents across the country who say their children were abused in childcare. Their stories are among the vast number that never make it to court. Two mothers told a Melbourne centre, months apart, that the same educator had sexually abused their children. They separately made reports to the police but both cases went nowhere and the educator kept his job. One of the mothers told Four Corners she is devastated that she put her child into the care of someone who abused her. "We wrote to our local politicians, we wrote to the education department, the centre and pushed to get rid of this guy." She said the centre told her the educator was "quite popular with the parents" and gets "great reviews". The police didn't have enough to build a case. "When my girl is older I want to be able to tell her I did everything I could. I hope that she understands." In Brisbane, another mother said her daughter was sexually abused over a sustained period at a childcare centre. Nothing happened to the abuser. "She went literally overnight from being a happy-go-lucky little kid to being just depressed and miserable," the mother said. "She started to come home with blood in her underpants. She started to say things to me like, 'mummy, would you lick me?' Pointing between her legs. I didn't understand where this was coming from." Her daughter's third birthday was the clarifying moment when she realised she was being sexually abused. "I had bought her Barbie dolls and she ripped off their clothes and she started to lick them between the legs," she said, her voice cracking. "From the age of three, she became malnourished. She couldn't eat. She would replay what happened to her again and again. "And then she thought I was the perpetrator and she would attack me. And this would happen for hours and it would happen every day for years. So I guess one of the messages is that kids are not resilient. People think they are. They become ill from these things and it has long-term repercussions and it steals their childhood." She went to the centre, which was run by women, and was brushed off. She said repeated visits to the police also went nowhere due to lack of evidence. "The system doesn't care about kids," she said. "We need a wakeup call that this is happening in childcare, that you can't just trust that childcare will look after your child. The child is behind a closed door and you have no idea what's going on behind that closed door." Staffing and supervision Drew Viney has seen this broken system at its worst. Running the AFP's elite victim identification team — that works with authorities worldwide to unmask predators, identify child victims used in abuse material, and rescue them from harm — Mr Viney helped catch Ashley Griffith. Griffith was sentenced to life in prison in November 2024 after pleading guilty to raping and assaulting 65 children in Queensland childcare centres. He is set to face a trial for a series of alleged offences against 23 children in NSW. Mr Viney went inside dozens of centres as he worked to track down paedophiles. It opened his eyes to the problems in the sector. He says staff-to-child ratios are not what they should be, "especially given the amount of money that is provided to childcare centres". "The childcare centres would swear black and blue that they would never have the opportunity to do things like that," he said. "But the videos later showed that [Griffith] acted with complete impunity. "He would set up a tripod and would record his ongoing abuse on multiple occasions. There were multiple videos of the kids just playing naked and running around. He had no concern that someone would come in and identify what he was doing." A recent survey of thousands of childcare workers by the United Workers Union revealed staggering levels of understaffing across the sector. Seventy-seven per cent of educators said their centres were understaffed at least weekly. An insider at G8, Australia's second largest childcare chain, leaked a series of WhatsApp messages between staff at centres in Western Australia, laying bare the daily chaos of chronic understaffing: "[Centre name] are six team down tomorrow and need the following shifts for ratio and compliance… any qualification fine…" "Great Beginnings [suburb] is down three team members tomorrow. We need a lunch cover…" "Hey team, I know this is a big ask but we're down four team today… if anyone can come in, please let me know." The insider said this is routine, with ratios often unmet, qualification rules ignored, and "general substandard care not adhered to under ratio requirements across the board". G8 Education said it has policies and procedures to ensure it complies with regulations around appropriate staffing levels. "The safety, well-being, and development of the children in our care is our number one priority," it said. The NSW regulatory files included documents detailing supervision breaches, including hundreds of serious lapses — yet most ended with nothing more than a warning or "caution" letter that "no further action will be taken". We found just one fine: a $200 penalty issued in 2021 after a child scaled a fence and escaped. For the three other breaches that day, the centre received a simple caution. Even repeated failures to meet the legally required staff-to-child ratios took years before any attempt was made to shut a centre down. Many of the staff ratio breaches were severe. In 2023 at a Penrith childcare centre, 25 children, of whom about half were aged under two, were being cared for by only two educators when state regulations required six educators. Another indicator of inattentive or over-stretched educators was how easy it was for children to go missing without centres noticing. In one case, a child escaped a regional centre and was found by a truck driver walking on a nearby national highway. Between January and June this year, 82 centres in Queensland received breaches for children absconding from services. Former childcare centre manager turned childcare consultant Chey Carter blew the whistle on the industry in March, turning down a $1 million contract with childcare giant Affinity Education so she could speak out. Ms Carter said staffing levels were often dangerously low at childcare centres. "Wages are the highest expense when it comes to running a childcare business. So often operators will try to minimise those costs, and the best way to do that is to play with the ratios so that they can reduce the staffing costs. And that can look like leaving one educator alone with children," she said. Industry insider Katrina Broadbent says the childcare sector is in crisis, plagued by staff shortages, declining education standards and widespread confusion about child protection and mandatory reporting. "When you put that financial dollar sign on the care of that child, that's when you're going to start having problems. And I think that's where the for-profit providers are adding to this," she said. "There are for-profit providers that can operate very successful and high-quality services. But I think when you start to acquire too many services, that is when the quality can drop because the organisation just gets far too big to be able to have oversight over all of these services." Ms Broadbent, who spent almost 20 years in the sector auditing big childcare providers at consultancy giant PwC and later led a quality and compliance team at major provider Only About Children (OAC), said the current staff-to-child ratios were challenging. "The bigger providers in particular are operating on very tight budgets and staffing is one way that they can cut costs while still adhering to the basics of regulations," she warned. "As long as they're adhering to the basic staff ratios there's no issue with that. But the issue does lie in that you can't provide quality and safe care of children when you are running at that really base level of one educator to let's say four or five babies. It's just impossible." She said the casualisation of the childcare workforce was another threat to child safety, diluting accountability and creating gaps in supervision. "The casual staff that tend to move between centres is problematic in the bigger companies in that you have these floating staff that aren't necessarily managed by a particular person or manager, and so they have the ability to move between centres and potentially be committing these acts of abuse, but completely going unnoticed," she said. Parents and educators at OAC have told us about a series of incidents of inappropriate touching by educators in centres across the country, including an educator wearing glasses that can discreetly take pictures, another allegedly touching a child's penis, kissing, tickling a child's groin, and a child telling her parent her vagina was sore and saying "I told [educator] to stop, I don't like it". Ms Broadbent left OAC in April but was there when Quoc Phu Tong worked as a casual at four of its centres. Tong was jailed in March after pleading guilty to sexually touching a child. The 36-year-old was sentenced to two years in prison. The childcare files reveal OAC ignored months of complaints from parents and educators about inappropriate kissing and touching by Tong. It took OAC until September last year, after more serious allegations emerged, to act. "In that case, there were fundamental challenges and issues with staff knowledge and education of child protection and what their responsibility is as mandatory reporters, but then also how to respond to concerns from parents and from other educators that something is happening," she said. Only About Children said in a statement it apologises to families impacted by the incidents which were "totally unacceptable" and failed to meet the company's standards. "We continuously learn and improve and have already implemented comprehensive reforms across OAC to minimise the risk of future occurrences," the statement said. "This includes significant investment in additional training and capability of our educators to prevent, identify and respond to child safety risks. "Where our people fall short of our standards and fail to follow established procedures, we hold them to account." The NSW regulator said it imposed a strict set of conditions on the centre and it was closely monitoring its compliance with the law. It said OAC had 320 confirmed breaches across centres in NSW between January 2024 and September 30, 2025. It did not issue any infringement notices during that period. "We see this time and time again, the idea that you could have a service that has identified child sexual abuse, who then doesn't tell the regulator on time, and then the regulator really doesn't respond in any significant way to that. It's pretty telling," Greens MP Abigail Boyd said. 'It's in our backyards' Australia's childcare system is in crisis. There are thousands of passionate educators and there are good centres too but for families, navigating this sector is a minefield. State and federal governments have promised reforms, ranging from CCTV trials, higher penalties and an overhaul of the Working With Children Check system to introduce mutual recognition of bans across states, real-time national monitoring of holders, and a consistent risk-assessment framework to close cross-border loopholes. The federal government has also committed to cutting funding to poor-performing centres, but experts say more needs to be done. In NSW legislation was passed on October 23 including 30 reforms such as compulsory child protection training, a tripling of penalties in line with nationally agreed changes, more transparency including details of current investigations and extending the limitation period for offences to be prosecuted. The NSW government said the reforms were nation-leading. "We are at a historic moment where across all levels of government, there is a real sense of urgency that we have to get early childcare right. And there is a scrutiny on the sector at the moment where the public is just becoming aware that every week we are seeing these egregious child abuse cases," Professor Salter warned. "We have an opportunity now to get this right, but I am worried that the spotlight will move on." He said while children make up 20 per cent of the Australian population, they account for 58 per cent of recorded sexual assault victims. "Half of everyone who's charged with a sexual offence in Australia is charged with a sexual offence against a child. Children are massively over-represented in the sexual violence statistics, but they are not where our sexual violence prevention dollars are going," he said "This is a threat to children that we can mitigate. It's a threat to children that we can tackle if we as adults are willing to step up to the plate. "But too often our discomfort around child sexual abuse means that we look the other way. And that's what offenders rely on." The Minister for Early Childhood Education Jess Walsh said the Albanese government had acted swiftly on child safety in early learning. "We are working shoulder to shoulder with states and territories to increase oversight and hold providers to account through our complementary regulatory enforcement." She did not respond to questions about calls to establish a national childcare commission or review staff ratio levels. The calls are getting louder for a national childcare commission, as recommended by the Productivity Commission, stronger information-sharing between various authorities and police, mandatory reporting with real accountability and urgent action on chronic staffing failures. There are also calls for more scrutiny of the role of the for-profit operators — and to start a discussion on the pervasiveness of child abuse. "People don't like thinking about sex offenders. They don't like thinking about our most vulnerable population being at risk. But in that ignorance and in that silence, in that refusal to step into this world and really see it for what it is, that allows these men to do what they do almost with impunity, it emboldens them. "It's not going to work if we ostrich and put our heads in the sand and just hope it's not in our backyards. It is in our backyards." Watch Four Corners' full investigation, Hunting Ground, tonight from 8:30pm on ABC TV and ABC iview. Story by Adele Ferguson and Chris Gillett Research: Jade Toomey and Dylan Welch Additional research: Madi Chwasta and Lara Sonnenschein Editing and design: Nick Wiggins

India Tops Medals Tally In SAAF Senior Athletics C'ships With 20 Gold Medals
Technology

India Tops Medals Tally In SAAF Senior Athletics C'ships With 20 Gold Medals

India reaffirmed its regional athletic dominance by emerging as the overall champion in the 4th South Asian Senior Athletics Championships 2025, which concluded at the Birsa Munda Stadium in Ranchi on Sunday. The Indian contingent topped the medals tally with 20 gold medals and a total of 58 medals, followed by Sri Lanka, which delivered an impressive performance with 16 gold medals in a total of 40. Nepal secured the third position with two silver and four bronze medals, while Bangladesh (3 bronze) and the Maldives (1 bronze) finished fourth and fifth, respectively. Bhutan concluded the championship without a medal. The final day of the championships witnessed several outstanding performances and new meet records across multiple events. In the Men's 400m Hurdles, India's Ruchit Mori clinched gold with a new meet record time of 50.10 seconds, followed by Kuda Liyanage Ayoma (Sri Lanka) and Karna Bag (India). In the Women's 400m Hurdles, Sri Lanka's K.H. Arachchige Dasun set a new meet record of 58.66 seconds, securing gold, ahead of Aral Loku (Sri Lanka) and Olimba Steffi (India). In the Men's Javelin Throw, Pathirage Rumes (Sri Lanka) took gold with a throw of 84.29m, followed by Ranasinghe Jagat (Sri Lanka) and Uttam Patil (India). In the Men's Long Jump, India's Mohd Sazid claimed gold with a 7.68m jump, followed by Unagolla Yeswesmi (Sri Lanka) and Sarun Payasingh (India). In the Women's High Jump, Reet Rathore (India) secured gold with a jump of 1.76m, followed by Gamage Ranindi (Sri Lanka) and Supriya (India). In the Women's Javelin Throw, Sri Lanka's Hatarabage Leka Nadeeka created a new meet record with a throw of 60.14m, surpassing the previous mark of 51.70m (2008). India's Karishma Sanil and Deepika won silver and bronze, respectively. In the Men's 10,000m, Abhishek (India) won gold with a time of 30:29.46, followed by Rajan Rokaya (Nepal) and Prince Kumar (India). In the Men's Hammer Throw, India's Damneet Singh won gold with a 66.99m throw, followed by Ashish Jakhar (India) and K.K. Damith Mad Dhar (Sri Lanka). In the Women's 800m, Amandeep Kaur (India) took gold in 2:04.66, followed by Kodithuwakku Takshi (Sri Lanka) and Thota Sankeertana (India). In the Men's 800m, D.M. Harsha S. Karuna (Sri Lanka) won gold in 1:51.96, with Som Bahadur Kumal (Nepal) and Mogali Venkatram Reddy (India) following. In the Women's 200m, Sri Lanka's Mohammad Yamick Fatima clocked 23.58s to win gold, while India's Sakshi Chavan and Neeru Pathak secured silver and bronze. In the Men's 4x400m Relay: Sri Lanka took gold with 3:05.12, narrowly ahead of India (3:05.38) and Bangladesh (3:15.00). In the Women's 4x400m Relay: India's women's team won gold with a time of 3:34.70, followed by Sri Lanka (3:35.71) and Bangladesh (3:55.63). The 4th South Asian Senior Athletics Championships 2025 concluded successfully in Ranchi with enthusiastic participation from all South Asian nations. The event, which started on October 24, showcased exceptional athletic talent, new regional records, and strengthened the spirit of sportsmanship and cooperation across the region.(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Capital Agro launches $25m logistics hub to enhance frozen food storage, distribution
Technology

Capital Agro launches $25m logistics hub to enhance frozen food storage, distribution

Capital Agro for Import & Export Group has announced the launch of a new $25m logistics complex dedicated to frozen food storage and distribution, featuring large-scale freezers and integrated sorting and packaging lines. The investment includes $15m allocated for 2025, with an additional $10m planned through 2027. The company has begun developing a fully integrated logistics platform to provide warehousing, trading, and storage services for frozen food products, incorporating advanced smart technologies being introduced for the first time in Egypt’s cold storage and distribution sector. The initiative aims to enhance operational efficiency, expand national storage capacity, and support food security through improved supply chain performance. Strategically located in Belbeis, Sharkia Governorate, the complex lies near key seaports, industrial zones, and agricultural centres, allowing direct access to production sources and consumer markets. The facility will be constructed on land owned by the Sharkia National Food Company, which Capital Agro has secured under a 25-year usufruct agreement. Spanning approximately 30,000 square metres, the new logistics hub will have an operational capacity exceeding 30,000 pallets. It will feature advanced washing, sorting, and packaging lines for fruits and vegetables, positioning it among Egypt’s most significant logistics projects of the year. The facility will operate through a goods bank system, managing the full cycle of storage, withdrawal, and trading while offering real-time inventory tracking and data analysis. Artificial intelligence will be deployed to optimise operations — including storage management, temperature control, and data monitoring — ensuring consistent quality and efficiency. In line with Egypt’s sustainability goals, the project will rely on solar and renewable energy sources to reduce its environmental footprint. With nearly 13 years of experience in the import and export of food products, Capital Agro has built extensive expertise in managing and marketing cold storage facilities and warehouse spaces for third parties. The company also maintains diversified operations in retail trade, including home appliances, electronics, restaurants, and cafés. By combining advanced logistics infrastructure with sustainable technology, Capital Agro’s new complex represents a major step toward strengthening Egypt’s food storage, distribution, and export capabilities.

The call that prompted Greg Chappell to storm out of a selection meeting
Technology

The call that prompted Greg Chappell to storm out of a selection meeting

It was the tightest call of the Laurie Sawle selection panel’s tenure. Coach and selector Bob Simpson, who died aged 89 in August, described it as the only occasion a formal vote was required to split Whitney and Rackemann. Campbell, though by far the junior of the trio, was already in. “Both men deserved the trip,” Simpson recalled in Cricket Then and Now. “I was one of two selectors who went for Whit, in my case because I believed we needed a left-hander. The other pair, however, preferred Carl. “Allan Border was still to come in and give his views on the squad’s makeup, and when he did, he said ‘Rackemann is the right choice. Whit doesn’t swing the ball’. Laurie Sawle, as chairman, promptly announced, ‘OK, that’s the way we’ll go’.” Whitney was unlucky, but the 1989 Ashes touring party would go on to hammer England 4-0. In the early 1990s, Whitney would enjoy a couple of prominent summers in the Test and ODI teams, having gained the ability to swing the ball that Border had required. Dean Jones dropped in 1992 Fifty-two Tests, 3631 runs at 46.55, and two hundreds in his past four games. Yet Deano was sensationally dropped for a young Damien Martyn and the Waugh brothers for the first Test of the 1992-93 home series against the West Indies. “About 10pm Simmo gave me a call and asked me to go to his room,” Jones, who died in 2020, wrote in My Call. “When he offered me a drink at 10pm the night before a Test match I knew the worst. “He told me I wasn’t in form, that I’d had only three hits going into the Test whereas some of the West Australians had as many as nine or 12. So I was left out of the side. I was spewing … because the reasoning behind it was so far out of my control.” Then selector John Benaud committed a whole chapter to his book Matters of Choice to the decision. It highlighted how Jones was not only short of batting at the start of the season, but that his impact on live games early in series had diminished for over two years. Add to that the fact the panel wanted to introduce Martyn, and Mark and Steve Waugh offered bowling skills that helped cover for the injury-prone fast man Bruce Reid. Some years later, Simpson suggested Jones had lost the confidence of the dressing room to build an innings when required. “He was dropped because he had moved away from technical efficiency and consequently was getting out in the most extraordinary ways,” Simpson said. “He was still scoring a few runs, but often streakily, and too often it just didn’t seem as if his brain was in the right gear. The mood in the room when he was batting was ‘which crazy way is Dean going to get out now’.” Made 12th man at the Gabba, Jones was effectively scrubbed from Test cricket when he was left out of the 1993 Ashes touring party. The young players chosen ahead of him – Martyn, Matthew Hayden and Michael Slater – went on to prolific Test careers. Matt Wade’s sledging-based recall in 2016 There were plenty of unsettling pointers to cultural issues in Australian cricket before the ball-tampering scandal in 2018, but few were more blatant than the way Matthew Wade was recalled for Peter Nevill in 2016. Australia had lost five Tests in a row, the last by a huge margin in little more than two days against South Africa in Hobart, forcing the resignation of selection chair Rod Marsh. With Hohns returned to the chair and Greg Chappell the selection panel, the next Test team featured a lot of change. But Wade’s inclusion left Chappell flummoxed, and unafraid to say so. “Suffice to say the team’s leadership felt that a change of wicketkeeper was required and Wade was the preferred candidate,” Chappell told me in 2021. “Not because he was the best wicketkeeper, but because he was the loudest gloveman with the most ‘mongrel’, whatever that means. “I stated, ‘that’s never been a criteria for picking a Test team that I’ve ever heard of, and we shouldn’t be starting that now’. As the idea developed in the meeting I just shook my head, saying ‘no, we can’t go down this path’. “I shook my head again when the decision was made, and it’s the first and only time I’ve walked out of an Australian selection meeting in total disagreement with what we’d just done.” Chappell quickly sought out Pat Howard, Cricket Australia’s then head of team performance, to state his objection. “Mate, I just need to let you know that for the first time in my life as a selector, I’ve been involved in something that I totally disagree with,” Chappell told Howard. “Every other selection meeting I’ve had my say, we’ve had a good discussion, a decision is made and we’ve all been comfortable that we’ve made the right consensus decision. We have just made the wrong decision, and it’s going to end in tears, and I need you to know that from me right now.’” Nathan Lyon out, Ashton Agar in, 2013 As captain of Australia, Michael Clarke was a resolute defender of spin bowlers, and preferred perseverance to experimentation. His loss of official selector status, following a heart-to-heart with Rod Marsh and Allan Border in India during the 2013 “Homework-gate” tour, had one instant outcome. Nathan Lyon, the young spinner about whom other selectors had held reservation for more than a year, was dropped for the start of the 2013 Ashes and replaced by the 19-year-old Ashton Agar. With a thrilling 98, batting 11 on debut at Trent Bridge, Agar made himself an instant pin-up in much the same way as Sam Konstas last summer. But the flow-on effect of his rapid elevation is still being felt. Agar played one more Test in the series at Lord’s before Lyon was recalled to a spot he would not relinquish for well over a decade. Agar never quite developed into the Test cricketer the selectors envisioned, though he became an excellent white ball player. Mike Hussey, a teammate and mentor of Agar, was an outspoken critic of the way he was quickly picked, then swiftly jettisoned. “In my opinion the whole episode was very poorly handled,” Hussey said in 2016. “The duty of care to this young Australian cricketer was pretty much ignored. “If everyone associated with making the decision to pick Ashton had just been patient and let him develop he would have held on to his youthful zeal, grown gradually in confidence, expanded his knowledge and been much better off in the long run.” Usman Khawaja dropped in 2019 Australia’s left-handed batters had huge problems in England in 2019. David Warner endured a nightmare series, Marcus Harris fared little better, and Travis Head was dropped. Usman Khawaja struggled, too, but his exit wasthe start of a three-year exile during which he essentially gave up on returning to the Test team. When Khawaja did return in January 2022, he immediately made twin hundreds at the SCG, and his subsequent run of scoring raised plenty of questions about the wisdom of culling him in 2019. “This is why I’m such a big proponent that your best players are your best players,” Khawaja says. “You go through ups and downs in form, but over time their results will be best. They may get dropped once or twice, but don’t drop them five times. “I remember coming down and JL told me. He sat down and told me face to face. I never vented as much to JL as I might have to [wife] Rach or someone else. But I don’t actually vent a lot. I just get quiet, frustrated and annoyed, sad, whatever it might be. “But in my heart I genuinely thought I’d go back home, score some runs in the Shield and be back in the team. Then when I didn’t get back, I didn’t play well that season. I had some stinking decisions, I thought ‘oh well, that’s it,’ and I came to terms with that.” News, results and expert analysis from the weekend of sport are sent every Monday. Sign up for our Sport newsletter.

Meet the Exciting AI Stock That Has More Than Tripled This Year, and Which Nvidia Is Investing In
Technology

Meet the Exciting AI Stock That Has More Than Tripled This Year, and Which Nvidia Is Investing In

Nvidia (NVDA +2.26%) has been one of the undisputed winners of the artificial intelligence (AI) investing trend. It's a critical supplier of high-powered computing software, and it knows where the money is flowing in the AI race. So, if Nvidia takes a stake in a company, investors should pay attention. According to Nvidia's latest 13-F filing, it only holds shares of six stocks. Its largest investment by far is CoreWeave (CRWV +7.33%). Nvidia's stake in CoreWeave totals over 24 million shares, worth over $3 billion. CoreWeave's stock has more than tripled since going public earlier this year, but is still about 25% off its all-time high set in July. With CoreWeave being backed by one of the most successful companies in the world, is it worth buying right now? CoreWeave is an AI-first cloud computing business Not every company competing in the artificial intelligence race has the capabilities to build a giant data center filled with the most cutting-edge chips from Nvidia. They need to rent compute from another company that does. This isn't a new business model; cloud computing companies have been doing this for years. However, only CoreWeave's platform is specifically marketed and designed to fulfill AI needs. This has caused rapid growth in CoreWeave's business. In Q2, revenue rose 207% year over year to $1.2 billion, with its revenue backlog (deals that it has signed and has yet to realize revenue on) rising 86% year over year to a jaw-dropping $30.1 billion. Few companies have that level of revenue visibility, but CoreWeave has already locked up several years' worth of business. CRWV Revenue (TTM) data by YCharts. After seeing numbers like that, it's no wonder the stock has been popular with investors and that Nvidia is a major investor in this business. At the same time, why is CoreWeave's stock down from its high if it's seeing that kind of success? It all comes down to CoreWeave's profits (or lack thereof). CoreWeave is operating at a loss CoreWeave isn't producing any net income. Most of the time, I'm OK with emerging and growing businesses operating at a loss as they capture market share. However, it doesn't make as much sense for CoreWeave to do so. Graphics processing units (GPUs) from Nvidia have a relatively short lifespan. There are some estimates that GPUs last in Google Cloud's cloud platform for anywhere from one to three years. With that short a lifespan, CoreWeave will need to swap out GPUs quite often. As a result, it's not going to be a business that benefits from scale. A significant portion of its expenses will recur every couple of years when its computing units burn out. The question becomes: If CoreWeave can't become profitable, now during the massive wave of AI spending, when will it ever be profitable? This is investors' primary concern, and it could also explain why CoreWeave has signed massive deals with AI hyperscalers like Meta Platforms. Although Meta is building out a lot of its own AI infrastructure, if CoreWeave is willing to put up a data center, equip it with short-lived GPUs, and run it at a loss, it likely makes financial sense for Meta to rent from it. Given all this, I'm going to steer clear of investing in CoreWeave until it can prove that it's a feasible business model. There are plenty of examples of successful cloud computing businesses, so CoreWeave isn't trying to pioneer a new business model. It just needs to use what has already been proven out, and it could transform into a successful company. But the way it is being run now is concerning. I think investors should buy the GPU supplier, Nvidia, instead, as it's slated to continue selling a massive number of GPUs for years to come.

NZ’s first marine reserve is turning 50 – the lessons from its recovery are invaluable
Technology

NZ’s first marine reserve is turning 50 – the lessons from its recovery are invaluable

New Zealand’s first legislated marine reserve, established 50 years ago around Te Hāwere-a-Maki/Goat Island north of Auckland, was also among the very first in the world. During the decades since then, marine scientists have been monitoring changes and tracking significant transformations in the ecosystem – from bare rocky reefs to thriving kelp forests. Officially known as the Cape Rodney-Okakari Point Marine Reserve, the 556 hectares of protected waters and seabed became New Zealand’s first no-take zone in 1975. Back then, very little grew on the shallow rocky reefs. It took almost three decades for kelp forests to reestablish following the slow recovery of crayfish and snapper stocks. These predators play an essential role in keeping marine reef ecosystems healthy because they eat kina (sea urchins) which otherwise increase in numbers and mow down kelp forests. Once crayfish and snapper were able to mature and grow, the kelp forests returned. Their recovery in turn provided a nursery for juvenile fish and many species came back. We now see parrotfish, black angelfish, blue maomao, red moki, silver drummers, leatherjackets, octopus and several species of stingrays. Bottlenose dolphins and orca pass through occasionally. The reserve features a far higher density of fish and other marine life than outside its boundaries. But despite the protection, fish are not as plentiful within the reserve now as they were in the late 1970s. The ongoing changes within the protected area are helping us to understand the impact of commercial and recreational fishing. Pressures from fisheries In 1964, a decade before the marine reserve was established, the Leigh marine laboratory opened on the cliffs above it. Its first director, Bill Ballantine, was concerned that fish stocks were dwindling and marine ecosystems declining in the Hauraki Gulf and became a key force in pushing for the marine reserve to be set up. But since 1975, Auckland’s population has exploded and recreational and commercial fishing pressures outside the marine reserve have increased markedly. While crayfish numbers and sizes began to recover when the marine reserve was established, they have dropped again over the past ten years. And fish stocks in the reserve remain far below the levels that would have been present before commercial fishing began to intensify rapidly in the area during the 1950s. We think this is because the reserve is too small and continues to be affected by the rise in commercial and recreational fishing in the Hauraki Gulf. Large snapper and crayfish sometimes move out of the reserve and are caught. The outside areas aren’t replenishing the reserve because they are heavily fished. Recent research shows people can speed up kelp restoration in some places by removing kina, but large snapper and crayfish are still needed to maintain the balance long-term. Another key discovery has been that the reserve’s many mature snapper produce about ten times more juvenile snapper than in unprotected areas of the same size. About 11% of young snapper found up to 40 kilometres away from the reserve are offspring of snapper that live in the reserve. This “spillover effect” means the reserve is actually enhancing fisheries in the Hauraki Gulf. Safeguarding the ocean The Hauraki Gulf Tīkapa Moana Marine Protection Act, which comes into force this month, makes the Goat Island marine reserve about four times larger, extending the offshore boundary from 800 metres to three kilometres and significantly increasing the diversity of habitats protected. The marine reserve has demonstrated the value of safeguarding patches of sea, but it has also shown that reserves need to be larger to better protect key species such as crayfish and snapper from fishing pressures. It is also important to protect different types of habitat, in particular the soft-sediment seafloor ecosystems that comprise the bulk of the Hauraki Gulf. These ecosystems are high in biodiversity, support important fisheries, sequester carbon and process nutrients that maintain productivity. But they are vulnerable to seafloor disturbance. As the impacts of climate change worsen, the historical records and understanding we have drawn from this marine reserve now act as an important baseline. We know that restoring kelp forests in the reserve and elsewhere has made the area more resilient to climate change, while also contributing to carbon sequestration. If kelp forests were restored in the Hauraki Gulf Marine Park, the plants would be worth about NZ$7.9 million in carbon credits, if they were valued in the same way as land-based forests. About 350,000 people visit the reserve annually, mostly to snorkel, dive or take a glass-bottom boat trip to explore the abundance of life beneath the waves. A lot more places could look like this marine reserve if we managed our oceans better.

‘Wait with me until it’s over’: what teens want you to know about dissociation
Technology

‘Wait with me until it’s over’: what teens want you to know about dissociation

You call your teen’s name, but they don’t respond. They’re staring past you. You call again, louder this time. Nothing – how rude. But what if they’re zoning out? For some teens, this can be a sign of dissociation, a temporary disconnection from thoughts, feelings, body or surroundings. It’s the brain’s way of protecting itself from overwhelming stress or emotion. Dissociation is often linked to trauma – experiences that feel deeply distressing or life-threatening. But because dissociation is quiet and invisible, it often goes unnoticed. A withdrawn or “spacey” teen draws less attention than one who’s anxious or acting out. Misunderstanding this response can lead to frustration and strained relationships. In two recent studies, we interviewed teens who dissociate, as well as their parents and clinicians. We wanted to understand better what it feels like when it happens – and what would help. What is dissociation? Dissociation is the brain’s safety switch. When emotions or memories feel too intense, the brain creates distance, like mentally stepping out of the room. It’s common to experience mild forms of dissociation, such as zoning out during a boring meeting. But for teens who’ve experienced trauma, it can feel more intense and be more disruptive. Many people underestimate how common trauma is for young people. Worldwide, almost three in four teens have experienced at least one traumatic event, such as violence, serious accidents, or the death of a loved one. In Western countries, this may be closer to one in two. Read more: Major study reveals two-thirds of people who suffer childhood maltreatment suffer more than one kind Distressing content is also streamed directly to teens’ devices. Violent videos, cyberbullying or hate-based online abuse can all trigger overwhelmed feelings. When feelings become too much to handle, dissociation offers immediate relief. But over-use of dissociation to cope can disrupt learning, relationships and daily life. Surveys suggest this clinical form of dissociation affects 7–11% of high school students, making it as common as anxiety disorders. Yet dissociation in young people is still not well understood, even by professionals. What we wanted to find out To better understand dissociation, our research team spoke with dissociating teens about what the experience feels like, what triggers it and what helps. Seven teenagers who had experienced significant trauma and were receiving care at a Western Australian mental health service shared their experiences. Given dissociation can affect memory and awareness, we also interviewed each teen’s parent and primary clinician. While our study involved a small number of teens, their reflections gave us powerful insight into the lived experience of dissociation in adolescence. What teens told us Teens described dissociation as feeling disconnected from their body or as though reality had gone blurry. Lisa* (age 17) said: I could look in the mirror and not feel like it was me […] I knew it was me, but I didn’t feel like it was me. Verity* (age 14) explained: I’m zoned out and don’t notice what’s going on around me. […] People could be calling my name or waving in my face, and like, I don’t notice. Parents told us their teens could sometimes become completely unresponsive – unable to move or talk – or have emotional outbursts they later couldn’t remember. Dissociation was most likely when teens felt strong emotions triggered by reminders of trauma, conflict or peer rejection. Many teens said the most helpful thing was knowing a trusted person was nearby. They often didn’t want advice or questions – just reassurance someone would stay close. I like having company because I don’t cope on my own […] it’s helpful to have someone just wait with me until it’s over. Sometimes, they wanted more active help with strategies. Amy* (age 16) said calming techniques can help: if someone else is there and they’re telling me what to do […] I can’t really do it on my own when I’m like that [dissociating]. Others said retreating to quiet spaces helped them come back to the present. But when they didn’t feel able to reach out for support, some teens turned to less helpful strategies, like disappearing into fantasy worlds for hours. Our research suggests that to reduce the chances of this, it’s important for teens to know you’re there. What parents can do Bullying, rejection or failure can all feel catastrophic to a developing mind. Teens may also experience traumas adults don’t know about. If a teen seems distant or unresponsive, stay curious rather than frustrated. Ask yourself what might be happening beneath the surface. When dissociation happens, stay physically present and calm. Offer to help them with activities like going for a walk, breathing slowly, or doing something sensory, such as holding a warm drink. If dissociation happens frequently or severely, consider reaching out to a mental health professional or GP for support. Why it matters Dissociation isn’t bad behaviour – it’s a coping response to trauma and stress, and can be a sign a teen is overwhelmed. When adults recognise this, they can respond with empathy instead of frustration. We’d like to see trauma-informed approaches in homes and schools. This means building safety and trust with young people and supporting collaboration. Offering choice (for example, taking a short break or choosing where they sit in the classroom) can empower them to have some control over their environment. Calm, sensory-friendly spaces can also help kids feel safe and ready to learn. Recognising dissociation and responding with patience and compassion can help your teen and strengthen your relationship in the process. *Names have been changed to protect privacy. If this article has raised issues for you, or if you’re concerned about someone you know, call Lifeline on 13 11 14 or Kids Helpline (ages 5–25 and parents) on 1800 55 1800.

Most Australian government agencies aren’t transparent about how they use AI
Technology

Most Australian government agencies aren’t transparent about how they use AI

A year ago, the Commonwealth government established a policy requiring most federal agencies to publish “AI transparency statements” on their websites by February 2025. These statements were meant to explain how agencies use artificial intelligence (AI), in what domains and with what safeguards. The stated goal was to build public trust in government use of AI – without resorting to legislation. Six months after the deadline, early results from our research (to be published in full later this year) suggest this policy is not working. We looked at 224 agencies and found only 29 had easily identifiable AI transparency statements. A deeper search found 101 links to statements. That adds up to a compliance rate of around 45%, although for some agencies (such as defence, intelligence and corporate agencies) publishing a statement is recommended rather than required, and it is possible some agencies could share the same statement. Still, these tentative early findings raise serious questions about the effectiveness of Australia’s “soft-touch” approach to AI governance in the public sector. Why AI transparency matters Public trust in AI in Australia is already low. The Commonwealth’s reluctance to legislate rules and safeguards for the use of automated decision making in the public sector – identified as a shortcoming by the Robodebt royal commission – makes transparency all the more critical. The public expects government to be an exemplar of responsible AI use. Yet the very policy designed to ensure transparency seems to be ignored by many agencies. With the government also signalling a reluctance to pass economy-wide AI rules, good practice in government could also encourage action from a disoriented private sector. A recent study found 78% of corporations are “aware” of responsible AI practices, but only 29% have actually “implemented” them. Transparency statements The transparency statement requirement is the key binding obligation under the Digital Transformation Agency’s policy for the responsible use of AI in government. Agencies must also appoint an “accountable [AI] official” who is meant to be responsible for AI use. The transparency statements are supposed to be clear, consistent, and easy to find – ideally linked from the agency’s homepage. In our research, conducted in collaboration with the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, we sought to identify these statements, using a combination of automated combing through websites, targeted Google searches, and manual inspection of the list of federal entities facilitated by the information commissioner. This included both agencies and departments strictly bound by the policy and those invited to comply voluntarily. But we found only a few statements were accessible from the agency’s landing page. Many were buried deep in subdomains or required complex manual searching. Among agencies for which publishing a statement was recommended, rather than required, we struggled to find any. More concerningly, there were many for which we could not find the statement even where it was required. This may just be a technical failure, but given the effort we put in, it suggests a policy failure. A toothless requirement The transparency statement requirement is binding in theory but toothless in practice. There are no penalties for agencies that fail to comply. There is also no open central register to track who has or has not published a statement. The result is a fragmented, inconsistent landscape that undermines the very trust the policy was meant to build. And the public has no way to understand – or challenge – how AI is being used in decisions that affect their lives. How other countries do it In the United Kingdom, the government established a mandatory AI register. But as the Guardian reported in late 2024, many departments failed to list their AI use, despite the legal requirement to do so. The situation seems to have slightly improved this year, but still many high-risk AI systems identified by UK civil society groups are still not published on the UK government’s own register. The United States has taken a firmer stance. Despite anti-regulation rhetoric from the White House, the government has so far maintained its binding commitments to AI transparency and mitigation of risk. Federal agencies are required to assess and publicly register their AI systems. If they fail to do so, the rules say they must stop using them. Towards responsible use of AI In the next phase of our research, we will analyse the content of the transparency statements we did find. Are they meaningful? Do they disclose risks, safeguards and governance structures? Or are they vague and perfunctory? Early indications suggest wide variation in quality. If governments are serious about responsible AI, they must enforce their own policies. If determined university researchers cannot easily find the statements – even assuming they are somewhere deep on the website – that cannot be called transparency. The authors wish to thank Shuxuan (Annie) Luo for her contribution to this research.

The Art Gallery of NSW has transformed into a space to cook, play, do laundry and linger
Technology

The Art Gallery of NSW has transformed into a space to cook, play, do laundry and linger

Children’s screams echo off concrete walls as they navigate bright-painted monkey bars. Families huddle around a sausage sizzle. Teenagers lounge on borrowed towels near a palm grove. Washing machines hum quietly in the corner. But we are inside the Art Gallery of New South Wales. Mike Hewson’s The Key’s Under the Mat is one of the most ambitious and intelligent works of public art created in Australia in recent years. What makes this work so remarkable is how completely it succeeds on multiple registers simultaneously. It’s a functioning neighbourhood park, a sculptural tour de force, and a sophisticated meditation on what we mean by “public space”. Hewson has thought through every detail with extraordinary care. Inside the gallery’s cavernous underground tank gallery, brass spoons are hammered into custom concrete pavers. Steel rails are hand-painted rather than powder-coated, giving them a casual, approachable quality. Trinkets and tiles are embedded throughout like hidden treasures. Look down at the ground and the pavers read like abstract paintings. The craft is exquisite – but it doesn’t announce itself. Instead, it creates an environment where people feel genuinely welcome to cook, play, do laundry and linger. And they do. Watching families engage with this space – not in hushed gallery tones but with the comfortable ease of a neighbourhood park – reveals the work’s most radical achievement: most people using it (primarily children under 12, on the day I visit) have no idea they’re in an artwork. ‘Hopeful embellishment’ The work emerged from the artist’s experience of the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Witnessing the collapse of structures that had seemed permanent, Hewson became fascinated by provisional repair, improvised solutions, and the community-building gestures that emerge from disaster. Hewson’s subsequent projects have celebrated what curator Justin Paton calls “defiant repair and hopeful embellishment”: the beauty of making-do with care and resourcefulness. The Key’s Under the Mat brings this ethos into dialogue with institutional space in ways that are both generous and thought-provoking. The vast tank at the Art Gallery of NSW was built urgently in 1942 to hold fuel for the war effort, then abandoned for decades before being drained, cleaned and opened to the public in 2022. Here, it becomes the perfect container for Hewson’s vision of repurposed, reimagined public infrastructure. The work’s intelligence lies not just in what it provides, but in what it reveals about the nature of “public” space itself. The gallery is a public institution, and entry is free. Yet accessing the tank still requires certain conditions: geographic proximity, availability during gallery hours, cultural confidence to enter a major art institution, and the knowledge that this remarkable space exists at all. By creating functioning public amenities – laundromat, barbecue, playground – Hewson makes visible something we often overlook: “public” always comes with conditions. Laundromats require proximity, mobility and often money. Park barbecues require time, transport and sometimes booking systems. No public space is universally accessible, even when it’s genuinely free and open. The project illuminates this with remarkable clarity. In trying to create the most welcoming, functional and generous public space possible within a gallery, Hewson reveals both what institutions can achieve and where their reach inevitably stops. It’s a paradox the work holds lightly but meaningfully. Institutional critique; joyful amenity There’s something profound about how the work operates for different audiences. Children climb and play without needing to understand they’re experiencing art. Art-literate visitors notice the handmade pavers, the embedded spoons, the deliberate aesthetic choices. Both experiences are valid; both are intended. The work makes room for multiple ways of engaging – from pure use to deep analysis. This multiplicity extends to a question Hewson leaves deliberately open: should there be more interpretive signage explaining the work’s intentions and extraordinary craft? The current approach lets the art disappear into life, functioning without demanding recognition. But it also means the labour and thought remain visible primarily to those already versed in contemporary art’s vocabularies. There’s no single right answer – and the work’s refusal to choose feels intentional. Hewson has described children as his “first ambassadors and interpreters” for this work. Watching kids genuinely inhabit the space confirms his instinct. They don’t need permission or explanation – they simply use what’s there. The Key’s Under the Mat achieves something rare: it is simultaneously a sophisticated institutional critique and a genuinely joyful public amenity. The work’s title captures its spirit perfectly. It is an invitation, a gesture of trust and openness. That the mat sits within an institution with its own forms of access doesn’t negate the generosity of the gesture – it contextualises it. Hewson has created the most open, welcoming, thoughtfully crafted public space he can within the given parameters, and in doing so, has made us think more carefully about what “public” means in all contexts. The Key’s Under the Mat doesn’t solve the contradictions inherent in institutional public space. It doesn’t need to. Its achievement is making those contradictions visible, tangible and surprisingly joyful to experience. In a cultural landscape often divided between art that’s critically sophisticated and art that’s genuinely popular, Hewson has created something that brilliantly refuses to choose. The Key’s Under the Mat is now open at the Art Gallery of New South Wales.

Foreign spies are trying to steal Australian research. We should be doing more to stop them
Technology

Foreign spies are trying to steal Australian research. We should be doing more to stop them

When we think of spies, we may go to images of people in trench coats and dark glasses, trying to steal government papers. Or someone trying to tap the phone of a senior official. The reality of course can be much more sophisticated. One emerging area of concern is how countries protect their university research from foreign interference. And how we safely do research with other countries – a vital way to ensure Australia’s work is cutting edge. This week, research security experts including myself will meet in Brussels to talk about how to conduct free and open research in the face of growing security risks around the world. What does Australia need to do to better protect its university research? What is research security? Research security means protecting research and development (R&D) from foreign government interference or unauthorised access. It is especially important in our universities, where the freedom to publish, collaborate, and work together is seen as a virtue. Australia’s universities face escalating, deliberate efforts to steal commercially or militarily valuable research, repress views critical of foreign regimes, and database hacking. As my July 2025 report found, adversaries are no longer just stealing data or cultivating informal relationships. We’re seeing deliberate efforts to insert malicious insiders, target researchers and exploit data and cyber vulnerabilities. ASIO head Mike Burgess has stressed there is an incredible danger facing our academic community from spies and secret agents. In 2024, Burgess warned of an “A-team” of spies targeting academia: leading Australian academics and political figures were invited to a conference in an overseas country, with the organisers covering all expenses […]. A few weeks after the conference wrapped up, one of the academics started giving the A-team information about Australia’s national security and defence priorities. But Australia can’t just stop collaborating with foreign nations. Some are far more scientifically advanced than we are, and we risk cutting ourselves off from developments in the latest technology. In other cases, we might be unfairly discriminating against researchers from other countries. The international research landscape is changing Since January, US President Donald Trump has slashed university funding, banned foreign students and orchestrated a campaign of lawsuits and investigations into campus activities. This has a huge flow-on effect to Australia, as we have tied ourselves strongly to the US for science and technology funding. So Australia is looking to the EU as a more reliable and sustainable funding partner. It has reactivated talks to join the €100 billion (A$179 billion) Horizon Europe fund. Australia abandoned its original attempt in 2023 citing “potential cost of contributions to projects”. Horizon Europe isn’t just a massive pot of money for Australian researchers. It’s also a way to bring Australia closer to the EU on other initiatives, like the EU Science Diplomacy Alliance, which ensures scientific developments are pursued for the safety, security and benefits for all people. Yet if Australia wants to join Horizon Europe, it will need to prove it takes research security as seriously as other EU nations. In April 2024, Australia and the EU agreed to strengthen research security and measures to protect critical technology and to counter foreign interference in research and innovation. Australia does not have an adequate policy But Australia does not have a proper national policy on research security. It also does not have a proper guide for our 43 universities in how they should approach it or what the minimum standards are. The guidelines we have for “countering foreign interference” are entirely voluntary, and not centrally monitored for compliance in any way. A 2022 federal parliamentary report detailed a litany of attempts by foreign agents to get access to our universities. It made 27 recommendations about improving that situation. To date, the federal government has not yet acted on about three quarters of these. These included a recommendation to ban involvement in “talent recruitment programs”, where academics are offered vast sums of money or other benefits to duplicate their research in countries like China. The EU approach Australia’s approach is in stark contrast to the EU, which has made research security a priority. In May 2024, the European Commission directed all 27 member states to adopt laws and policies to “work together to safeguard sensitive knowledge from being misused”. Germany has since adopted “security ethics committees” – modelled on human and animal ethics committees – to scrutinise potential projects for dangerous or high-risk research. The Netherlands, Denmark and United Kingdom all set up government contact points to help academics answer questions about research security practices. It will take more than just policies Australia needs clearer, stronger national policies for research security. But if we are going to take this seriously, we need more than just policy guidance. To properly scrutinise and set up research, universities need time, support and information. This also means they need more funding. In some universities there might be one person responsible for research security, and this may not be their sole job. So we also need funding to give academics a way to identify and manage risks in research and support information sharing across institutions. Through these measures we will be able to demonstrate to the world we are doing research securely – and it is safe to fund and work with Australia.

Were you on Facebook 10 years ago? You may be able to claim part of this $50 million payout
Technology

Were you on Facebook 10 years ago? You may be able to claim part of this $50 million payout

Right now, more than 311,000 Australian Facebook users can apply for a slice of a A$50 million compensation fund from tech giant Meta – the largest ever payment for a breach of Australians’ privacy. But the clock is ticking. Even if you’re eligible, you only have until December 31 2025 to make your claim. Similar payouts have already begun in the United States. From who’s eligible, to how to make a claim, to how much the eventual payout might be: here’s what you need to know. Why so many Australians can apply The landmark settlement arose from Meta’s involvement in the Cambridge Analytica scandal: a massive data breach in the 2010s, when a British data firm harvested private information from 87 million Facebook profiles worldwide. It led to a record-breaking US$5 billion penalty (about $A7.7 billion today) in the US against Meta as Facebook’s parent company, and the creation of a US$725 million (A$1.1 billion) compensation scheme for affected Americans. Here in Australia, an investigation by the national privacy regulator – the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner – found Cambridge Analytica used the This Is Your Digital Life personality quiz app to extract personal information. That investigation found just 53 Australian Facebook users installed the app. But another 311,074 Australian Facebook users were friends of those 53 people, meaning the app could have requested their information too. In December 2024, the Information Commissioner announced she had settled a court case with Meta in return for an “enforceable undertaking”, including a record A$50 million payment program. Claims opened on June 30 this year and close on December 31. Who can apply? You can apply if you: held a Facebook account between 2 November 2013 and 17 December 2015 (the eligibility period) were in Australia for more than 30 days during that period, and either installed the Life app or were Facebook friends with someone who did. How to apply – but watch for scams The Facebook Payment Program is being administered by consultants KPMG. (Meta has to pay KPMG to run it; that doesn’t come out of the $50 million fund.) That website is where to go with questions or to lodge a claim. Meta has sent all Australians it knows may be eligible this “token” notification within Facebook: You may be entitled to receive payment from litigation recently settled in Australia. Learn more. Try this link to see if the company has records of you or your friends logging into the Digital Life app. If there are, you should be able to use the “fast track” application. If you didn’t get that notification but you think you were affected, you can make a claim using the standard process by proving: your identity, such as with a passport or driver’s licence you held a Facebook account and were located in Australia during the eligibility period. But watch out for scammers pretending to be from Facebook or to be helping with claims. Which payout could you be eligible for? You need to choose to apply for compensation under one of two “classes”, requiring different types of proof. Class 1: the harder option, expected to get higher payouts To claim for “specific loss or damage”, you’ll need to provide documented evidence of economic and/or non-economic loss or damages. For example, this could include out-of-pocket medical or counselling costs, or having to move if your personal details were made public. You’ll also need to show that damage was caused by the Cambridge Analytica data breach. For many people, proving extensive loss or damage may be difficult. Class 1 claims will be decided first. There are no predetermined payout amounts; each will be decided individually. If your class 1 claim is unsuccessful, but you’re otherwise eligible for a payout, you will be able to get a class 2 payout instead. Class 2: the easier option, likely to get smaller payouts Alternatively, you can choose to claim only for loss or damage based on “a generalised concern or embarrassment” caused by the data breach. It’s a much easier process – but also likely to be a much smaller payment. All class 2 claimants will receive the same amount, after the class 1 payouts. These claimants only need to provide a statutory declaration that they have a genuine belief the breach caused them concern or embarrassment. In Meta’s enforceable undertaking with the Information Commissioner, it states KPMG is able to apply a cap on payments to claimants. It also says if there is money left after all the payouts, KPMG will pay that amount to the Australian government’s Consolidated Revenue Fund. Meta told The Conversation: There is not a pre-determined cap on payments. The appropriate time to determine whether any cap should apply to payments made to claimants is following the end of the registration period [December 31]. So it’s not yet clear how much of the $50 million fund will go to Australian claimants versus how much could end up going to the federal government. Payments are expected to be made from around August 2026. How much are payouts likely to be? Payouts from similar settlements by Meta elsewhere have been very small. For example, US Facebook users eligible for their US$725 million compensation scheme have expressed surprise at the size of their payouts. One report suggests the average US payment is around US$30 (A$45) each. Here in Australia, a lot will depend on how many people bother to register between now and December 31.

Car plunges off Santa Cruz Wharf; divers pull person, dog from wreck